Abii
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,690
- Reaction score
- -13
- Country
- Location
Martike shetak to ke inja maghzet kar mikarde chi shode maghzet guzide??
Hefze aberoo yeki az mohem tarin chizast to farhange Irania. 1-2 sal pish fahmidam ke dorogh goftan vase hefze aberoo faghad baes mishe ke shoma arabaye haroom zade khoob jelve dade beshin. Alan say mikonam vagheiyato bezaram joloye hefze aberoo.
In regards to that specific post, I was willingly over looking a few things to achieve my goal (hefze aberoo). I knew full well that those numbers were meaningless for a few different reasons, but I was overlooking them. For example, research papers are meaningless when it's not for practical means (i.e. when there's practically zero funding to take that research off the drawing board and bring it to the development stage). Not only there's no funding, these papers are meant to lift Iran's possessions in different indices and not much more (essentially for show). If you look at the rankings in detail, you can see which countries make the most use out of their research by actually funding the projects and putting them to use. Also, if a paper is deemed interesting enough, other scientists end up citing the paper and referring to it for their own endeavors. Iran is at the bottom for both of these criteria. Not having your papers cited by academia practically means that the research was either useless or elementary (basic), designed for no purpose other than having a published paper.
Again, I was fully aware of all that, but "hefze aberoo" was still important to me. This nonsense didn't make Denmark and Canada the countries that they are today. Cold hard facts and rolling up your sleeves do more in the long-term than a thousand posts on a pakistani message board claiming that Iran is this and that. North Korea does the same, look at the shape it's in. South Korea deals with facts and rationality, look at the shape it's in.