the ground work for those disaster whs in place at the time of Khrushchev and Gurbachev a strong police state masked it . after the fall of USSR those coruption in official allowed mafia to get in power and the did the sex slavery
A strong state prevented these abuses from materializing. A state deliberately weakened at the hands of liberals made them possible.
the corruption was there it was not started at the time of yeltsin, it had nothing to do with liberals
It was multiplied several fold by Yeltsin's liberal policies. Implementing liberal policies under those conditions is what proved really fatal for Russia.
he European were also liberal , those policy was also implemented in countries like east Germany after unification and also check and Slovakia and some other but the sex slavery didn't happened there
Everywhere in Europe there is sex slavery and mafias trading human beings. It happened and happens everywhere over here. It's part and parcel of western capitalism.
East Germany was immediately integrated into one of the world's foremost economic powerhouses, and yet even now after 30 years many of the east-west inequalities caused by savage liberal policies have still not been curbed.
As for tiny Slovenia, it's nothing but an appendix of the German and Italian economies ever since it was integrated into these countries' extended economic zones in 1991, quite unlike the Russian Federation. Which in turn means that Slovenia has no real economic sovereignty nor independence, and that crises generated in the west will affect it disproportionately and durably, like in 2009. And Slovenia represents a singular exception among former Yugoslav republics... As for the other ex-federate entities of Yugoslavia, let's not even go there (they were plunged into engineered wars by western imperialist powers).
the demise was started after Lenin it accelerated by Stalin . ussr could not mass produce quality material , all the products wee lower tier . their people rather used east European product than using Russian ones. they opted for Iron curtains to hide it from the world (what you advertise for Iran) and it failed miserably . just compare any of Russian equipment with their western counterpart and you see the difference
The supposed quality of products manufactured inside a country is the ultimate barometer of how viable that country's political system is? Many countries aren't capable of manufacturing products of similar quality as the main economic powers of the world, and yet their political systems aren't threatened by collapse.
Lenin with his capitalist NEP ("New Economic Policy") was not serious. However under Stalin, the political stability of the USSR was flawless. Until a domestic cabal, culminating with Gorbachev, progressively threw this stability under the bus by distancing itself more and more from the order put into place by Stalin.
And if you don't call mass uprising in what happened in eastern Europe then I don't knew what you'll call mass uprising.
Because I was discussing the reasons behind the collapse of the USSR, not Warsaw Pact countries. But what happened in those countries, was mostly a series of CIA-orchestrated "colored revolutions" (in fact, the very first applications of this subversive scheme), complete with false flag operations and propagandistic psy-ops efforts such as the totally fictive "massacre of Timisoara" which never took place, along with photographs from an ordinary morgue which were falsely portrayed as depicting victims of Securitate.
Not unlike the so-called "Green movement" in Iran, which failed miserably.
no one can compete with the fund that khatam Al-Anbia construction had access too maybe boniad and we saw when boniad facilated those funds in a right direction and financed Tehran University in producing Corona Virus Vaccine how faster they managed to build the vaccine than IRGC and let me tell you something don't ever think noora vaccine can reach to barkat vaccine.
I doubt that Khatam ol-Anbia's budget surpasses that of governmental ministries involved in construction work.
Bonyads share the same philosophy as the IRGC. They are revolutionary para-state foundations, not private sector actors. Which is why reformists and centrists dislike them as much as they dislike the IRGC.
you give fund to civilian and private sector and you see how fat your problem will be solved . keep it in the hand of government and armed force and you see how easily you fall back . the duty of government is giving direction to private sector , not competing with them
The private sector is for the most part a thieving entity whose existential goal is to enrich itself, not to serve the common interest. Which is why western capitalism as of today is based on fiat money, financial bubbles, printing press and systemic corruption. Which is why it is collapsing, and why its oligarchs must devise insane "great reset" policies to try and provide this decaying system with a new lease on life.
A government's duty is to serve the common good. Not to compete with anyone, but to actually take over essential tasks related to the fulfillment of the common good, something the private sector systematically fails at achieving due to its self-serving nature. There is no magical, self-regulating "invisible hand" as postulated by classical economists, nor any "trickle down" phenomenon. These are smoke and mirrors devised by capitalist hoaxters.
One just need to compare the performance of Iran's automobile industries, for example, with that of Khatam ol-Anbiya to see who is the true problem solver and who isn't.
our deterrence was not just our missiles , it was diverse , it was our economy , our political power , our ground force our navy , our air force , not only missile force.
I clearly stated "main asset of Iran's deterrence", which implies there have been others. However, the ballistic missiles were and are the centerpiece of Iran's defence architecture. It's them, not Iran's subs nor its anti-ship missiles (the rest of the Iranian navy has had no deterrence value against the US), nor Iran's air force, nor Iran's ground force that in case of a war would enable Iran to counteract the foundation of US military doctrine ie its air force, insofar as these missiles would be used to target the enemy's air bases, without which its air power would be neutered.
As for the economy, it's that same economy which is decried by liberals as "state controlled".
and by the way our deterrence is more in line of our proxies than missile force its in line with that we knew when to take a step back and be flexible.
Indeed, the same network of regional allies which liberals such as Rafsanjani or Khatami were ready to trade away in unequal deals with the US regime. It's Sepah and the Quds Force not anyone else which created, expanded and are now keeping alive this network of allies. Liberals on the other hand are seeking to dismantle it.
communism is against human nature and God teaching and that make it weak , you can keep it up by force for sometime but in the end it will kill innovation and the will to improve.
And so is liberalism. It is profoundly incompatible with Islamic teachings, with human nature as well as with natural law. Imam Khomeini (rA) in his famous letter to ayatollah Montazeri denounced liberalism and liberals in the most explicit terms possible. Liberalism is a perversion and one of the most dangerous ideological phenomena in the history of mankind.
why the western media is strong ? why its words are appealing to the masses have you asked why .
For the same reason National-Socialist media were appealing to German audiences in the 1930's. For the same reason Bolshevik media were attracting Russian masses in the early 20th century.
A system based on usury and exploitation of humans, which is haram, will not subsist. Liberalism is going to disappear like all these other deviations.
