Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Chances are the Axis of Resistance will follow the same 'Five Eyes' pattern -- as it should.I agree with your point but also being WASP matters. White Anglo Saxon Protestant.
Canada, Aussie, UK: same blood
Iran and Russia are not like that. Heck Russia has not even done that for Belarus.
When Britts were making ships and having 10 kids each in their faraway colonies, guess what we were doing?
Sectarian and tribal fights
Zionists infiltrated the Evangelical Christians in the U.S in the early 1900s when the Scofield "bible" was first published by the Stanford publishing house. This fraudulent bible is full of lies that claim that those who stand with Israel, will be blessed by God and those who stands against Israel will be cursed by God. This is were all the "Christian Zionists" come out of.There are lots of work to make a United judeochristian entity.
However that Ashkenazi would not find similar beliefs out in the farms in redneck counties.
If you don’t believe in Jesus Christ, son of god, the Lord; it is over.
Even more interesting is what happened in the early 1980s when Ariel Sharon was the prime minister of Israel.Zionists infiltrated the Evangelical Christians in the U.S in the early 1900s when the Scofield "bible" was first published by the Stanford publishing house. This fraudulent bible is full of lies that claim that those who stand with Israel, will be blessed by God and those who stands against Israel will be cursed by God. This is were all the "Christian Zionists" come out of.
Amazing. But then again, I expect nothing less from you, borther.
Iranian people can ONLY count on themselves. If they count on this b.s. that calls itself international order, or NPT, or IAEA, or global trade, global banking and transaction processing, etc. etc. - we will ONLY be disappointed or even worse, humiliated.
Here is a Video to go with the Topic
The US protects its major allies and promotes tech transfers to the “white ones”. Meanwhile Russia and China have yet to build a similar alliance.
If they ever want to effectively challenge a US led world order they need to embrace countries like Iran and NK just as US embraces France and England and Australia.
I doubt Russia will ever get to that point, their philosophy since Soviet Union has ensured it is alone and lost almost all of its former client states (Libya, Iraq, etc) while being enricled by NATO and losing former satellite states of the Soviet Union. This lone wolf policy by Russia has been nothing short of a disaster for its long term prospects.
That leaves China and all indications are China thinks it can challenge the US and it’s led world order all by itself by economically enslaving poor countries as part of its Silk Road project. Unfortunately, while China has done many things right to reach the point it is today. I feel this is a critical flaw (call it arrogance) on its part if it thinks it can challenge the US and it’s allies all by itself. Imperial Japan tried this and failed miserably
While China today is magnitudes more powerful than Imperial Japan was. So too is the US + NATO + Asia alliance.
Zionists infiltrated the Evangelical Christians in the U.S in the early 1900s when the Scofield "bible" was first published by the Stanford publishing house. This fraudulent bible is full of lies that claim that those who stand with Israel, will be blessed by God and those who stands against Israel will be cursed by God. This is were all the "Christian Zionists" come out of.
Even more interesting is what happened in the early 1980s when Ariel Sharon was the prime minister of Israel.
In those days there was an offer by the "Evangelical Christians" to the israeli Jews....the offer was simple...accept the "Evangelical Christians" money and political support in return for allowing them to operate freely in the holy land to fulfill the prophesy of the "End Times".
Israelis had a hard time accepting all that free gifts!!!.because the "End Times" prophesy concludes with all the Jews either to be slaughtered or converted... so they debated and debated....and at the end they accepted (surprise ..surprise!!).. and that is how "Christian Zionists" came to being....
If China is binding countries along the Silk Road to itself through economic interaction, is this policy not already creating a geostrategic bloc of sorts? Formal military alliance could follow in the future. I don't think China is indifferent to it, but it is probably waiting for the right moment ie for the gap between it and the US to narrow a little more. Because officially forming and announcing such an alliance represents a considerable challenge to the NATO-dominated global order.
Zionists infiltrated the Evangelical Christians in the U.S in the early 1900s when the Scofield "bible" was first published by the Stanford publishing house. This fraudulent bible is full of lies that claim that those who stand with Israel, will be blessed by God and those who stands against Israel will be cursed by God. This is were all the "Christian Zionists" come out of.
Some good points made. But a military alliance made up of a various 3rd world countries that China has created an economic integration alliance with (Africa, South America, etc) will never challenge a US + NATO+ Asia from a military alliance POV.
Take SCO for example, relatively useless as the basis of a future NATO-esque military alliance when you have Pakistan and India in the “alliance”....two sworn enemies. It’s like if Israel joined SCO.
Currently the US led military order is as follows:
US
NATO
Israel
India
Australia
Canada
SK
Japan
Philippines
Arab banana countries (Egypt, Saudi, PGCC)
vs
China
No superpower on Earth could hold up against this front. Nazi attempted Empire made a similar mistake and paid the price.
Thus it makes sense for the following
China
-Iran
-(HZ-Iraqi militias, Syrian militias, Hamas, Houthi Resistance alliance)
-Russia
-NK
Wildcards (potential to flip to axis side)
-Turkey
-Pakistan
Realistically this is the only way to provide military deterrence and allow Chinese led world order to emerge. Or else building only a economic deterrence by ways of Silk Road Integration of various countries will not provide suffice deterrence from an attack.
Remember the white man “acts” civilized because social norms calls for it. But when it’s security and livelihood are challenged they will not hesitate to turn back into savages in order to protect their way of life.
Some good points made. But a military alliance made up of a various 3rd world countries that China has created an economic integration alliance with (Africa, South America, etc) will never challenge a US + NATO+ Asia from a military alliance POV.
Take SCO for example, relatively useless as the basis of a future NATO-esque military alliance when you have Pakistan and India in the “alliance”....two sworn enemies. It’s like if Israel joined SCO.
Currently the US led military order is as follows:
US
NATO
Israel
India
Australia
Canada
SK
Japan
Philippines
Arab banana countries (Egypt, Saudi, PGCC)
vs
China
No superpower on Earth could hold up against this front. Nazi attempted Empire made a similar mistake and paid the price.
Thus it makes sense for the following
China
-Iran
-(HZ-Iraqi militias, Syrian militias, Hamas, Houthi Resistance alliance)
-Russia
-NK
Wildcards (potential to flip to axis side)
-Turkey
-Pakistan
Realistically this is the only way to provide military deterrence and allow Chinese led world order to emerge. Or else building only a economic deterrence by ways of Silk Road Integration of various countries will not provide suffice deterrence from an attack.
Remember the white man “acts” civilized because social norms calls for it. But when it’s security and livelihood are challenged they will not hesitate to turn back into savages in order to protect their way of life.
There's Russia in the SCO, a developed country. But the SCO isn't exactly a NATO-type military alliance.
NATO includes Turkey and Greece, two traditional enemies whose forces have continued to skirmish even after joining the alliance.
The Philippines is an interesting example. Although they do have a mutual defence pact with Washington, President Duterte has tried to distance his country from the US. Also, in the face of Chinese intrusion into territory claimed by the Philippines, not only have the latter's armed forces proven to lack any sort of deterrence power, but their American allies equally failed to keep China out despite their treaty obligations.
The U.S.-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty and Philippine External Defense Forces - Foreign Policy Research Institute
On the face of it, the Philippines’ security situation is somewhat puzzling. The country has a mutual defense treaty with the United States, the world’s strongest military power. Yet, China regularly intrudes into what the Philippines claims as its territorial waters in the South China Sea...www.fpri.org
Washington and its Arab allies aren't bound by mutual defence accords. The militaries of these states are of regional relevance at best and as such would do not really count as a deterrence force against China.
Nor would the zionist regime participate in a serious operation against China. It'd most likely sit on the fences, play both sides and draw benefit from their clash. In fact, zionists are busy sending out their pawns into China as we speak. In a very methodical and discrete manner, as per their habits. There are also significant links between the globalist oligarchy and China's economic elites.
Some hints are visible here and there... For instance, China may be in the process of moving towards the legalization of homosexual unions and child adoptions by homosexual couples. Likewise, it seems like the groundwork for extra-continental mass immigration is slowly being laid in certain Chinese urban areas such as the Guangdong / Pearl River Delta megalopolis - along with the same engineered theatrics of racism vs anti-racism, which we know western oligarchies are busying their populations with, in order to redirect the revolutionary energy of the working class towards futile intra-class struggles on an "ethnic" instead of an economic basis. We also have the subtle encroachment of the Haifan Bahai organization in China, with a particular view to targeting successful and wealthy business people for conversion and recruitment. In the same way, marriages between influential zionist and Chinese individuals have sharply increased over the past years. But, this is a complex topic of its own.
https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/why-china-raising-prospect-same-sex-marriage-n1109471
https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/501588.shtml
India, for its part, is indeed being groomed by the US in a frontline deterrence role against China. However face to face with China, India has amply demonstrated its vulnerabilities.
Germany during WW2 had allies, collectively referred to as the so-called Axis Powers:
- Germany
- Italy
- Japan
- Finland
- Hungary
- Slovakia
- Romania
- Bulgaria
Many of these countries having in fact annexed large swaths of territory from their neighbors, ie they were larger and relatively speaking more populous than in their present form. Of course, France and the UK had far more extensive colonial possessions; but then again, these colonies experienced quasi non-stop demographic expansion at much faster pace than the west since the end of the war, thus they weren't particularly populous back in the day (with the exception of the British Raj in India).
From England to India and from the Baltic States to Croatia and Serbia, some hundreds of thousands of volunteers joined moreover the ranks of the Waffen-SS. Quite unbelievably, there were even Russian volunteers fighting against the USSR (see Kaminiski Brigade).
Thus it makes sense for the following
China
-Iran
-(HZ-Iraqi militias, Syrian militias, Hamas, Houthi Resistance alliance)
-Russia
-NK
Wildcards (potential to flip to axis side)
-Turkey
-Pakistan
Realistically this is the only way to provide military deterrence and allow Chinese led world order to emerge. Or else building only a economic deterrence by ways of Silk Road Integration of various countries will not provide suffice deterrence from an attack.
Remember the white man “acts” civilized because social norms calls for it. But when it’s security and livelihood are challenged they will not hesitate to turn back into savages in order to protect their way of life.
I'm not against the above suggested idea of an alliance between China and the mentioned countries and movements. This said, on the other side there's a considerable imbalance between the US and its allies. So I don't know how much of a difference it would make for a country the size of China. For example, France and the UK put together have only slightly more than 500 nuclear weapons officially vs America's over 5500, in other terms they add less than 10% to the US regime's nuclear power. In terms of defence budgets, in 2020 other NATO countries spent about a third of America's over 780 billion USD. Add south Korea, Japan and Australia, and that's "only" some additional 120 billion.
Do not look at military budget as power status or else Iran would look like a pushover at merely $20B defense budget annually.
Look at manpower, navy ships, air power.
Manpower alone between India, SK, Japan could muster = 1-1.5M soldiers.
NATO = 750K-1M soldiers (Turkey alone could supply 400K)
US 1-1.5M soldiers
So an allied force could muster 4M soldiers including reservists. Where as China would be at about 1M or so before having to draft regular civilians.
Again this is a “world war” scenario aka a “all hands on decks”
Between the Allied forces alone, allies could muster at least 5000+ military aircraft to China’s 1500.
Another issue is China like Imperial Japan has an oil problem. (Indeed one reason for Pearl Harbor was oil sanctions had crippled Japanese war machine). While China does have an emergency reserve (exact amount is state secret) securing additional oil to not crash its local economy during a prolonged war effort would be very difficult. Not to mention allies would attack onshore oil storage in the beginning of conflict knowing energy is its weakest link.
Thus we arrive at my original point. Removing nuclear weapons out of the equation (even tactical would open a Pandora’s box that China may be hesitant to do in the beginning). China will need allies, alone it cannot hope to stand against the United effort of the world.
Like I said individually US allies pose not a major threat to China, however together with addition of US the swarm alliance becomes much more lethal in unison and synergistic effect.
Thus until China develops alliances it will never reach world order leader status. Merely economic superpower status which does not exactly translate to world order leader status. It will have big say at the table, but not the FINAL say and that right there is key.