SOHEIL
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2011
- Messages
- 15,796
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
Lets see who gets the N.submarine first Pakistan or iran.
definitely pakistan ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lets see who gets the N.submarine first Pakistan or iran.
Pull your head out of your as$, and start reading more about this subject. No need to spread your ignorance here, Indian.
You did not answer my question. Again, was US's naval force in the Persian Gulf strongly superior to Iran's naval presence? Yes, or no?
If you would've read more about the subject, you would have known that:
Fact Sheet: Iran's Submarine Force | Institute for the Study of War
And this is an analysis conducted by the American Institute for the Study of War. Read it before you talk about a subject you know nothing about.
The new Kilos, to be based in southern Iran, are regarded by one U.S. intelligence official as so easy for U.S. aircraft to find and destroy that eliminating them would be little more than a "live fire exercise." Less capable submarines do not necessarily pose a serious danger even in large numbers. North Korea's fleet, for example, consists of antiquated Chinese-built Romeo-class vessels, a type the Soviet Union stopped selling in 1960. Libya's submarine crews have a reputation for being poorly trained, and their boats are so shoddily maintained that only one or two out of six may be operable--not one has routinely gone to sea since 1985.
Although diesel submarines have many advantages when deployed under appropriate conditions, they are not without weaknesses. Their engines make more noise than do nuclear reactors and cannot drive a submarine as fast. When running at high speed under electric power, a submarine can deplete its batteries in a few hours. Even at slower speeds it must still approach the surface to take in air every four to 10 days, depending on the submarine's capabilities and the captain's willingness to risk running out of power to avoid detection. Consequently, ASW forces can prevail by blanketing an area with vessels and aircraft. Admiral Henry Mauz, U.S. Atlantic commander in chief, explains, "If you don't let him snorkel, you hold him down. Pretty soon he can't work--it's too hot, too steamy, too much carbon dioxide and monoxide."
definitely pakistan ...
Lets see who gets the N.submarine first Pakistan or iran.
Subs are not detected by naked eyes but by sonars and magnetic anomalies.Size does not matter.
If you would've read more about the subject, you would have known that:
Fact Sheet: Iran's Submarine Force | Institute for the Study of War
And this is an analysis conducted by the American Institute for the Study of War. Read it before you talk about a subject you know nothing about.
This implies on Kilo class subs which is one of the quietest sub in the world but midget subs are noisy because Iran is not mature in reducing D.E. noise , engine noise , heat signature , prevention from metal detecting.
And please don't me like I am a troll.
Size does matter in the Persian Gulf, especially in the Straight of Hormuz. That is an ignorant statement.
even colour does matter ...
I haven't heard any new news regarding pakistan's N.submarine project. Why don't we get some help from france or ??
Iran has a good submarine force i must agree.3 kilos plus mini subs.Its a good bet against all regional navies and mini subs are perfect for shallow gulf waters.Particularly impressive is the Hoot supercavitating torpedo based on russian shkval.
It can easily blockade regional arab neighbours,but ofcourse shouldn't expect much against USN.To do damage against USN Iranian navie's best bet is supersonic ASHCM like sunburn or yakhont land based .
persiangulf anti ship ballistic missile:
Size does matter in the Persian Gulf, especially in the Straight of Hormuz. That is an ignorant statement.