What's new

Iran nuclear weapon is further off, Israel says

foxhound

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Apr 1, 2007
Messages
473
Reaction score
0
Salaam....:coffee:

ref:Iran nuclear weapon is further off, Israel says - Telegraph

Iran nuclear weapon is further off, Israel says

Iran no longer has the capability to create a nuclear weapon on its own, Israel's deputy prime minister said on Wednesday, in a new assessment that would seem to make military action less likely in the near future.
iran-missile_1611628c.jpg

Iranian missile testing - although Israel think Iran no longer has the nuclear capabilities.
By Richard Spencer, Middle East Correspondent 5:30PM GMT 29 Dec 2010

The new view lengthens considerably previous time frames of about a year, and suggests the programme has been seriously damaged by sabotage, sanctions or both. It lends weight to the theory that a highly sophisticated computer worm called Stuxnet was inserted successfully last year into Iran's uranium enrichment programme.

A report by a former United Nations weapons inspector last week said the worm might have forced the replacement of 1,000 uranium enrichment centrifuges at Iran's main facility.

Moshe Yaalon, the deputy prime minister, said western pressure would force Iran to consider whether its nuclear programme was worth pursuing. "I believe that this effort will grow, and will include areas beyond sanctions, to convince the Iranian regime that, effectively, it must choose between continuing to seek nuclear capability and surviving," he told Israeli radio. "I don't know if it will happen in 2011 or in 2012, but we are talking in terms of the next three years."

He did not refer specifically to claims that Stuxnet damaged the Iranian programme, but he said it was clear it had encountered "difficulties".

"These difficulties postpone the timeline, of course," he said. "Thus we cannot talk about a 'point of no return'. Iran does not currently have the ability to make a nuclear bomb on its own. I hope it won't succeed at all and that the Western world's effort will ultimately deny Iran a nuclear capability."

Iran has accused Israel and its western allies of responsibility for the murders of two Iranian nuclear scientists in Tehran this year.
Earlier this year, Iran began enriching uranium from 3.5 per cent – suitable for nuclear power – to 20 per cent, saying it was for a medical facility.

From 20 per cent, it is a relatively simple step to increase concentration to 90 per cent, the level necessary for a nuclear weapon.

Iran claims it has no interest in developing a nuclear weapon, and some analysts say the country will stop short of doing so, hoping that the presence of a "breakout" capability would be enough to give Iran the extra regional clout it seeks.

However, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad admitted last month that the enrichment process had been hit by a virus, without naming it. Computer virus analysts say Stuxnet was so complex it was probably written by a "state actor" rather than an amateur hacker.
The new report, written for the Institute of Science and International Security by a team including David Albright, its director and a former UN weapons inspector, found a link between the worm and the frequency at which Iran's centrifuges spin.

The worm contained a code setting the speed at 1064 Hertz – the correct notional speed – and increasing it suddenly to 1410, at which point the centrifuges would "tear apart". It noted that the number of centrifuges operating at Iran's Natanz facility fell by about 1,000 not long after the start point of the worm.
:pdf:
 
.
yeaa I had heard about this worm... stupid really.. why would Iran connect their nuclear installations to the internet??? they can keep them isolated from physical attacks but they leave them open online?? thats too stupid thing to do.... Iran needs a way to answer back.. I just hope they replace this idiot Ahmednijad and put in place a leader who does more and barks less.... Saudi american serfs need to be countered...
 
. .
yeaa I had heard about this worm... stupid really.. why would Iran connect their nuclear installations to the internet??? they can keep them isolated from physical attacks but they leave them open online?? thats too stupid thing to do.... Iran needs a way to answer back.. I just hope they replace this idiot Ahmednijad and put in place a leader who does more and barks less.... Saudi american serfs need to be countered...

virus could have infected the computers through inflected devices........

The worm contained a code setting the speed at 1064 Hertz – the correct notional speed – and increasing it suddenly to 1410, at which point the centrifuges would "tear apart". It noted that the number of centrifuges operating at Iran's Natanz facility fell by about 1,000 not long after the start point of the worm.

that also mean iran had lost all their centrifuges accured through A.Q. Khan network..

but also mean other centrifuges of the same catagory are also venerable to this virus....

pakistan , north korea.......??
 
Last edited:
.
that also mean iran had lost all their centrifuges accured through A.Q. Khan network..

sure if you say so
propaganda on its best. they even say Ben Laden is making parrot competition in Tehran and we can see him making fun there when CIA and so are still not able to find it .

i learned something that sadly works for humanity:
repeat many times the same stupid bullshit and then people believe in it
 
.
This will go on and on and on ....

Israel and Iran are never going to say any thing to each other ....

I base my prediction on the historical trend.

Since the last 1500 years, No one has ever picked a fight with Shia people.

Only Sunni have been targets of war.
 
.
Only Sunni have been targets of war.

yeah as all know
Iran was never attacked
Shias in Afghanistan (hazzaras) were not persecuted by talibans or killed
Iraq invaded by US troops mostly shia but ...
still some people see only sunnis being victims
LOL
 
.
yeah as all know
Iran was never attacked
Shias in Afghanistan (hazzaras) were not persecuted by talibans or killed
Iraq invaded by US troops mostly shia but ...
still some people see only sunnis being victims
LOL

You know well what i am saying ... be objective and analyze..

Name the last time, Iran was ever target of war from West ...
 
.
This will go on and on and on ....

Israel and Iran are never going to say any thing to each other ....

I base my prediction on the historical trend.

Since the last 1500 years, No one has ever picked a fight with Shia people.

Only Sunni have been targets of war.

assalam alaikum

May be u wanna write 500 instead 1500,

War can happen between iran and west if there is a conflict of interset. The iranian try to talk big and act big but when put to pressure will give concessions.

It has been years since we hear about the iranian nuclear programme with no results and so much talk by them ( iranians) i think if they were serious about it they should have kept a low profile of the programm just like all the nations.

Note : iraq was invaded by invitation of shia's ( chalabi , hakeem ,khoi, maliki etc i can give dozen if not hundereds)
TARIQ
 
.
You know well what i am saying ... be objective and analyze..

Name the last time, Iran was ever target of war from West ...
Iran was occupied by English and Russian not long time ago
English decided who would be the leader of our country: shah father then they didn't want him anymore and asked him to leave but he accepted only if his son was shah.
and so.
but not a direct war.

Pakistan was invaded by West?
Why you say sunnis are being victims only <- when in Iraq for exemple most muslims are shias.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom