Well there is no picture / video evidence to prove that any S-300 systems were destroyed.
On the other hand, looking at this website,
https://www.lostarmour.info/karabakh/
66% of losses are Armenian and 33% are Azeri. However that site isn't a glass ball and doesn't show everything.
I've seen countless videos with piles and truck loads of azeri soldiers bodies. I've also seen videos showing Azeri mass retreats in the face of stiff Armenian resistance. A few days ago the Armenians claimed 3000+ Azeris had died on the field.
Logically if you think about it, Azerbaijan tried to push forward on the entire front. The were only able to have a little success in 2 areas on the border.
Keep in mind Armenia has fighter jets with BVR capability and air defense systems. At first the Azeris saturated the skies but allegedly they lost over 100+ drones, helicopters, loitering munitions (Harop UAVs from Israel), aircraft
In the first few days we saw tons of UAV footage. After the first week, we saw footage trickle down and attempts by Azerbaijan to recycle various angles and old strikes as new ones. At one point they even showed reconnaissance footage with no impact footage and tried to pass it off as genuine strike footage.
If even half of the casualty count stated by Armenians is true, that would explain why
A) after the first few days Azerbaijan began targeting civilians (out of frustration)
B) Azerbaijan has been caught putting out fake evidence, like the alleged Armenian strikes on the power station and pipelines which both turned out to be fake
C) why Azerbaijan chose to go along with a ceasefire
Remember the Azeri army is 50,000 strong. 3000+ killed would mean several times that number, atleast double, were injured. Close to 10,000 deaths and injuries in about 1 week of fighting ? That would be 20%.
Even if half is true, 10% ? That's pretty devastating.
Armenia will lose more land, unless a deal is made. Don’t fool yourself with biased news. Armenia has lost 70 T72 and parts of S300.
Without direct Russian help or help of others in EU, NK is gone in 2-3 months. Land matters the most in this war.
Wrong. This just shows that you don't understand the Pakistani mindset. Actually no one here on this thread understands it except for Philosopher and Aspen.
Pakistanis keep their head down and work for their country, we don't bother with these sectarian and racial rivalries in the ME. Our loyalty is only to Islam.
Turks, Arabs, and Iranians are hands down some of the nicest and most down to Earth people I have ever met. In regards people to people relations, we get along fine.
How can we racially hate the Iranians? They are related to us. We have ancient ties.
I did not stumble on it, I heard it in a lecture from a respected Islamic Scholar and did some research on it.
I will look for the source and I'll tag you later when I find it.
I would not put too much weight on Wikipedia.
Why? Farsi is also one of our native languages. All my grandparents and ancestors spoke Farsi fluently. Mostly the kind spoken in Afghanistan today.
If you had allowed Farsi script for Bengal, you guys would also be able to appreciate Farsi poetry as we do. Unfortunately BD had a language movement to remove Arabic and Farsi influence and return to Pali influences.
The problem is 800,000 Azeris were removed from Nagorno-Karabakh, and more importantly, its surrounding Armenian occupied areas, all to exert dominance over 150,000 Armenians.
Don't you feel that is unjust?
The Azeris did not kill Armenians or desecrate churches as Armenians did to them.
800,000 can't be right. There are 150,000 people in that region today and before the breakup 75% were Armenian. Azerbaijan has been caught faking evidence this time on a massive scale so I don't believe their numbers at all.
Azerbaijan, after the first few days began bombing civilian institutions on purpose. They also targeted a historic Church with airstrikes.
The "alleged" Armenian strikes on the pipeline and power station have been proven to be fake by analysts.
The targeting of civilians was most likely one out of sheer frustration, because of lack of progress on the front. Azeris tried to progress on multiple fronts, on the entire border. They were able to take a little bit of land in the far north and some in the far south border after sustaining mass casualties.
If Azeris had not sustained mass casualties and were progressing "on every front" like Aliyev claimed then they never would have agreed to a ceasefire after 1 week.