Thanks for not stating my whole post. I said previously, a group can be called terrorists (by the exact definition), when they target civilians for political,religious purposes. An attack can be called terrorism when it involves targeting civilians for the same reason. And I said in that post (which you didn't mention here, for obvious reasons), even if it involves an attack on Iranian military. I was solely talking about the abuse of the word terrorism by the west which has also affected people's mentality all over the world.
If a group attacks Iranian military (only and only military), I can call them animals, scumbags etc, but terrorist would not be the right word in this case. The last week attack in Ankara was purely a terrorist attack, because it killed civilians, but an IED attack against a Turkish or Iranian military convoy, would not be categorized as a terrorist attack.
ISIS are terrorists because they kill civilians for their beliefs and for the sake of terrorizing, not because of attacking SAA.