Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you don't let me close my mouth , Gaze on your ideal society and praise it more . 25% of GNP come from prostitution for USA force in 60s and 70sPrior to the Islamic Revolution the grass wasn't exactly green in Iran, it was wilted.
The Second Republic viewed prostitution as something of a necessity.[62] Starting in the 1960s, an official organized system was established to provide the U.S. military men with entertainment and leisure that fulfilled their sexual fantasies, such as peep shows and strip clubs.[35] Lawmakers of the National Assembly urged the South Korean government to train a supply of prostitutes for allied soldiers to prevent them from spending their dollars in Japan.[62] Lee Seung-u, the deputy home minister, gave a response to the National Assembly that the government had made some improvements in the "Supply of Prostitutes" for American soldiers.[62] These camptowns existed as a site for the American GIs R&R.
Park Chung-hee, who ruled South Korea during the 1960s and 1970s, and the father of the former president Park Geun-hye, encouraged the sex industry in order to generate revenue, particularly from the U.S. military.[65] Park seized power in the May 16 coup, and immediately enforced two core laws.[66] The first was the prostitution prevention law, which excluded "camp towns" from the governmental crackdown on prostitution; the second was the tourism promotion law, which designated camp towns as special tourism districts.[66]
During the 1960s, prostitutions and other related businesses generated nearly 25% of the South Korean GNP.[67] In 1962, 20,000 comfort women were registered.[1] The prostitutes attended classes sponsored by their government in English and etiquette to help them sell more effectively.[68] They were praised as "dollar-earning patriots" or "true patriots" by the South Korean government.[37][65][68] In the 1970s one junior high school teacher told his students that "The prostitutes who sell their bodies to the U.S. military are true patriots. Their dollars earned greatly contributes to our national economy. Don't talk behind their back that they are western princesses or U.N. madams."[22]
you brought that up and concluded because they start sooner , they must be more advance , i pointed out no we start later but at faster pace and in 78 we were ahead of them , by the way non of the car you mentioned designed by Koreans so don't talk about they designed a car .You were addressing the issue of a 1950's Korean automobile.
no your metric for advance is totally wrong , first the korean designed nothing foreign companies designed the cars , they just produced the low technological parts and then imported high technology part from west . also quality wise peykan was better than the two car you mentioned and was totally produced inside Iran in 1978Domestic acquisition of technology is more valuable than transfer of technology, which hinges upon the supplier's whim.
South Korea advanced because they opted for an export-substitution strategy.
no because the only intervention of government was law making not taking over the industry and put incompetent manager at the head of the company and those incompetent manager put more incompetent manager down the line and after they **** up the industry take begging bowl and go to government to use oil money to save them.South Korea advanced because they opted for an export-substitution strategy.
say someone who is outside iran and think iran actual GDP is 1.7 T $Changes nothing to the fact that the non-oil industries developed steadily after 1979. Numerous non-oil industries did not record any significant production setback after Trump-era sanctions, with many of them continuing on the path of expansion.
Also, I thought sanctions are favoring non-oil activities in the overall balance of Iranian industries, and that this is the "only reason" for these activities having a greater share now? So which is it?
the difference is now they import Chinese brands equipment and assemble them in iran and name them Iranian brands , before revolution they just sold them by original brand name when they assembled itIran has her own brands now, as opposed to pre-Revolution times. The previous regime was incapable of such an advancement and was fundamentally dependent upon on its western patrons.
clap for the achievement after 45 year , how many of them completely built in Iran , how many are designed by Iranian .Iran today is producing roughly six times the number of automobiles that she did in 1978.
they targeted Iran oil sale and central bank at the second term of AhmadinejadIllegal sanctions were first imposed in 1979 and they accumulated on a yearly basis, cope with it.
yeah that member assumed iran do imports maily by 42000 rial Dollar. you are welcome manage to import anything by that.This has been addressed at length in the appropriate thread, no need to run in circles. Moreover, a forum user made a detailed demonstration by examining the output of numerous industrial sectors in Iran and arrived at the conclusion that the IMF figures are more realistic than the World Bank ones. So kindly don't waste time with faulty ramblings like these.
yes but the teacher was thrown out of schools . the door and windows of classes were supposed to do the teachingThe teaching of profane disciplines wasn't interrupted.
fact is fact that they changed it each 5-10 year then decided the pre-revolution system was betterFacts are facts, even if the tremendous success they reflect on the Islamic Republic's part isn't to your liking.
you don't let me close my mouth , Gaze on your ideal society and praise it more . 25% of GNP come from prostitution for USA force in 60s and 70s
you brought that up and concluded because they start sooner , they must be more advance , i pointed out no we start later but at faster pace and in 78 we were ahead of them , by the way non of the car you mentioned designed by Koreans so don't talk about they designed a car .
no your metric for advance is totally wrong , first the korean designed nothing foreign companies designed the cars , they just produced the low technological parts and then imported high technology part from west . also quality wise peykan was better than the two car you mentioned and was totally produced inside Iran in 1978
no because the only intervention of government was law making not taking over the industry and put incompetent manager at the head of the company and those incompetent manager put more incompetent manager down the line and after they **** up the industry take begging bowl and go to government to use oil money to save them.
say someone who is outside iran and think iran actual GDP is 1.7 T $
the difference is now they import Chinese brands equipment and assemble them in iran and name them Iranian brands , before revolution they just sold them by original brand name when they assembled it
clap for the achievement after 45 year , how many of them completely built in Iran , how many are designed by Iranian .
they targeted Iran oil sale and central bank at the second term of Ahmadinejad
yeah that member assumed iran do imports maily by 42000 rial Dollar. you are welcome manage to import anything by that.
and a question for you why not central bank figures that i posted instead of 42000rial to imf why not obey the law and get rid of 42000R figure ?
its exactly like how ahmadinejad calculated people purchase power and concluded in his term people purchase power increased despite the inflation
yes but the teacher was thrown out of schools . the door and windows of classes were supposed to do the teaching
fact is fact that they changed it each 5-10 year then decided the pre-revolution system was better
in late 70 living in iran was a lot better than living in s. korea or Turkey no matter how some people want to spin it . go look at your utopia the 60s and 70s koreaA textbook oil-dependent banana state is what Iran used to be under the ousted monarchy, irregardless of how much its supporters will bury their heads in the sand and grasp at straws in a failed attempt to sugar-coat their beloved regime's abysmal record.
you exactly did that , you can go several page back and read your posts.I did not draw such a conclusion, but rather pointed to the fact that they'd been ahead for quite some time already.
it never had any domestic engineering input2) It had greater domestic engineering input than the Peykan ever did prior to 1979.
that was a private company what you expect ? and 100+ thousands for iran was not small at all. and beside that .As for your vaunted Peykan and its relatively low key production rate, it amounted to peanuts in Iran's overall economy, which kept remaining desperately dependent on crude oil sales.
non of iran big automobile maker are actually private . the real owner (government) is hiding behind of a web of Khosulati companiesMoreover, in Iran it was privatization of the automotive industry which resulted in a series of hitherto unseen issues, as perfectly demonstrated in the excellently researched documentary film Okhtapus.
talks that never actually materialized till the campaign of make Iran Great again started
they never happened have any problem with that go and bring that to the then MPs and Government official , i didn't have any official post.This is how insistently and how early on the Supreme Leader has been highlighting the necessity to transition away from oil. Far from a passive type of reaction to relatively recent UN sanctions or to Washington's so-called "maximum pressure" policy, this a proactive policy par excellence, rooted in the Islamic Revolution's unshakable belief system we're talking about (ramblings of some random liberal MP notwithstanding).
yes but his argument was based on a flawed assumption that Iran mainly import good with 4200t dollarThe user in question offered a flawless presentation by reviewing production volumes among other things. Your exchange rate interjection doesn't distort the overall picture with regards to domestic manufacturing, all the more so since a lot of what is consumed in Iran is produced domestically. This is no longer the pre-Revolution era when practically every high value added product needed had to be imported.
thanks to shah-abbas yes , if you want ed to learn medicine you had to go and fiind a doctor who was willing to teach you , if you wanted to learn how to build a bridge , you must go and learn from a mason . the problem with that is no longer you learn the basic science and you stop at that degree , there won\t be any advancement.Of course. With the advent of Shah Abbas, nothing was taught anywhere in Iran other than theology . Evil religious obscurantists!
yeah the success story of ghalam-chi and such . and the fact remain that they changed educational system each 5-10 year until they decided on pre-revolution educational system wonder what is it that you discuss here , you just need go and ask a teacher and he tell you the exact same thingFact is the success story of the Islamic Republic's education system is a truly longstanding one, and certainly no simple derivative of adopted of pre-revolutionary practices.
well some people must see it, i only say to the people who dream , Dream of Russia, that God wake them up.
Do you think Iran and North Korea are good allies? Russians answer.
@Hack-Hook persisting with his مرغ خوری arguments is humorous. Someone hire him at KFC. His منحرف commentary is exactly why it’s valuable. Iran today is FAR better off than pre revolution—chicken lickin’ good notwithstanding.in late 70 living in iran was a lot better than living in s. korea or Turkey no matter how some people want to spin it . go look at your utopia the 60s and 70s korea
at least iran monarch didn come and encourage women to sell themselves to Americans and call the ones who did it patriot , even when the oil price was so low in 60s that the country have serious problem meeting the budget.
you exactly did that , you can go several page back and read your posts.
it never had any domestic engineering input
that was a private company what you expect ? and 100+ thousands for iran was not small at all. and beside that .
non of iran big automobile maker are actually private . the real owner (government) is hiding behind of a web of Khosulati companies
talks that never actually materialized till the campaign of make Iran Great again started
they never happened have any problem with that go and bring that to the then MPs and Government official , i didn't have any official post.
yes but his argument was based on a flawed assumption that Iran mainly import good with 4200t dollar
thanks to shah-abbas yes , if you want ed to learn medicine you had to go and fiind a doctor who was willing to teach you , if you wanted to learn how to build a bridge , you must go and learn from a mason . the problem with that is no longer you learn the basic science and you stop at that degree , there won\t be any advancement.
and i never call shah-abbas a religious man , i clearly explained why he did that , it seems you opted not to read it
yeah the success story of ghalam-chi and such . and the fact remain that they changed educational system each 5-10 year until they decided on pre-revolution educational system wonder what is it that you discuss here , you just need go and ask a teacher and he tell you the exact same thing
maybe , but life in south Korea and turkey today's is not comparable with what it was in 70s.@Hack-Hook persisting with his مرغ خوری arguments is humorous. Someone hire him at KFC. His منحرف commentary is exactly why it’s valuable. Iran today I s FAR better off than pre revolution—chicken lickin’ good notwithstanding.
That's why I posted it.well some people must see it, i only say to the people who dream , Dream of Russia, that God wake them up.
in late 70 living in iran was a lot better than living in s. korea or Turkey no matter how some people want to spin it . go look at your utopia the 60s and 70s korea
at least iran monarch didn come and encourage women to sell themselves to Americans and call the ones who did it patriot , even when the oil price was so low in 60s that the country have serious problem meeting the budget.
you exactly did that , you can go several page back and read your posts.
it never had any domestic engineering input
that was a private company what you expect ? and 100+ thousands for iran was not small at all. and beside that .
non of iran big automobile maker are actually private . the real owner (government) is hiding behind of a web of Khosulati companies
talks that never actually materialized till the campaign of make Iran Great again started
they never happened have any problem with that go and bring that to the then MPs and Government official , i didn't have any official post.
yes but his argument was based on a flawed assumption that Iran mainly import good with 4200t dollar
thanks to shah-abbas yes , if you want ed to learn medicine you had to go and fiind a doctor who was willing to teach you , if you wanted to learn how to build a bridge , you must go and learn from a mason . the problem with that is no longer you learn the basic science and you stop at that degree , there won\t be any advancement.
and i never call shah-abbas a religious man , i clearly explained why he did that , it seems you opted not to read it
yeah the success story of ghalam-chi and such . and the fact remain that they changed educational system each 5-10 year until they decided on pre-revolution educational system wonder what is it that you discuss here , you just need go and ask a teacher and he tell you the exact same thing
Do you think Iran and North Korea are good allies? Russians answer.
never encouraged by government or head of state go to parliament and say its necessary or call them patriots. something between two adult people and by the way not in ww2 time also it didn't happen on cabaret , but want me post about what they did in Mashhad that let to an uprising and attack on boarding house that housed pilgrims from IraqDon't worry, the Americans took their share of Iranian women for free during the occupation of Iran in WW2, under the watch of the shah.
Neither were Shahre-No and the Laleh-Zar cabarets off limits to Americans.
Oh, did I mention the story of the mighty Imperial Army's general whose wife some US military person stationed in Iran took into his limousine right in the middle of a reception party in Tehran, her powerless husband lowering his gaze in humiliation? Do I need to elaborate?
Yes, these were normal conditions under the US vassal regime you're trying to sugar-coat
go back and read what you posted ,Not really. And it's not the first time you're losing track of the discussion thread.
say the ones who designed itIt sure did.
nothing , hundreds of private companies not just one , those private companies were profitable and were expanding business before governmental management after it they began loosing money , many went bankrupt.....So what happened to your "private economy" mantra? Not the panacea you've been making it out to be, eh?
in name only and my source of information is not moviesThe Iran Khodro owners are private individuals. Watch Okhtapus.
never backtracked anything again if you go one or two page back you see i clearly stated government every year after the war was promissing cut reliance on the oil in budget and failed , they talked again about it next year and again failed , until the campaign f make Iran Great Again by Obama and TrumpNice backtracking, congrats. You went from "the Islamic Republic never believed in diversifying the economy" to "muh, it never materialized until Trump's sanctions".
reality is clear in Iran budget in the talks in your post if it happened supreme leader didn't had to talk about it 5 time each year to remains government about it.They never happened in your uninformed take. Reality tells a different story though.
yes but with the wrong assumption that iran imports are mainly done by 42000r / DollarAddressed that. Your objection's faulty.
name one Iranian school that taught those until amirkabir fixed itThe rest of your allegations imply that this story too ought to be taken with a pinch of salt pending further research.
only in your mindThe narrative you've reproduced is scapegoating religious elements, irregardless of their identity. Heard this sort of stuff elsewhere and know what sot of quarters they generally originate from, hence my circumspection.
As mr. Khomeyni once said God awaken those who dream of USA , I say to you God awaken who dreams of RussiaA brief look at the source of this dubious piece is enough to see through the actual farce it represents.
Some other tendentious questions put to Russians by this YouTube channel:
"Why do you think millions of people left Russia?" ("Why do you think millions of people left Iran?")
"Why did we annex Ukrainian regions if it wasn't the goal?" ("Why did we interfere in regional countries' affairs if it wasn't the goal?")
"Do you know how much we spend on the war?" ("Do you know how much we spend on Gaza and Lebanon?")
"Why is our economy so weak?" ("Why is our economy so weak while it was so strong under the shah?" = "Ask our partners Manoto and Saudi International!")
Enough said. The common enemy is active in Russia through its liberal fifth column as much as it is Iran through the reformists and company. Both Islamic Iran and Russia tolerate this sort of dissent, whose playbook is as old as it is getting tired - turn Iranians against their partners (Russia, China) and allies (the Resistance), turn Russians against Iran and China, Belarus etc. Doesn't make any of it much more credible though, at least to those familiar with NATO and zionist psy-ops / propaganda schemes.
I would be careful about casting judgment so quickly, you can find plenty of similar videos of Americans, that make it look like Americans are the dumbest people on the planet, but they infact have alot of smart people.That's why I posted it.
Most people here seem to forget that Russians are not our friends, have never been, will never be, and in fact, history wise, they have been one of our worst enemies. And they continue to be indifferent towards us and the public opinion has always been negative about Iran.
never encouraged by government or head of state go to parliament and say its necessary or call them patriots. something between two adult people and by the way not in ww2 time also it didn't happen on cabaret , but want me post about what they did in Mashhad that let to an uprising and attack on boarding house that housed pilgrims from Iraq
say the ones who designed it
When the company wanted to develop their own car, they hired George Turnbull, the former managing director of Austin Morris at British Leyland in 1974.[2] He in turn hired five other top British car engineers, Kenneth Barnett as body designer, engineers John Simpson and Edward Chapman, John Crosthwaite as chassis engineer and Peter Slater as chief development engineer.[3][4] With Turnbull's experience with the Morris Marina,[5] engines and transmissions from Mitsubishi, some parts from the Ford Cortina they were already producing, and a hatchback body styled by Italdesign Giugiaro, they developed the Hyundai Pony.
The Pony was loosely based on both the earlier licence-built Ford Cortinas and the Morris Marina, with former British Leyland engineers being hired by Hyundai to design the car.
nothing , hundreds of private companies not just one , those private companies were profitable and were expanding business before governmental management after it they began loosing money , many went bankrupt.....
in name only and my source of information is not movies
never backtracked anything again if you go one or two page back you see i clearly stated government every year after the war was promissing cut reliance on the oil in budget and failed , they talked again about it next year and again failed , until the campaign f make Iran Great Again by Obama and Trump
reality is clear in Iran budget in the talks in your post if it happened supreme leader didn't had to talk about it 5 time each year to remains government about it.
yes but with the wrong assumption that iran imports are mainly done by 42000r / Dollar
name one Iranian school that taught those until amirkabir fixed it
only in your mind
As mr. Khomeyni once said God awaken those who dream of USA , I say to you God awaken who dreams of Russia
Russian media should promote Iran better, and perhaps promote more tourism opportunities between our countries. This is really down to Russian Media not paying much attention to Iran aside from military dimension. It's hard for any European country to get close to Iran, because we are different, simply. They will always be closer to other European people and it is only logical.