Too easy to pretend after having been exposed as a peddler of gutter level fake news. If the goal is to trap one's opponents by deliberately feigning to endorse a report one knows is fake, then what one will tend to do is to choose or even write up a story in line with opposite narratives, not with one's own. This way, after adversaries repeat the claims they'll lose credibility once the bogus nature of said claims is revealed. But if the story is actually in line with one's personal views the effect is largely neutralized. So the above video reeks of shaky damage control.
Interestingly, this person is sporting what may be zionist and masonic symbols in their program. When there's only one, we usually dismiss it as a coincidence but when there are two or more it warrants caution. Namely, the hexagon in the background (look at the inner shape of a so-called star of David, it's a hexagon) coupled with the pyramid icon at the bottom left of the screen which appears or used to appear before (the pyramid being an obvious freemason symbol).
What's more, this subject themself proclaimed a few months ago that two out of about twelve founding members of their group are Jewish, including the group's current main thinker, a person who chooses to illustrate his Twitter page with a representation of Niccolò Machiavelli, emblematic figure of western political thought known for his rejection of any notion of ethics in governance, a concept largely alien to Iranian political culture including in pre-Islamic times. Machiavelli happens to be a favorite of American zionist neoconservatives too, as exemplified by the book on Machiavelli authored by prominent anti-Iranian neocon Michael Ledeen.
After Dana stated that his foremost associate is Jewish, viewers of his program started discussing the information. As a result of which Dana reversed his statement and invited the person in question to a follow up show, where the latter then claimed he is born to Moslem parents. Now here's the question: what are the odds that you'd be mistaken about the religious background of one of your closest collaborators you've been working with for more than fifteen years, on topics that involve religion among others?
Dana claimed to have been in contact with and publicly praises Parviz Sabeti, the former leading SAVAK official who apart from presumably hailing from a family of Haifan Baha'is and possible crypto-Jews, is reported to have been in charge of SAVAK / Mossad's stay-behind network in Iran. That network in turn has been handling major
nofuzis, infiltrated agents of influence and sabotage working against the Islamic Republic from within the system.
Not to mention how Dana is whitewashing murderers of police and security forces as "heroes", encouraging instability and organized armed attacks against the Islamic Republic, and regularly calling on people to physically assault and murder any person who will non-violently and peacefully remind the dress code rules to those who violate it. This is in fact perfectly illicit including in western countries but YouTube tolerates it because this sort of incitement directly plays into the hands of the USA, zionist and EU regimes and their plots against the Iranian nation.
Dana is also on the record for stating that a balkanized, dismantled Iran is preferable to one enacting sharia law, and also that he prefers westernization and liberalism over Islam (a tendency historically shared with lots of so-called "nationalists" all the way back to Taqizade, who in fact are westernized liberals, islamophobic secularists and zionists dissimulated under a garb of pseudo-nationalism).
He participated in the attempt to trivialize "I'SIS terror attacks after the Shah Cheraq incident, pretending it had been facilitated by government authorities. The enemy needed its stooges to proceed in such a way, so that if the government were to face large scale armed insurgency, which would automatically lead to groups such as "I"SIS making their appearance much like in Syria, people would keep blaming the government and not the opposition and their zio-American backers who would've instigated the chaos in the first place. In short, this is a tactic to ensure that even "I"SIS or MKO attacks wouldn't deter rioters from pressing on with their attempts to destabilize the Islamic Republic, even though it's precisely actions like these which would tend to busy security forces and thus make it easier for the likes of "I"SIS, MKO and separatist terrorists to enter the fray.
To top it off, Dana explicitly advocated turning Iran into a hub for prostitution catering to international tourists. This is not the discourse of a nationalis but sophistry serving the agenda of Iran's existential enemies. Hence why he's authorized by EU regimes to post his show on western-controlled "social media". Had western regimes deemed it to be contrary to their anti-Iranian interests, they'd have arranged for it to be censored.
www.fardanews.com
