What's new

Iran unveils Fateh-313 SRBM

Rohani on work. Aghareb,Fateh313,...
فاتح 110 رو از هوا فضای سپاه تحویل بگیری دقتش رو نابود کنی بعد به اسم پیشرفت سنسور و ... واسه مردم نمایش بدی
اون دودشم محض کمک به سیستمهای اپتیک دشمن هست!

خیلی تند میری برادر

رگ گردن تو از من که کلفت تر نیست

تمام حرف هایی که اینجا زده میشه حدس و گمان هست

آخه شما از پرتاب یه پروتوتایپ تشخیص دادی که موشک دان گرید شده !؟

می دونم انتظار یه ظاهر جدید داشتید

ولی یه نگاهی به سایوز روسها بندازید

بعد 60 سال هنوز به طراحی موشک دست نزدن

وقتی یه چیزی خوب کار می کنه مدرنیزه می کننش

تغییری توش نمی دن

این موشک خیلی هم خوبه ... بهتر هم خواهد شد
 
. .
خیلی تند میری برادر

رگ گردن تو از من که کلفت تر نیست

تمام حرف هایی که اینجا زده میشه حدس و گمان هست

آخه شما از پرتاب یه پروتوتایپ تشخیص دادی که موشک دان گرید شده !؟

می دونم انتظار یه ظاهر جدید داشتید

ولی یه نگاهی به سایوز روسها بندازید

بعد 60 سال هنوز به طراحی موشک دست نزدن

وقتی یه چیزی خوب کار می کنه مدرنیزه می کننش

تغییری توش نمی دن

این موشک خیلی هم خوبه ... بهتر هم خواهد شد

ما که بخیل نیستم.

ولی خداییش بعد از چندین ماه بی خبری , خبر دلچسبی نبود

In the case of Iran's military industry ,I hope it gets better
 
.
Rohani on work. Aghareb,Fateh313,...
فاتح 110 رو از هوا فضای سپاه تحویل بگیری دقتش رو نابود کنی بعد به اسم پیشرفت سنسور و ... واسه مردم نمایش بدی
اون دودشم محض کمک به سیستمهای اپتیک دشمن هست!
آخه من نمیدونم شما چرا همه چی را به روحانی و احمدینژاد نسبت میدی
فاتح 110 که مربوط به سال 2002 و دوران خاتمی است در ضمن طراحی اون هم مال Iran Aviation Industries Organization (IAIO) هستش
 
. . . .
@yavar This missile has the same range as Iskander. What are Iskander's advantages over this missile. I know it faster because it has a bigger rocket motor. In terms of accuracy they both have very high accuracy.
====>+1


yes same accuracy on both but
the new Iskandar has more advantages .the new Iskandar is ballistic but Fateh 313 is Quasi ballistic missiles .the new Iskandar has much much height maneuverability .
the new iskandar can defeat any and i mean any missile defence system in whole world . the new Iskandar got so many countermeasures that it make it impossible to be targeted
 
.
====>+1


yes same accuracy on both but
the new Iskandar has more advantages .the new Iskandar is ballistic but Fateh 313 is Quasi ballistic missiles .the new Iskandar has much much height maneuverability .
the new iskandar can defeat any and i mean any missile defence system in whole world . the new Iskandar got so many countermeasures that it make it impossible to be targeted


and new Iskandar is much more expensive ....
 
. .
500 km range and pinpoint accuracy , sounds like another short range missile destined for the american bases in iraq and afghanistan , fired from the border of course , too bad the americans are leaving

anyhow congratulations iran , we have finally acheived self sufficiency at the range of 500 km , the only place this could be really used with pinpoint accuracy is on the GCC arabs
 
.
I don't understand why these narrow body missiles are not canisterized and stacked to maximize carrying capacity. The same truck can easily carry 6 of these. Can you imagine the difference in fire power in real combat conditions?
 
.
I don't understand why these narrow body missiles are not canisterized and stacked to maximize carrying capacity. The same truck can easily carry 6 of these. Can you imagine the difference in fire power in real combat conditions?

Well, they have designed the Zolfiqar TEL which carries 2 Fateh family missile:

Fateh-110-new-TEL.jpg


I think 2 missile per truck is enough.
 
.
Well, they have designed the Zolfiqar TEL which carries 2 Fateh family missile:

Fateh-110-new-TEL.jpg


I think 2 missile per truck is enough.

Well 2 is better than one. But still 3 times less than 6.

And on what basis do you think 2 is enough? In case of a shooting war, we are likely to lose air superiority very quickly. So the lifespan of these TELs on the battlefield may not be very long. Therefore to maximize their punch and get the biggest bang for the investment, they need to be packed with as many rounds as possible.

And that's not to mention the added reliability and expanded shelf-life of canisterized systems.
 
.
Well 2 is better than one. But still 3 times less than 6.

And on what basis do you think 2 is enough? In case of a shooting war, we are likely to lose air superiority very quickly. So the lifespan of these TELs on the battlefield may not be very long. Therefore to maximize their punch and get the biggest bang for the investment, they need to be packed with as many rounds as possible.

And that's not to mention the added reliability and expanded shelf-life of canisterized systems.

Bro, these missiles are too big to have 6 per truck. You would need one giant truck for that. Maybe in the future they will increase the number to 3. But I rather have 2 missiles on 3 truck than 6 missiles on one truck. Higher survivability and also smaller truck means easier mobility.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom