So first you shift your own words, and now you're trying to alter mine. Seriously believing this will cut it, which is the most amusing part. I'm afraid it won't though.
substantiated it by what you said , those dishes that you claim everyone have , or you think people use those dishes to watch those refreshing irib programs
I claimed "everyone" has them? Really?
I'm right everyone is wrong , got it
And you keep promoting monolithic imposition of liberal dogma upon the entire planet, with no room for dissent.
made problem fore those who wanted to get brainwashed in Azerbaijan and UAE after that they restricted irib reporters you can't expect you do everything you want and there be no consequences
For a couple of hours on a single Persian-language broadcaster. What absolute tragedy.
when you directly attack the satellites with parasites and made problem for their broadcast in all middle east , expect they do something about it and don't tolerate it .
Interestingly enough,to curtail the rights of Iranian media on their soil they've cited numerous bogus pretexts which have strictly nothing to do with the above. So you may try harder.
when they see a provocative woman in a harmless calligraphy and go to court to close the newspaper for 7 month its clear what they feared .
No, it's not and I offered an alternative explanation in my previous posts.
for how long nobody see it in that light untill some basij member see the provocation , guess why
Maybe because it was, according to you, an obscure paper which hardly anyone had heard of before.
yeah lack of adequate evidence don't mean it didn't happen specially concerning the nature of the incident and the fact it has happened show it clearly that there must been something
It's as flimsy an accusation as it can possibly get. Sources I shared demonstrate why.
You going out of your way to try and legitimize the stifling of Assange's freedom of speech, however, says all there is to know about your stance, does it not? Thus, according to your own previously expressed belief, you are not in a position to complain about any real or imagined infringement to free speech in Iran.
on the matter of suicide behind bar , well don't you think that happened several time in a certain islamic republic
No, I don't.
he was charged with rape admitted to it by escaping . the charge dropped because the nature of the incident make it hard to prove in court , if he didn't think there is some truth to the charge he would not have escaped
He escaped for he was fully aware it's because of the political relevance of his work that they were after him, and therefore they would have been capable of unjustly sentencing him. When the justice system is corrupted like in the west, you don't expect a fair trial.
But either way, Assange was not arrested under sexual assault charges. And the violation by western regimes, of his constitutionally guaranteed rights as a journalist is an undeniable reality. Which you seem bent on trying to sweep under the rug, for some reason.
are we talking about it was good act or bad act or we talk about it was legal or illegal . a question if i find access from confidential document from some courts in 60s and publish them in the name of lifting the veil , is my work accepted or I'm a criminal
We're talking about the fact that by your logic, western regimes would be enabled to trample with utter impunity every nice sounding principle they pretend to uphold. And in effect, that's what they're doing. We know, thanks to the likes of Snowden.
Now we also know it hardly bothers you when western regimes violate the very principles you randomly accuse the Iranian government of failing to implement.
you post a 14 sec cut down video and claimed it was evidence of police brutality in USA while the actual incident was 10min and include the guy abuse and attack police and driving under influence of intoxication do you knew how many such videos in last 3 week made about iran police
False. I never present that short sequence as "evidence of police brutality in the USA", but as an illustration of what the word 'hits' means - and you know it. The clip perfectly exemplified my point.
As for the events of the past three weeks in Iran, it started out with extreme violence against law enforcement forces and the latter largely holding back. Try having mobs in the USA stone law enforcement officers and kick them repeatedly to the head while they're on the ground, attack them with weapons, and make sure this takes place dozens of times across the country. The reaction of USA police would make anything witnessed in Iran look like a schoolyard brawl.
Europeans enlightment happened because of Islam .
No it didn't, and western tenets of Enlightenment are far removed from Islamic ones. They are, in fact, deeply antinomical.
and the death of western journalists by snipers was ordered by west I assume
You may argue along those lines when it comes to western journalists. Not when the victims happen to be affiliated with Iranian media, because in this case and unlike the latter ones, western regimes have a concrete motive to resort to violence. A geostrategic motive.
so you admit Syria killed opposition journalist and claim it was necessary that's enough
At this point you appear to be experiencing comprehension issues.
so now I can understand who was behind the death of journalist in that list that nobody accept responsibility for their death and i didn't put in 5 example list go and read that long list of reporters who were killed.
Feel free to delude yourself, if you so wish.
that's not an article written by the news paper another person said something and they reported it simple as that
that news is report a parliament member words , id fars and mashreq self censure it don't mean the other news paper are reformist or anything
It does say a lot about the reformist leanings of Hamshahri. Many people say many things on a daily basis. What a newspaper will select from amongst those statements, and what it will publish on its front page is determined by and reflective of its orientation.
Hamshahri will pick this one because it offers an opportunity to propagate criticism of the dress code and hejab law. Whilst at the same time, they will deliberately choose to stay silent on arguments made in favor of said regulations or, to echo your formulation, they'll exercise self-censorship in regards to the latter types of arguments. It's a liberal paper, after all.
but writing them have the danger
Revolutionary media have been coerced by liberal administrations as well. Revolutionary journalist have been physically assaulted, one was stabbed in the head around the time of the so-called "Green Movement" fitna because his views were not to the liking of liberals. Others like Vahid Yaminpur have been receiving death threats on a regular basis.
How insightful and convincing a retort.
the one ordinary hackers use being fixed soon and usa collect more on official and organization that like fools use windows for everything
Nothing going's to be fixed in Microsoft operating systems. Their hollow mantra that they're going to "fix it soon" has been heard for several decades and systematically turned out to be pure scam.
As for the USA regime, it's irrelevant what sort of internet users they're collecting more data on. They do keep logs on every sort of private user activity, especially of Iranians because the Washington regime's hostile towards Iran. So the above quoted contention doesn't affect my point.
and the same answer , if hacker use it , it mean its perograming bug and will be fixed in next update , the real spy backdoors are not known to hackers
Security vulnerabilities will never be eliminated from a device like smartphones, and hackers - let alone hostile western regimes, will never cease accessing the private data of smartphone users.
again LOL , never seen unrest in these area for last 2-3 weeks basij even don't bother come here anymore the unrest is in south of Tehran between lower echelon of society
Extraordinary restrictions to the internet in times of exceptional security challenges are very often applied on a nationwide basis. Fact is that the current security situation is the sole reason behind those connection issues you showed. And you know full well.
counters that mean nothing as they prove nothings
I'd very much doubt that, seeing how your assertions have been methodically debunked.
when you can't find anything that clear what else you can find , nothing , so there is no book on those matters that society care
Gratuitous statement.
that's where they allow you publish books
Incomprehensible.
again your obsession of vpn, they are illegal , what if I don't like do illegal things , why if i don't want spend money on those signs of corruption
You're using a VPN on here.
a judge, after a hearing not the case here
No, there's no "hearing" in many cases where organizations are banned in the west. They are spied upon by domestic intelligence services, "evidence" accumulated against them, a judgement passed, they're formally disbanded, their assets seized and that's it.
I remember it being questionable.
also the driver made those claims about being hit from back 2 years later and the accident according to police was heads on you claim otherwise prove it
Doesn't really matter at what point in time the purported driver's statement was made. You need to substantiate your claim that the version put forth by Turkish authorities is accurate. So far you've failed to do so.
you must ask yourself how she didn't have a single mark if the truck driver hit her on the order of NATO. honestly you here saying if NATO order your car crushed by a cement truck it won't leave a mark on you m if its an accident it leave marks on you. let me how there maybe no a single mark on your body , you die instantly , there wont be a single mark on you
I discovered her mother's declaration today. This of course opens up an entirely new set of hypotheses, including that Shim might have been killed in completely different circumstances, at another time and place.
You're free to assume, without a hint towards a possible underlying motivation let alone concrete proof, that her mother would've lied about it.
But accident or not, under both eventualities the NATO narrative looks extremely shaky. Nothing else could be expected from serial manipulators like these anyway.
no weigh it against the fact that the driver was underage and without driving license
the car and cement truck show clearly the nephew and all who say it was not a headon collision when the car was in wrong lane were liars
the truk was even in right side of his lane and its from side , the back of the car is intact again show the nephew was a liar and you only insist on the story because of your Nato obsession
This proves nothing much, it's well within the competence of a state to stage a scene like this for a photo op. Can be arranged in a few hours.
and western countries didn't killed any iranian journalist as you could not bring even one such cases
I mentioned two highly probable cases, where circumstances are heavily pointing to such assassinations. The victims just weren't Iranian, but were working for Iranian media.
in many cases had , and please name some
Tune into some western propaganda outlet. There are western journalists in Iran all the time.
