On twitter the information you receive depends on who you choose to follow. I get tweets from Marandi and Khamenei as well. If I want to I can exclusively get tweets from them and pro Islamic Republic sources. Also if you have critical thinking skills then you can sift through all the info regardless.
Most readers are deprived of such skills. Also a large segment of public opinion does not have strongly marked party-political allegiances. They will follow accounts they stumble upon. And when anti-Iranian accounts outnumber pro-Iranian ones by a factor of about a hundred thousand to a million, then chances are that those ordinary users with no prior convictions will follow an anti-IR source.
YES Assad is party to blame for the war in Syria. Because he is a dictator and he could have prevented the entire war by holding a UN supervised election. But he wouldn't even consider it, he wanted and still wants to cling onto power at any cost. Same thing with any dictatorship.
The Syrian government did acquiesce to a UN supervised election. The opposition rejected it. So no, you're wrong here.
In Iran also, the government could have put an end to this mess a long time ago. First of all, they could have conducted a proper investigation into Mahsa Amini's death,
How many times must one tell you that the evidence put forth is enough to determined that Mahsa Amini was not killed by law enforcement?
CCTV footage, CT scans published by Saudi media which can't be suspected of sympathy for the IR, recorded statement of her father about her health condition, are amply sufficient to drive home the point.
You're grasping at straws with this "proper investigation" demand. The above does not call for additional "investigation", which would not yield anything else anyway, considering what's known already.
they could have gotten rid of the morality police or lessened their powers.
There's no morality police in Iran. Infringements to the dress code are dealt with by Law Enforcement.
Moreover, the counter-revolutionary lot brainwashed by decades of enemy propaganda won't be content with a liberalization of the dress code.
Also, many are supportive of the current dress code and most importantly, a government should not yield to mob violence as it would set a dangerous precedent.
They could hold UN supervised elections and put the entire matter to rest. Will they even consider any of these measures ?
What "UN supervised elections"? Elections in Iran are fair and square, your suggestion is an affront to Iranian sovereignty.
If a girls hejab slips off a bit, let's say by accident, do they then really need to force her to go to a building so the government can teach her about Islam ? Can they not they give them a fine with a brochure ?
Not teach her about Islam, remind her of the law and its technicalities.
There'll always be agents who'll implement the law in a less than perfect manner. Be it in Iran or elsewhere. Normal people do not start violent riots because of something like this.
Especially that night Mahsa Amini died, when the morality HQ was already packed with a massive crowd. then why did they find the need to pack more people there ?
So laws should stop being enforced on grounds that this or that HQ is packed with people? Also the density in that building was nothing out of the ordinary for a public administration in Iran. Go to any public office and see.
Even in Saudi Arabia they got rid of the morality police. The Saudis are much more intelligent than the government of the Islamic Republic. Their people are generally content and more prosperous than average Iranians. They trade with the US and every other country instead of making enemies with the country with the largest economy on the planet.
And their regime is, in the words of a USA president, a "milking cow" to imperialist powers. It has no real sovereignty, no full fledged independence, no ability to determine policy autonomously.
No different from Iran under the Pahlavi regime. Iranians revolted against the latter in order to see their country's independence restored, and are not going to allow a bunch of elements brainwashed by the enemy to reverse it.
As for people being content, subject the Saudi population to 1% of the propaganda, psy-ops, social engineering Iranians have been suffering, and see what happens.
China is the US's number one rival and the biggest single threat to western hegemony. Yet they trade with the US.
China and the USA weren't rivals when they started to trade on a larger scale. They were geostrategic partners since the Sino-Soviet shift and cooperated closely in southeast Asia, Vietnam and Cambodia specifically.
Also and as said, the USA regime does not view Iran from the same lens. When it comes to Iran, they are not interested at all in replicating the relationship they have with China.
The objective of the zio-American empire vis à vis Iran is this:
Any and all type of rapprochement Washington would be willing to operate with Iran, would be entirely designed to serve the above agenda.
You're repeating certain talking points without taking into account responses you were given. Which tends to make it unnecessarily redundant.
Why do the majority of Iranians have to live below the poverty line because of the Iranian governments unpragmatic, unfeasible and unsustainable economic policies ?
You're repeating a piece of disinformation, why? Once again, the poverty rate in Iran stands at around 18%. Majority of Iranians aren't poor. Please refrain from rehashing inaccurate data.
No but if security forces open fire on people or use excessive brutality towards people, then people eventually get fed up and might respond right ?
Except that it has been the other way around: law enforcement were attacked with mind-boggling brutality from the very onset of these riots, and no, they had not opened fire on anyone before.
If its a non-issue then why don't they get rid of mandatory hejab or get rid of morality police or at the very least lessen their powers rather than allowing them to abduct peoples wives/daughters and beat men who are sitting in a women's only subway or drag away girls if they don't abide by the hejab ?
Arresting an offender is not "abducting". Kindly use the appropriate term.
Why get rid of something which has benefits of its own, seeing how it contributes to upholding decency in public? However, you will have hard a time convincing rationally thinking people that a side aspect such as the duty for women to don a headscarf is public is reason enough to destabilize your country.
I mean almost anywhere in the world if a man goes into a woman's bathroom, the police will eventually use force but option A isn't going to be to approach the suspect and start clubbing him without any warning. Are Iranians not human ? Are they animals ? They don't deserve basic dignity or human rights ?
No clue what you're referring to here.
If you want examples of police violence in the west, be my guest. They are so numerous they could keep you busy for some time.
The west doesn't necessarily want Iran "destroyed" They just want to get rid of the Islamic Republic and many Iranians seem to agree.
No, the zio-American empire wants Iran destroyed. Much more so than they wanted Iraq, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Yugoslavia destroyed. Iran's a much greater adversary to them than the latter have ever been, and they consider Iran's definitive destruction as the big prize.
Many Iranians want human rights and democracy rather than a religious dictatorship. Many Iranians want a government with transparency and accountability and feel that the current one does not represent their interests sufficiently.
There's no dictatorship in Iran, but religious democracy.
Whilst secular liberal so-called "democracies" in reality are relatively non-coercive totalitarian systems which reduce their subjects to manipulated zombies and slaves blind to their own condition, and work in the exclusive interest of a 1% ruling oligarchy. They represent some of the most perverted, of the most perfidious and criminal regimes conceivable.
When the Islamic Republic was founded about half of Iranians could not read or write. Today most Iranians are literate, young and many well educated, Most Iranians alive today never even lived before the revolution, but they know that $1 used to be worth 70 rials in 1979 and they know that an Iranian passport used to be worth something, it was precious, the most sought after passport in the region. What about today ? Honestly if you travel and have multiple passports you're better off not having it with you.
Do they also know that Iran's infrastructures were multiplied several fold since the 1979 Revolution? Do they know of the hardly paralleled strides taken by Iran in the areas of industrialization, agriculture, public education, public health, science and technology? Are they aware that Iran is leading the Islamic world in scientific research? That Iran is now one of the most independent nations on earth, whereas the ousted monarchy had prime ministers chosen in the Oval Office, as well as its security apparatus and armed forces entirely set up and controlled by western regimes and Isra"el", whose interests Iran was doomed to serve?
This is worth much more than some passport that was completely irrelevant to the great majority of Iranians because they did not have the means to travel abroad in the first place. Or than the inflation rate, which does not change the fact that Iranians on average are enjoying higher living standards today than they used to during the previous, USA- and zionist-subservient regime.
and I am not an anti IR person... The IR system has gone off scale with religion and People of Iran who LOVE their culture are pushing back and the F*cking enemies are trying to fish in muddy waters..
