What's new

Featured Iran sympathizes with Pakistan over terrorist attacks on troops

BS

Pakistan is all for implementing the UN resolution on Kashmir not tomorrow but today. Its India which is dragging its feet. This has been Pakistan position from day one. We want Kashmiris to get their democratic right asap, as confirmed by the international law through UN resolution.

Pakistan wants to resolve this dispute according to the UN resolutions while India is not interested in this hence India is an illegal occupier of the land hence any force used against it to evict it from Kashmir or force India to accept the plebiscite in Kashmir is fair.

Paksitan is not a occupier but safe keeper of the lands which were liberated from Indian clutches, Pakistan , on many occasions have already said that final resolution of Kashmir is with Kashmir vote. No ifs and buts.

You Indians have been debunked so many times about your "Pakistan didn't adhere to its part of UN resolution" non sense. Go and bloody read what it says. Its talks about all non resident and tribes who came to fight alongside Pak Army against Indian army. Those people have already long gone, infact right in the aftermath of the 1948 war. Truth of the matter is, we are at that stage of the resolutions where India needs to remove its forces from Indian occupied Kashmir.

Pakistan only makes a lot of noise ..that it wants implementation of UN resolution..had it wanted to know the wishes of Kashmiri people .. Pakistan would haven't invaded Kashmir in the first place..and instead accepted Mountbatens offer of UN organized plebscite in 1947 itself

Tribal laskhars might have gone from Kashmir ..but Pakistan army is not gone from Kashmir.

So when is Pakistan withdrawing its army from LoC ?

Btw do tell ..why did Pakistan remove state subject law from Kashmir and let outsiders settle In GB?
 
.
Are Baloch happy, is that why they kill Punjabis ?
Where on earth did you got that impression?

What's happening in Balochistan is a tribal warfare. Tribes who want more control and power want to fight govt forces and anyone else. Similar to what's happening in Afghanistan. And note that these Tribes are not present everywhere. Once you give them some legitimacy and start giving them money, they will all disappear. Look how long Bugti tribe ruled and got monetary benefits, once democracy came and he lost elections, he started war.

Balochistan is similar to Khalistan. Nothing like Indian Illegally occupied Jammu and Kashmir.
 
.
Pakistan only makes a lot of noise ..that it wants implementation of UN resolution..had it wanted to know the wishes of Kashmiri people .. Pakistan would haven't invaded Kashmir in the first place..and instead accepted Mountbatens offer of UN organized plebscite in 1947 itself

Tribal laskhars might have gone from Kashmir ..but Pakistan army is not gone from Kashmir.

So when is Pakistan withdrawing its army from LoC ?

Btw do tell ..why did Pakistan remove state subject law from Kashmir and let outsiders settle In GB?


Well if Pakistan is just making noise, why don't India call Pakistan bluff and agree on the plebiscite? Mountbatton is no UN. UN is an organization, not bound by one man, who btw was part of the problem with his siding with India and Nehru on boundary issues between Pakistan and India.

Pakistan again, through its NSA just last week called for plebiscite in Kashmir. Take on Pakistani offer, and call Pakistani bluff?


Again, read the UN resolution and while you do it, put your reading glasses on. There is only mention of non resident civilians and tribes, which are long gone. NO mention of Pakistan armed forces. As I said, we are at that stage where Indian army has to vacate Kashmir, according to the UN resolution.


ISLAMABAD - Federal Minister for Kashmir Affairs and Gilgit-Baltistan Mian Mazoor Ahmed Wattoo on Monday told the lower house of the Parliament that Kashmir was a disputed territory, so no Pakistani can buy land in the region whereas Kashmiris can buy land in Pakistan and even can contest elections
 
.
Well if Pakistan is just making noise, why don't India call Pakistan bluff and agree on the plebiscite? Mountbatton is no UN. UN is an organization, not bound by one man, who btw was part of the problem with his siding with India and Nehru on boundary issues between Pakistan and India.

Pakistan again, through its NSA just last week called for plebiscite in Kashmir. Take on Pakistani offer, and call Pakistani bluff?


Again, read the UN resolution and while you do it, put your reading glasses on. There is only mention of non resident civilians and tribes, which are long gone. NO mention of Pakistan armed forces. As I said, we are at that stage where Indian army has to vacate Kashmir, according to the UN resolution.


ISLAMABAD - Federal Minister for Kashmir Affairs and Gilgit-Baltistan Mian Mazoor Ahmed Wattoo on Monday told the lower house of the Parliament that Kashmir was a disputed territory, so no Pakistani can buy land in the region whereas Kashmiris can buy land in Pakistan and even can contest elections

Mountbatten offered UN mandated plebiscite, but Jinnah refused and proceeded with invasion independent state of Kashmir. Because up till then Pakistan was confident it could capture Kashmir by force..so it did not need see a need to ask the wishes of Kashmiri people.

It is only when Pakistan was defeated and had lost 3/5th Kashmir to India, did Pakistan agree to a ceasefire.

UN resolution states

  • In the first step, Pakistan was asked to use its "best endeavors" to secure the withdrawal of all tribesmen and Pakistani nationals, putting an end to the fighting in the state.


    Pakistani army are Pakistani nationals ..so let us know when Pakistan army is withdrawing from Kashmir ?
 
.
Economically and culturally the Balochis would be better off as an independent country. Pakistan does nothing for them other than to suppress them and bring them down. Look how well off Bangladesh is without Pakistan.

Sindhis would also be MUCH better off on their own.
 
.
@Aspen

1603143984700.png


What's the soft warning about?? For posting a thread!? :confused:
 
.
Mountbatten offered UN mandated plebiscite, but Jinnah refused and proceeded with invasion independent state of Kashmir. Because up till then Pakistan was confident it could capture Kashmir by force..so it did not need see a need to ask the wishes of Kashmiri people.

It is only when Pakistan was defeated and had lost 3/5th Kashmir to India, did Pakistan agree to a ceasefire.

UN resolution states

  • In the first step, Pakistan was asked to use its "best endeavors" to secure the withdrawal of all tribesmen and Pakistani nationals, putting an end to the fighting in the state.


    Pakistani army are Pakistani nationals ..so let us know when Pakistan army is withdrawing from Kashmir ?


Mountbatten offered UN plebiscite? You getting your chain of events all wrong. Kashmir issue went into the UN as the aftermath of the 1948 war, when India went running to UN with its tail firmly between its legs asking for intervention. And after that both Pakistan and India agreed on UN sponsored plebiscite on the UN platform.


YOU NEED TO BLOODY WRITE THE WHOLE TEXT, NOT SELECTIVE. And here is what UN resolution says:

a) To secure the the withdrawl from the state of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani nationals who are not normally resident therein and who have entered the state for the purpose of fighting, and to prevent any intrusion to the state of such elements and any furnishing of material aid to those fighting in the state.


This "specifically" referring to the Pakistani citizens and tribesmen, ordinary "non military" everyday men, who went inside Kashmir to fight along side Pakistan army against Indian forces. This is further emphasised but underlining that these individuals shouldnt be allowed back into Kashmir, which can only be done by Pakistani law enforcement organ of state, like Pakistani military. This particular clause of the UN resolution is under the portion which say what Pakistan should do. So there should be no doubt in anyone mind that this only concerns the ordinary non military civilians of Pakistan, NOT THE PAKISTAN MILITARY. Savy?


While Pakistani army is not mentioned at all in the UN resolution, Indian forces by name is mentioned. And now when are at the stage when Indian army must vacate Kashmir.

MORE IMPORTANTLY, under the section of what Indian should do,

a) When it is established to the satisfaction of the commission setup in accordance with the Council resolution 39 (1948) that the tribesmen are withdrawing and that the arrangement for the cessation of the fighting have become effective, put into operation in consultation with the commission a plan for withdrawing their forces from Jammu and Kashmir......


AGAIN, only tribesmen are mentioned even in the part of what India should do.

Tribesmen are gone, so the question is:

NOW WHEN ARE YOU REMOVING YOUR FILTH FROM KASHMIR?
 
.
words means nothing when BLA leadership enjoys their lives in Iran , no action has been taken against them so these are only empty words for us, Uzair Baloch , Kulbhoshan Yadev and BLA all of them has one thing in common IRAN ..
 
.
Mountbatten offered UN plebiscite? You getting your chain of events all wrong. Kashmir issue went into the UN as the aftermath of the 1948 war, when India went running to UN with its tail firmly between its legs asking for intervention. And after that both Pakistan and India agreed on UN sponsored plebiscite on the UN platform.


YOU NEED TO BLOODY WRITE THE WHOLE TEXT, NOT SELECTIVE. And here is what UN resolution says:

a) To secure the the withdrawl from the state of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani nationals who are not normally resident therein and who have entered the state for the purpose of fighting, and to prevent any intrusion to the state of such elements and any furnishing of material aid to those fighting in the state.


This "specifically" referring to the Pakistani citizens and tribesmen, ordinary "non military" everyday men, who went inside Kashmir to fight along side Pakistan army against Indian forces. This is further emphasised but underlining that these individuals shouldnt be allowed back into Kashmir, which can only be done by Pakistani law enforcement organ of state, like Pakistani military. This particular clause of the UN resolution is under the portion which say what Pakistan should do. So there should be no doubt in anyone mind that this only concerns the ordinary non military civilians of Pakistan, NOT THE PAKISTAN MILITARY. Savy?


While Pakistani army is not mentioned at all in the UN resolution, Indian forces by name is mentioned. And now when are at the stage when Indian army must vacate Kashmir.

MORE IMPORTANTLY, under the section of what Indian should do,

a) When it is established to the satisfaction of the commission setup in accordance with the Council resolution 39 (1948) that the tribesmen are withdrawing and that the arrangement for the cessation of the fighting have become effective, put into operation in consultation with the commission a plan for withdrawing their forces from Jammu and Kashmir......


AGAIN, only tribesmen are mentioned even in the part of what India should do.

Tribesmen are gone, so the question is:

NOW WHEN ARE YOU REMOVING YOUR FILTH FROM KASHMIR?

1.Stop spewing BS here..I know exactly what USNC res says. In first step all Pakistani nationals - ( army , non army etc) have to leave Kashmir. Let us know, when you have done that, we will initiate step 2.

A. Restoration of peace and order - Step 1

1. The Government of Pakistan should undertake to use its best endeavours:

(a) To secure the withdrawal from the State of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani nationals not normally resident therein who have entered the State for the purpose of fighting, and to prevent any intrusion into the State of such elements and any furnishing of material aid to those fighting in the State;

(b) To make known to all concerned that the measures indicated in this and the following paragraphs provide
full freedom to all subjects of the State, regardless of creed, caste, or party, to express their
views and to vote on the question of the accession of the State, and that therefore they should co-operate
in the maintenance of peace and order.

2. The Government of India should: - Step 2
(a) When it is established to the satisfaction of the Commission set up in accordance with the Council's
resolution 39 (1948) that the tribesmen are withdrawing and that arrangements for the cessation of the
fighting have become effective, put into operation in consultation with the Commission a plan for withdrawing
their own forces from Jammu and Kashmir and reducing them progressively to the minimum strength required for
the support of the civil power in the maintenance of law and order;
(b) Make known that the withdrawal is taking place in stages and announce the completion of each stage;
(c) When the Indian forces have been reduced to the minimum strength mentioned in (a) above, arrange in
consultation with the Commission for the stationing of the remaining forces to be carried out in accordance
with the following principles:
(i) That the presence of troops should not afford any intimidation or appearance of intimidation to the
inhabitants of the State;
(ii) That as small a number as possible should be retained in forward areas;
(iii) That any reserve of troops which may be included in the total strength should be located within their
present base area.
3. The Government of India should agree that until such time as the Plebiscite Administration referred to
below finds it necessary to exercise the powers of direction and supervision over the State forces and police
provided for in paragraph 8, they will be held in areas to be agreed upon with the Plebiscite Administrator.
4. After the plan referred to in paragraph 2 (a) above has been put into operation, personnel recruited locally
in each district should so far as possible be utilized for the re-establishment and maintenance of law and
order with due regard to protection of minorities, subject to such additional requirements as may be specified
by the Plebiscite Administration referred to in paragraph 7.
5. If these local forces should be found to be inadequate, the Commission, subject to the agreement of both
the Government of India and the Government of Pakistan, should arrange for the use of such forces of either
Dominion as it deems effective for the purpose of pacification.
B. Plebiscite
6. The Government of India should undertake to ensure that the Government of the State invite the major
political groups to designate responsible representatives to share equitably and fully in the conduct of the
administration at the ministerial level while the plebiscite is being prepared and carried out.
7. The Government of India should undertake that there will be established in Jammu and Kashmir a Plebiscite
Administration to hold a plebiscite as soon as possible on the question of the accession of the State to India
or Pakistan.
8. The Government of India should undertake that there will be delegated by the State to the Plebiscite
Administration such powers as the latter considers necessary for holding a fair and impartial plebiscite
including, for that purpose only, the direction and supervision of the State forces and police.
9. The Government of India should, at the request of the Plebiscite Administration, make available from the
Indian forces such assistance as the Plebiscite Administration may require for the performance of its functions.
10. (a) The Government of India should agree that a nominee of the Secretary-General of the United Nations will
be appointed to be the Plebiscite Administrator.
(b) The Plebiscite Administrator, acting as an officer of the State of Jammu and Kashmir, should have
authority to nominate his assistants and other subordinates and to draft regulations governing the plebiscite.
Such nominees should be formally appointed and such draft regulations should be formally promulgated by the
State of Jammu and Kashmir.
(c) The Government of India should undertake that the Government of Jammu and Kashmir will appoint fully
qualified persons nominated by the Plebiscite Administrator to act as special magistrates within the State
judicial system to hear cases which in the opinion of the Plebiscite Administrator have a serious bearing on
the preparation for and the conduct of a free and impartial plebiscite.
(d) The terms of service of the Administrator should form the subject of a separate negotiation between the
Secretary-General of the United Nations and the Government of India. The Administrator should fix the terms
of service for his assistants and subordinates.
(e) The Administrator should have the right to communicate directly with the Government of the State and with
the Commission of the Security Council and, through the Commission, with the Security Council, with the
Governments of India and Pakistan and with their representatives with the Commission. It would be his duty
to bring to the notice of any or
all of the foregoing (as he in his discretion may decide) any circumstances arising which may tend, in his
opinion, to interfere with the freedom of the plebiscite.
11. The Government of India should undertake to prevent, and to give full support to the Administrator and
his staff in preventing, any threat, coercion or intimidation, bribery or other undue influence on the voters
in the plebiscite, and the Government of India should publicly announce and should cause the Government of
the State to announce this undertaking as an international obligation binding on all public authorities and
officials in Jammu and Kashmir.
12. The Government of India should themselves and through the Government of the State declare and make known
that all subjects of the State of Jammu and Kashmir, regardless of creed, caste or party, will be safe and
free in expressing their views and in voting on the question of the accession of the State and that there
will be freedom of the press, speech and assembly and freedom of travel in the State, including freedom of
lawful entry and exit.
13. The Government of India should use and should ensure that the Government of the State also use their
best endeavours to effect the withdrawal from the State of all Indian nationals other than those who are
normally resident therein or who on or since 15 August 1947 have entered it for a lawful purpose.
14. The Government of India should ensure that the Government of the State releases all political prisoners
and take all possible steps so that:
(a) All citizens of the State who have left it on account of disturbances are invited, and are free, to
return to their homes and to exercise their rights as such citizens;
(b) There is no victimization;
(c) Minorities in all parts of the State are accorded adequate protection.
15. The Commission of the Security Council should at the end of the plebiscite certify to the Council whether
the plebiscite has or has not been really free and impartial.
C. General provisions
16. The Governments of India and Pakistan should each be invited to nominate a representative to be attached
to the Commission for such assistance as it may require in the performance of its task.
17. The Commission should establish in Jammu and Kashmir such observers as it may require of any of the
proceedings in pursuance of the measures indicated in the foregoing paragraphs.
18. The Security Council Commission should carry out the tasks assigned to it herein.


2. Stop making a fool of yourself and go read about Jinnah - Mountbatten talks which were held in Lahore in November 1947.
 
Last edited:
.
1.Stop spewing BS here..I know exactly what USNC res says. In first step all Pakistani nationals - ( army , non army etc) have to leave Kashmir. Let us know, when you have done that, we will initiate step 2.

A. Restoration of peace and order - Step 1

1. The Government of Pakistan should undertake to use its best endeavours:

(a) To secure the withdrawal from the State of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani nationals not normally resident therein who have entered the State for the purpose of fighting, and to prevent any intrusion into the State of such elements and any furnishing of material aid to those fighting in the State;

(b) To make known to all concerned that the measures indicated in this and the following paragraphs provide
full freedom to all subjects of the State, regardless of creed, caste, or party, to express their
views and to vote on the question of the accession of the State, and that therefore they should co-operate
in the maintenance of peace and order.

2. The Government of India should: - Step 2
(a) When it is established to the satisfaction of the Commission set up in accordance with the Council's
resolution 39 (1948) that the tribesmen are withdrawing and that arrangements for the cessation of the
fighting have become effective, put into operation in consultation with the Commission a plan for withdrawing
their own forces from Jammu and Kashmir and reducing them progressively to the minimum strength required for
the support of the civil power in the maintenance of law and order;
(b) Make known that the withdrawal is taking place in stages and announce the completion of each stage;
(c) When the Indian forces have been reduced to the minimum strength mentioned in (a) above, arrange in
consultation with the Commission for the stationing of the remaining forces to be carried out in accordance
with the following principles:
(i) That the presence of troops should not afford any intimidation or appearance of intimidation to the
inhabitants of the State;
(ii) That as small a number as possible should be retained in forward areas;
(iii) That any reserve of troops which may be included in the total strength should be located within their
present base area.
3. The Government of India should agree that until such time as the Plebiscite Administration referred to
below finds it necessary to exercise the powers of direction and supervision over the State forces and police
provided for in paragraph 8, they will be held in areas to be agreed upon with the Plebiscite Administrator.
4. After the plan referred to in paragraph 2 (a) above has been put into operation, personnel recruited locally
in each district should so far as possible be utilized for the re-establishment and maintenance of law and
order with due regard to protection of minorities, subject to such additional requirements as may be specified
by the Plebiscite Administration referred to in paragraph 7.
5. If these local forces should be found to be inadequate, the Commission, subject to the agreement of both
the Government of India and the Government of Pakistan, should arrange for the use of such forces of either
Dominion as it deems effective for the purpose of pacification.
B. Plebiscite
6. The Government of India should undertake to ensure that the Government of the State invite the major
political groups to designate responsible representatives to share equitably and fully in the conduct of the
administration at the ministerial level while the plebiscite is being prepared and carried out.
7. The Government of India should undertake that there will be established in Jammu and Kashmir a Plebiscite
Administration to hold a plebiscite as soon as possible on the question of the accession of the State to India
or Pakistan.
8. The Government of India should undertake that there will be delegated by the State to the Plebiscite
Administration such powers as the latter considers necessary for holding a fair and impartial plebiscite
including, for that purpose only, the direction and supervision of the State forces and police.
9. The Government of India should, at the request of the Plebiscite Administration, make available from the
Indian forces such assistance as the Plebiscite Administration may require for the performance of its functions.
10. (a) The Government of India should agree that a nominee of the Secretary-General of the United Nations will
be appointed to be the Plebiscite Administrator.
(b) The Plebiscite Administrator, acting as an officer of the State of Jammu and Kashmir, should have
authority to nominate his assistants and other subordinates and to draft regulations governing the plebiscite.
Such nominees should be formally appointed and such draft regulations should be formally promulgated by the
State of Jammu and Kashmir.
(c) The Government of India should undertake that the Government of Jammu and Kashmir will appoint fully
qualified persons nominated by the Plebiscite Administrator to act as special magistrates within the State
judicial system to hear cases which in the opinion of the Plebiscite Administrator have a serious bearing on
the preparation for and the conduct of a free and impartial plebiscite.
(d) The terms of service of the Administrator should form the subject of a separate negotiation between the
Secretary-General of the United Nations and the Government of India. The Administrator should fix the terms
of service for his assistants and subordinates.
(e) The Administrator should have the right to communicate directly with the Government of the State and with
the Commission of the Security Council and, through the Commission, with the Security Council, with the
Governments of India and Pakistan and with their representatives with the Commission. It would be his duty
to bring to the notice of any or
all of the foregoing (as he in his discretion may decide) any circumstances arising which may tend, in his
opinion, to interfere with the freedom of the plebiscite.
11. The Government of India should undertake to prevent, and to give full support to the Administrator and
his staff in preventing, any threat, coercion or intimidation, bribery or other undue influence on the voters
in the plebiscite, and the Government of India should publicly announce and should cause the Government of
the State to announce this undertaking as an international obligation binding on all public authorities and
officials in Jammu and Kashmir.
12. The Government of India should themselves and through the Government of the State declare and make known
that all subjects of the State of Jammu and Kashmir, regardless of creed, caste or party, will be safe and
free in expressing their views and in voting on the question of the accession of the State and that there
will be freedom of the press, speech and assembly and freedom of travel in the State, including freedom of
lawful entry and exit.
13. The Government of India should use and should ensure that the Government of the State also use their
best endeavours to effect the withdrawal from the State of all Indian nationals other than those who are
normally resident therein or who on or since 15 August 1947 have entered it for a lawful purpose.
14. The Government of India should ensure that the Government of the State releases all political prisoners
and take all possible steps so that:
(a) All citizens of the State who have left it on account of disturbances are invited, and are free, to
return to their homes and to exercise their rights as such citizens;
(b) There is no victimization;
(c) Minorities in all parts of the State are accorded adequate protection.
15. The Commission of the Security Council should at the end of the plebiscite certify to the Council whether
the plebiscite has or has not been really free and impartial.
C. General provisions
16. The Governments of India and Pakistan should each be invited to nominate a representative to be attached
to the Commission for such assistance as it may require in the performance of its task.
17. The Commission should establish in Jammu and Kashmir such observers as it may require of any of the
proceedings in pursuance of the measures indicated in the foregoing paragraphs.
18. The Security Council Commission should carry out the tasks assigned to it herein.


2. Stop making a fool of yourself and go read about Jinnah - Mountbatten talks which were held in Lahore in November 1947.


Fking Indian rat, GO AND BLOODY READ THE DAMN TEXT.



I have already explained that it never mentioned about Pakistan Army. It exlusively talking about the non military , ordinary Pakistani nationals and tribesmen who fought shoulder to shoulder with Pakistan army .



a) To secure the withdrawl from the state of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani nationals who are not normally resident therein and who have entered the state for the purpose of fighting,


and to prevent any intrusion to the state

of such elements and any furnishing of material aid to those fighting in the state.



This is further emphasised but underlining that these individuals shouldnt be allowed back into Kashmir, which can

only be done by Pakistani law enforcement organ of state, like Pakistani military




MORE IMPORTANTLY,

under the section of what Indian should do

a)

When it is established to the satisfaction of the commission setup in accordance with the Council resolution 39 (1948) that the tribesmen are withdrawing and that the arrangement for the cessation of the fighting have become effective, put into operation in consultation with the commission a plan for withdrawing their forces from Jammu and Kashmir......



AGAIN,


only tribesmen are mentioned even in the part of what India should do, BOTH PARTS ABOUT PAKISTAN AND INDIA ARE RELATED.





Now don't act as a smart arse rat, explain these finer details among your kind so you don't make fool out of yourself and spare your countrymen the embarrassment of not know what is written in UN resolution.
 
.
Fking Indian rat, GO AND BLOODY READ THE DAMN TEXT.



I have already explained that it never mentioned about Pakistan Army. It exlusively talking about the non military , ordinary Pakistani nationals and tribesmen who fought shoulder to shoulder with Pakistan army .



a) To secure the the
withdrawl from the state of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani nationals who are not normally resident therein and who have entered the state for the purpose of fighting,


and to prevent any intrusion to the state

of such elements and any furnishing of material aid to those fighting in the state.



This is further emphasised but underlining that these individuals shouldnt be allowed back into Kashmir, which can

only be done by Pakistani law enforcement organ of state, like Pakistani military




MORE IMPORTANTLY,

under the section of what Indian should do

,

a)


When it is established to the satisfaction of the commission setup in accordance with the Council resolution 39 (1948) that the tribesmen are withdrawing and that the arrangement for the cessation of the fighting have become effective, put into operation in consultation with the commission a plan for withdrawing their forces from Jammu and Kashmir......



AGAIN,


only tribesmen are mentioned even in the part of what India should do, BOTH PARTS ABOUT PAKISTAN AND INDIA ARE RELATED.





Now don't act as a smart arse rat, explain these finer details among your kind so you don't make fool out of yourself and spare your countrymen the embarrassment of not know what is written in UN resolution.
Don't try to Bull $hit...and impose your own interpretation of UN resolution .

I have posted the entire US res 47 in my post.

The first line itself states that all Pakistani Nationals , who are not residents of J&K ...who have come to Kashmir for the purpose of fighting or stopping Indian intrusion... have to leave Kashmir.

If your army which is deployed in Kashmir are Pakistani Nationals and are not residents of J&k ..then they have to leave Kashmir.

Otherwise you can forget about UN resolutions...and plebscite.
 
Last edited:
.
Don't try to Bull $hit...and impose your own interpretation of UN resolution .

I have posted the entire US res 47 in my post.

The first line itself states that all Pakistani Nationals , who are not residents of J&K ...who have come to Kashmir for the purpose of fighting or stopping Indian intrusion... have to leave Kashmir.

If your army which is deployed in Kashmir are Pakistani Nationals and are not residents of J&k ..then they have to leave Kashmir.

Otherwise you can forget about UN resolutions...and plebscite.


Piss off you little pieace of shite Indian. Everyone knows the UN resolution only talks about ordinary Pakistani nationals (civilians) and tribesmen who fought shoulder to shoulder with Pakistan army against India. The fact further underlined in the section of what India must do, which again mention about only Pakistani tribes and their withdrawal, NOT Pakistan army.


Now fk off and teach your own kind about what UN resolution is all about, and get out of Kashmir pronto.
 
.
Piss off you little pieace of shite Indian. Everyone knows the UN resolution only talks about ordinary Pakistani nationals (civilians) and tribesmen who fought shoulder to shoulder with Pakistan army against India. The fact further underlined in the section of what India must do, which again mention about only Pakistani tribes and their withdrawal, NOT Pakistan army.


Now fk off and teach your own kind about what UN resolution is all about, and get out of Kashmir pronto.

Kid..not only are ignorant but also are extremely stupid ..that you are not able to read .. what is right in front of you in black and white

UN resolution 47 says ..that all Pakistani Nationals have to leave Kashmir.. regardless of their occupation.

Go ask your seniors..they will tell you the same.

So you can forget about any plebescite.
 
.
Kid..not only are ignorant but also are extremely stupid ..that you are not able to read .. what is right in front of you in black and white

UN resolution 47 says ..that all Pakistani Nationals have to leave Kashmir.. regardless of their occupation.

Go ask your seniors..they will tell you the same.

So you can forget about any plebescite.

Peace of shite, go and READ the UN resolution AGAIN. What does it say even in Indian section? Clearly referring to the TRIBEMEN only. Both these sections needs to be read together to have the correct understanding of the text, but hey, you Indians are known to be highly ignorant and delusional shitholes anyway.
 
.
The French Iranian nexus in Balochistan will not be allowed to gain further leverage.

The Iranian authorities are gloves in hands with destabilising Balochistan.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom