Hack-Hook
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2012
- Messages
- 19,448
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
the reason has more to do with difference in design than the size , the size help but not as much as design and materialsBtw Size of UAV is not important. Size is determined by the power plant. And in case of flying wing and delta wing, the greater the size the more surface area to dissipate radar radiation. That is one reason why B-2 has a much lower radar signature than a mini RQ-170 or even Iranian suicide drone delta wing.
and about this
2020 plus project is astrike weapon the drone is a kamikaze drone , the 2030 project is also the same another kamikaze drone 2040+ project something they say the technology for it would be invented in 2040+ it mean in 2040+ it would be like f-22 was in 90s
By 2040 US airforce planes to have hypersonic stealth bombers by 2030 they plan to have black projects prototypes of deep strike platforms in place. I would say they already do have early prototypes from all the UFO sightings over Iranian nuclear sites in last 10 years.
so your suggestion is we stop and don't build a subsonic bomber UAV based on a flying wing in hope some day in 20-30 year the technology to build a delta wing hypersonic bomber will be invented
and this guy say i\m like an old woman who made baseless complains
maybe in 40 yearsMeanwhile a future US deep strike bomber can fly over Tehran from Bahrain in 6 mins.
thats why we say the money yo guys say we must spend on outdated russian design must be spend on domestic designsI am not against larger size UAV, but that would also require an even more powerful engine
by what i saw they attacked buildings , my guess some sort of storage, by the way what is your idea of russia use this long range drones to attack front line artillery instead of using shorter range one like Delta and Meeraj uavs and use this drone to attack supply lines from poland and Romania ?So what if target dispersed or moved to a shelter? or intelligence wasn't sustainable?