You have not once answered anyone on this thread who is demeaning Pakistan,
To begin with, I didn't fully read those posts, brother. Then, to be honest you and your friend "Falcon29" didn't allow me to, by forcing me to address your comments (which, in "Falcon29's" case, included some offensive and insulting content too, which moderators needed to delete), and that is time-consuming enough.
Plus, in case you didn't notice, in another recent thread I let Surenas know that I fully agreed with his assessment of Iranian policy, but that this does not extend to his comments on Pakistan.
You keep spouting iranian narrative with every post.
That, my dear brother, is untrue. I keep making properly researched, well documented posts complete with hard proof which you seem unable to refute and simply choose to ignore. None of what I wrote is lifted from Iranian official statements.
I am not interested in Iranian propaganda, I know what they say. I am interested in facts.
So are you really denying all the proof I presented you with concerning Iran's well documented, undeniable and massive support for our dearest Sunni Muslim brothers and sisters of Bosnia and Herzegovina during the 1990's civil war? Is this for real?
Let me remind you that following types of sources have documented this reality:
- Iranian sources, along with
photographic and video proof.
-
Bosno-Serbian and Bosno-Croatian sources critical towards Iran.
- American sources, including
CIA agent Robert Baer and
Congress hearings.
-
UN records.
- Renowned
academic scholars from various backgrounds.
- Recognized publications like
Janes Defence Weekly.
When this is so amply documented and cross-verified by sources from
opposing camps and sides, when you have numerous clear-cut photographs and video recordings documenting it beyond the shadow of a doubt, then it is the naked truth my brother, no more and no less.
I always wondered, where did you even get the bizarre notion from, that Iran sided with the Serbs of Bosnia? Frankly brother, that's a blatant lie and such a ludicrous one that I wouldn't repeat it in front of a minimally informed audience. You haven't provided a iota of evidence to substantiate the claim. Actually I never came accross anyone in my entire life making this strange accusation, other than you.
I will have to conclude that in the present case, you have sadly chosen to resist obvious truth and proven facts presented to you, my brother. This is verging on intellectually dishonesty. Therefore I will humbly urge you not to engage in accusations against your Muslim brothers that were proven wrong, for resorting to libellous accusations is not really a correct thing to do from the point of view of Islamic teachings.
The entire Muslim world sees Iranian backing of Armenia is backstabbing of the Muslim cause, but then again, this is a recurrent theme with Iran.
Surely this "entire Muslim world" you're referring to, must have seen ample hard proof for this, the kind of which I posted concerning Islamic Iran's historically established and undeniable backing of our beloved Sunni Muslims of Bosna and Herzegovina?
If so, what are you waiting for to show us readers precisely that proof, my friend? Simply levelling an accusation against someone will not make it true I'm afraid.
Actually, much of the Muslim world is pretty aware of the sacrifices Islamic Iran has consented in order to support multiple Islamic causes accross the world since the 1979 Revolution, including
the most important one, that is the Palestinian cause, where Iran is
the only state actor to muster enough courage to extend
military assistance to the Palestine Resistance (again consisting essentially of Sunni Muslims) and to stand up in such a manner to international zionism i. e. to the most potent, influential and powerful entity/group on Earth.
Aim your outrage elsewhere, he is talking about Persian racial nationalists
If that were the case, brother, he would surely have made it clear in his comment, don't you think? Either that or his point is simply moot. When he claims a Pakistani man will not find a bride in Iran because Iranians refuse to let their daughters marry foreigners, then by definition he is referring to Iranians sui generis. If not, then you will surely agree with me that his assertion is quite meaningless, for what Pakistani man would insist on marrying the daughter of Iranian racial nationalists who "hate Afghanistan, Pakistan and Turks with a passion", instead of being content with some female hailing from a family that does
not consist of racial nationalists? In that case, why claim he would "not find a bride"?
