What's new

Iran to rev up oil exports to China

Now thats more like a sissy coward hiding behind 1962......wait how many yr back it was? ooooh ok it was 50 yrs back .... and din't your same brave army surrendered to vietnam woman army .....lolllllllllllllll

LOL, first you call us cowards, and then sissys, and then sissy cowards. :lol:

All to hide your humilation at being defeated so easily by these same sissy cowards, and living in eternal fear of these same sissys and cowards. :rofl:

'India can't match China's military force': Indian Naval Chief - IBN Live

India doesn't even have the balls to retaliate to the Mumbai attacks (despite all their boasting of "surgical strikes"). Then they cry about Chinese incursions all day as well, but at the end of the day, it is just whining and crying.
 
.
you know there is word for you if u like to hide behind human shield , its called "COWARD"

Coward- perceived failure to demonstrate sufficient mental robustness and courage in the face of a challenge.

Dude, if we can make you our human shield, which means we are more powerful than you. :pop:

Just check the history of US, how many human shields they have used so far to cover their own interests. :coffee:
 
.
China and India can take turns to take the lead role of Iranian oil importers. That way, both nations can face less pressure coming from the US. Finally, China and India can have some common ground.
 
.
LOL, yet you got smashed by this coward so easily in 1962. :azn:

Oh yeah, if a street dog musters the courage the to lick your boot and jeans ..... you'd say the street dog "smashed" you.
Even before you get ready to kick it away ... it runs off (still believing the bravado that it managed to lick).

Indeed .... so china believes that 1962 was the highest order of courage it could display.

Congratualtions on your "courage". :laugh:
And off course, don't try such "courage" again .... you may get kicked before you run away.


Anyway, hope your "generalessimo" Chiang Kai Shek had shown some (true) courage in Nanking ... when he simply withdrew his best troops from Nanking when Japan invaded .... leaving the city naked for plunder.
 
. . .
Are you one idiot or 3 idiots?

There are many more than 3 idiots here.

I came by to glean a rumour or two about the oil situation. There is no "gleaning" with this bunch of fools! I, too, am an idiot for expecting differently.

I don't know what's wrong with you, Tiger? You were "sensible" at times and I even learned a thing or two. Could've taken a chill pill, you know. What's this "human shield"? I tell you who got used as a human shield. When India announced to the world her nukes were "China-centric", that's called "human shielding".

What PRC did this time was "strategic cowardice". There is good "cowardice" and bad "cowardice". Qaddafi didn't appear to understand that. He wanted to look the "big man" at every turn but privately handed over the store. Discretion being the better part of valour - if being discrete means hiding behind someone's chakra tricoloured skirt, well pull up a chair behind the big mama, what's the shame? There ain't none. Look not long ago Bashar smugly mocked the Sunni leaders as "half men" ... look now how much fun he is having now defending "his manhood".

BTW, is this the first time the fat red kid hid behind the "sari"? I don't think so! 2008 Doha and 2009 Copenhagen came to mind ...
 
.
There are many more than 3 idiots here.

I came by to glean a rumour or two about the oil situation. There is no "gleaning" with this bunch of fools! I, too, am an idiot for expecting differently.

I don't know what's wrong with you, Tiger? You were "sensible" at times and I even learned a thing or two. Could've taken a chill pill, you know. What's this "human shield"? I tell you who got used as a human shield. When India announced to the world her nukes were "China-centric", that's called "human shielding".

What PRC did this time was "strategic cowardice". There is good "cowardice" and bad "cowardice". Qaddafi didn't appear to understand that. He wanted to look the "big man" at every turn but privately handed over the store. Discretion being the better part of valour - if being discrete means hiding behind someone's chakra tricoloured skirt, well pull up a chair behind the big mama, what's the shame? There ain't none. Look not long ago Bashar smugly mocked the Sunni leaders as "half men" ... look now how much fun he is having now defending "his manhood".

BTW, is this the first time the fat red kid hid behind the "sari"? I don't think so! 2008 Doha and 2009 Copenhagen came to mind ...

Hehe, this has nothing to do with India's nuke, imagine we have bought the Iranian oil first, the US would find a valid excuse to launch a political attack against us along with those Arab League nations.

We have dragged India along with us in this issue.
 
.
Oh yeah, if a street dog musters the courage the to lick your boot and jeans ..... you'd say the street dog "smashed" you.
Even before you get ready to kick it away ... it runs off (still believing the bravado that it managed to lick).

Indeed .... so china believes that 1962 was the highest order of courage it could display.

Congratualtions on your "courage". :laugh:
And off course, don't try such "courage" again .... you may get kicked before you run away.


Anyway, hope your "generalessimo" Chiang Kai Shek had shown some (true) courage in Nanking ... when he simply withdrew his best troops from Nanking when Japan invaded .... leaving the city naked for plunder.
LOL at indian inferiority complex...... if you were ready to take us on in 1962 when we unilaterally withdrew, why didn't you go back to your forward policy?? Why did the forward policy stop after we killed and captured your so-called "elite" indian army brigades?? Still hurting from the 1962 humiliation when China put india in its place?? :lol:
 
.
LOL....
India- China are now on same side of coin and Indian-chinese fanboys are still fighting with each other.
 
. .
LOL at indian inferiority complex...... if you were ready to take us on in 1962 when we unilaterally withdrew, why didn't you go back to your forward policy?? Why did the forward policy stop after we killed and captured your so-called "elite" indian army brigades?? Still hurting from the 1962 humiliation when China put india in its place?? :lol:

LOL at chinese Self-delusion..... if the chinese are so courageous, then why did Chiang Kai pull back his best troops from Nanking and left the poor city of Nanking for open plunder and rape. If you are so courageous, while china are being HUMILIATED .. all you set out was a LONG MARCH.
As for 1962 treachery ... if you really didn't run back, why are you still claiming Arunachal Pradesh? Shouldn't you already be in occupation of Arunachal, just like your occupation of Tibet and part of Ladakh (Aksai Chin). Even Aksai Chin was unmanned in 1959 when you thought that you could take Ladakh, just like you took Tibet.
Beware ... if you try to show your 1962 like "courage", you will sent on a LONG MARCH right up to Siberia and then into the Arctic Ocean. Understood, Mr. HongWu Shu Phu Teng. Shooo....
 
.
Exclusive: China, India plan Iran oil cuts of 10 percent or more

By Chen Aizhu and Nidhi Verma
BEIJING/NEW DELHI | Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:45am EST
(Reuters) - China, India and Japan are planning cuts of at least 10 percent in Iranian crude imports as tightening U.S. sanctions make it difficult for the top Asian buyers to keep doing business with the OPEC producer.

The countries together buy about 45 percent of Iran's crude exports. The reductions are the first significant evidence of how much crude business Iran could lose in Asia this year as Washington tries to tighten a financial noose around Tehran.

The cuts would add to a European Union ban on Iran oil imports, which comes into effect on July 1, to restrict the flow of vital foreign exchange to Tehran under pressure over its nuclear program.

Japan is close to an agreement with Washington on the size of cuts needed to win waivers from the U.S. sanctions, two ministers said. The Yomiuri newspaper, citing unidentified sources, said the two sides would settle on an 11 percent cut.

The Indian government is pushing its refineries to cut imports by at least 10 percent, two sources said. India has said it will not abide by U.S. unilateral sanctions, so its response could indicate the increasing uncertainty of doing business with Iran.

China's Unipec, the trading arms of Sinopec Corp, is likely to cut imports by 10 percent to 20 percent under 2012 supply contracts, a Chinese industry executive with direct knowledge of the deal said.

China had already cut back sharply on Iran crude purchases in the first quarter of 2012 while it haggled over full-year supplies contracts. Taking those cuts and planned purchases by China's only other major importer -- Zhuhai Zhenrong Corp -- into account, Reuters calculates China's total cuts this year will amount to about 14 percent.

In a further blow to Tehran, East Asian purchases of Iranian fuel oil is set to slump to a six-month low in March, according to comments from Singapore-based oil traders and an examination of shipping reports.

JAPAN DILEMMA

U.S. financial sanctions imposed since the beginning of this year are playing havoc with Iran's ability to buy imports and receive payment for its oil exports. Washington is pushing ahead with the sanctions because it fears Iran might use its nuclear program to develop nuclear weapons.

The European Union has imposed an oil imports embargo on Iran. In response, Tehran ordered a halt of oil sales to Britain and France.

Iran, the biggest producer in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries after Saudi Arabia, denies Western suspicions that its nuclear program has military goals, saying it is for purely peaceful purposes.

For Japan, avoiding U.S. sanctions is essential to protect its financial sector's operations abroad, but cutting oil imports could pose a risk to its struggling economy.

Japan's reliance on oil imports has grown since a 2011 earthquake and tsunami triggered the Fukushima radiation crisis, leading to the shut down of most nuclear power reactors.

"We are closely negotiating with the United States and are moving forward towards mutual understanding, but it is not the case that we have reached a conclusion," Trade Minister Yukio Edano told reporters. His comments were echoed by Foreign Minister Koichiro Gemba.

The United States says it will punish financial institutions that deal with Iran's central bank, the main clearing house for oil revenues, by shutting them out of U.S. markets. A country can earn a waiver from the sanctions if it significantly reduces trade with Iran.

"Many countries have approached us to discuss their efforts to reduce purchases of Iranian crude which, by statute, could except them from sanctions," a senior official in President Barack Obama's administration said.

"We are discussing specific cases with specific countries. It would be premature to discuss any of them at this time."

INDIA AND CHINA CUTS

India is Iran's second-biggest crude buyer after China. Iran provides about 12 percent of India's demand, or 370,000 barrels per day (bpd).

New Delhi indicated refineries should cut their imports from Iran by about 10-15 percent in the year through March 2013, one source said.

Another source said the cut should be "substantial."

The government had indicated it did not intend to seek a waiver from U.S. sanctions by cutting Iran crude imports and that it intended to keep trade flowing with Tehran.

It is planning to offset some Iranian imports against India's corresponding exports via a rupee payments system to keep trade moving.

Still, sanctions are cutting off payments routes. India's refiners have used Turkey's state-controlled Halkbank for payments to Iran in euros since the middle of 2011, but are unsure how long that route will last given tougher EU sanctions. Turkey is seeking membership of the EU.

China has also rejected U.S. sanctions as overstepping the mark but has already made substantial cuts in Iran crude imports as it negotiated with Tehran over terms and prices for 2012 deliveries.

The industry executive said Unipec would import as much as 20 percent less crude in 2012 compared with 2011, although he said most of those cuts had been achieved in the first quarter.

Reuters calculates first-quarter cuts by China averaged for the whole year would be around 71,000 bpd, a 14 percent reduction from 2011 contract imports of about 500,000 bpd.

Even though China is to cut 2012 imports, it increased Iranian purchases last year by 30 percent.

Zhuhai Zhenrong and a much smaller buyer of Iran crude, Chinaoil, are maintaining the level of their purchases in 2012 compared with 2011, so Unipec will absorb the cuts.

In January, Washington imposed sanctions on Zhenrong for its dealings with Iran in what analysts interpreted as largely symbolic because the Chinese company has limited U.S. business exposure.

However, they said it did send a signal to other Chinese companies that have invested heavily in the United States, including Unipec's parent Sinopec.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom