yeah , albania , cyprus , iceland , ireland ,Likhten stein , malta ,....
Not exactly.
look at every country the initial advancement is a lot harder than the advance in middle of the road and then they again slow down
Even under such a hypothesis the Islamic Republic achieved comparatively superior results.
The Hyundai Pony was no longer produced in the 1990's.
tell you something , when a foreign company leave the country they had to look for another foreign partner to being able to continue production
Unrelated to the level of technology involved.
Why dream of it when it's reality:
We're told around 50 per cent of the Sibal's engine (...) was produced in Korea
Meet the first ever Korean car
www.topgear.com
yes completely korean design
Did I use the phrase "completely Korean design"? However it incorporated more indigenous engineering than the Peykan ever did prior to the Islamic Revolution and that's a fact.
Iran National's 1978 purchase of a production license for engines was not the extraordinary industrial feat some would make it out to be. It involved little domestic effort and essentially boiled down to PGCC-style spending of petroleum windfall on foreign supplied services. Westerners sold Iran the needed documentation and machinery, westerners set up the production line, westerners trained Iranian technicians on how to use it, and Iran National paid them license fees for every engine produced. That's quite the money flowing into the pockets of western companies.
Such a scheme was well within the reach of south Korean automotive producers as well. They however chose a strategy that would prove its worth in the following years.
show us the correct chart if you can , its the hard bitter fact of inefficient Ahmadinejad government
I don't actually need to, because the mere citation of wild allegations about Iran issued by the US regime, automatically disqualifies any argument based thereupon. It's been established beyond doubt that hostile powers have had a rather nasty habit of churning out manipulated reports on practically every topic related to Iran, and that they've systematically been attempting to downplay the Islamic Republic's achievements.
But just so Iranians won't be misled by the fictitious numbers put forth by the enemy, here the accurate ones:
https://www.eghtesadnews.com/بخش-اخبار-اقتصادی-67/502737-سهم-اندک-بخش-صنعت-در-رشد-اقتصادی-ایران
In other terms, by attributing roughly "80%" of Iran's industrial output to crude oil, the US regime's Energy Information Agency is arbitrarily adding an absurd 55% (!) excess share to the sector, whilst in reality it accounts for no more than 25% of total industrial manufacturing in Iran (crude oil and gas represented 7,9% of the overall Iranian economy in 1400, which amounts exactly to one third of the 23,7% made up by the non-crude oil and gas industries).
In fact the EIA's shameless piece of disinformation perfectly describes the state of Iran's industries under the US-subservient Pahlavi regime, including in the 1970's. There's propaganda and propaganda, this however truly hits rock bottom.
As for the Ahmadinejad administration it performed rather well in the economic field during its first tenure, with non-oil branches such as steel experiencing unprecedented growth.
you don't get it , Molla-Sadra was also a religious figure , at the time there was two narrative inside Iran education systems which was a combination of What today you call religious study and modern study . one group believed that they must focus on religious study as its come in hadith and Quran , the other insisted in they must ask question about those teaching and find the reason for them with modern studies both of them were the same amount religious but had different taste . King Abbas and later Safavide kings saw they can control the ones who insisted on teaching علوم نقلی a lot easier than the group who taught them along side علوم عقلی . so they start a campaign of marginalizing them and in just one generation eliminating them from Iran higher education system as a result science like mathematics , physics and biology eliminated from what taught at schools and they the schools that produced people like Ave-Cina , Georgani , Khawrazmi and ... start producing governmental clerics and medics who were only do dubious practice and it resulted in the country fall back. for years those school failed to produced any prominent scientist or clerics
Underlying these interpretations of history is a contrasting juxtaposition of faith and reason, of Islamic tradition and "progress" in the sense of the 17th-18th century theories of so-called "Enlightenment" which took shape in the west. It's the reading of the discussed episode that's questionable, as if the operative line of divide was defined by this particular set of criteria.
The
reason for Islamic teachings is not to be found in profane science, for the latter does not precede human submission to the Almighty. At best can profane science serve as an additional layer to the foundations of our faith, but in this regard it can never be considered as foundational onto itself. Otherwise the door would be wide open to interpretative subversion, at a latter stage even to attempted "refutation" of
din. A historic thought process observed in the freemason-dominated west as well as in other secularist polities.
only if you wanted to see the truth . just look at how Russia managed foreign sanction and how Iran did it .
if its not mismanagement then what is it.
A government achieving as many milestones as the Islamic Republic is hardly the most prone to mismanagement now is it.
and that must have been enough incentive for the fairly intact industry to flourish and fix the damage , if they were managed correctly
No administration can make industries 'flourish' when an economy the size of Iran's is taking hits to the tune of $1000 billion. The above quote resembles a broken window fallacy.
the war advance the technology in the country on war related material that it can later applied to other sector , that was not the case of Iran.
The abstract clearly states that the six wars they studied had a negative impact on investment, seeing how it came to be directed towards less productive industries as a result of these conflicts. In the context of the eight-year war imposed on her, Iran formed no exception to this occurrence.
www.nbcnews.com
