What's new

Iran Successfully Test Launches New Ballistic Missile That Can Reach Israel

That's because Pakistan does not provide the true specs about range and warhead size. Acc. to one scientist working at these institutions for some missile the understatement is of about 1500-2000 kms.
Now that's interesting way of putting it down so let ask you a question why the range of Iranian missile since 15 years ago remained the same magical 2000 km ,please don't tell me because Iran provide the exact spec for its missile .
a question range and weight of warhead aside . why you think Ghauri is in the same class as khorramshahr ? Just because they both use liquid fuel ?
 
.
Now that's interesting way of putting it down so let ask you a question why the range of Iranian missile since 15 years ago remained the same magical 2000 km ,please don't tell me because Iran provide the exact spec for its missile .
a question range and weight of warhead aside . why you think Ghauri is in the same class as khorramshahr ? Just because they both use liquid fuel ?
The logical explanation is that Iran states the goal (2000 km) as the range of its missiles. And it is good to work towards a goal.
 
.
NK provided you only the liquid fuel or may be Pakistan also provided you our old technology of Ghauri-I

Why do you need to bring sectarian angle on every technical discussion :hitwall::hitwall:
Reported.

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/R43480.pdf


Will it be tested?

Ha Ha Ha ... You can believe what ever you want but try to keep the BS inside !

Every other day Iranian announce new invention Kindly invent balls to test u r nuclear warhead like Pakistan did.


for your info I am from Syed Shia family.

Never said we have nukes !!!

What are you talking about ?
 
.
Ha Ha Ha ... You can believe what ever you want but try to keep the BS inside !
Hey we are positive people and want to you. We tried to help you with nukes too but you couldn't contain it.
 
.
The logical explanation is that Iran states the goal (2000 km) as the range of its missiles. And it is good to work towards a goal.

Goal ... LOL

Hey we are positive people and want to you. We tried to help you with nukes too but you couldn't contain it.

In fact we want to play it the other way ... Only smart people can understand !
 
. .
The issue with this missile is that the Nuclear deal is for only ten years and after 10 years Iran can produce nukes and this missile can carry the load of large nuke and according to israeli assessment the North Korean nuclear program is running with collaboration with Iran. This missile can throw a nuke on Israel. Regarding liquid fuel missile is that they are slower than solid but they are more maneuverable than solid fuel.
 
. .
The logical explanation is that Iran states the goal (2000 km) as the range of its missiles. And it is good to work towards a goal.
And so that's the logical explanation about the spec of Pakistan missile . by the way you fire one ballistic missile and from the trajectory data of that test any physician who worth its name can tell you the maximum range of the missiles so there is no point hiding it.
We deliberately change the warhead weight to keep the range in 2000km limit for political reasons .
 
. .
And so that's the logical explanation about the spec of Pakistan missile . by the way you fire one ballistic missile and from the trajectory data of that test any physician who worth its name can tell you the maximum range of the missiles so there is no point hiding it.
We deliberately change the warhead weight to keep the range in 2000km limit for political reasons .
And your comment is not applicable to Iran's missile because they follow some other set of physical laws?
 
.
And your comment is not applicable to Iran's missile because they follow some other set of physical laws?
Well you start that route so you accept Pakistan also has a goal to reach that distance they claim or you accept your logical guess was way off.

The issue with this missile is that the Nuclear deal is for only ten years and after 10 years Iran can produce nukes and this missile can carry the load of large nuke and according to israeli assessment the North Korean nuclear program is running with collaboration with Iran. This missile can throw a nuke on Israel. Regarding liquid fuel missile is that they are slower than solid but they are more maneuverable than solid fuel.
Wrong you see the nuclear deal is not for 10 years if you read it you see that it has no limit . and won't forget since 1985 Iran is just months away from building the bomb.
 
.
Well you start that route so you accept Pakistan also has a goal to reach that distance they claim or you accept your logical guess was way off.
Well, Pakistan has never set a magic number as you claimed "2000 km" in Iran's case. Pakistan has already tested missiles with 2750 km (official) range and an MIRV with 2200 km official range and experts believe that Shaheen-III actual range is more than 3600 km and initially so reports have claimed that but govt decided it declare a 2750 km range missile that is the farthest point of Indian land (Islands of Andaman). If you read any news report by US and other think tanks and research groups, mostly they give a higher number where its ranges or no. of nukes but it is govt of Pakistan that downplays. And that has to do with different political posturing and situation of Pakistan and Iran. Pakistan is very much connected and does not want to upset the world while Iran on the other hand has been isolated and sanctioned so it acts unintimated on diplomatic and political level.
 
.
Well, Pakistan has never set a magic number as you claimed "2000 km" in Iran's case. Pakistan has already tested missiles with 2750 km (official) range and an MIRV with 2200 km official range and experts believe that Shaheen-III actual range is more than 3600 km and initially so reports have claimed that but govt decided it declare a 2750 km range missile that is the farthest point of Indian land (Islands of Andaman). If you read any news report by US and other think tanks and research groups, mostly they give a higher number where its ranges or no. of nukes but it is govt of Pakistan that downplays. And that has to do with different political posturing and situation of Pakistan and Iran. Pakistan is very much connected and does not want to upset the world while Iran on the other hand has been isolated and sanctioned so it acts unintimated on diplomatic and political level.
Well you see American believe khorramshahr is a 4000km missile not 2000km one. But that aside we already test a 2500km-3000km missile but never talked about it later .
https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iran/ashura.htm

And honestly shahab 3 is in development and yet to be deployed.

Also soomar has a 2500km of range.
 
.
Well you see American believe khorramshahr is a 4000km missile not 2000km one. But that aside we already test a 2500km-3000km missile but never talked about it later .
https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iran/ashura.htm

And honestly shahab 3 is in development and yet to be deployed.
So that's really good. But now also start looking into the solid fuel technology and you better know from where to get it. It has some advantages over the liquid fuel for example quick response time. I want to see a stronger Iran.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom