What's new

Iran now using advanced centrifuges, violating nuclear deal

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
. .
Western demands on Iran are both reasonable and unchanged.

No nuclear weapons materials development, no ballistic missile development, and an end to support for militant groups operating outside of Iran.

Despite some Muslims' claims that because the west has nukes, Iran has some kinda right to nuclear weapons development, i think any weapons development by Muslim nations in the middle east region will only bring a large chance for large scale war in the region.

It's better to live in peace as a military underdog, than to go to war.
This is what too many Muslims refuse to understand, and they bring much suffering upon other Muslims by thinking like that and advocating for that.
 
.
Western demands on Iran are both reasonable and unchanged.

No nuclear weapons materials development, no ballistic missile development, and an end to support for militant groups operating outside of Iran.

Despite some Muslims' claims that because the west has nukes, Iran has some kinda right to nuclear weapons development, i think any weapons development by Muslim nations in the middle east region will only bring a large chance for large scale war in the region.

It's better to live in peace as a military underdog, than to go to war.
This is what too many Muslims refuse to understand, and they bring much suffering upon other Muslims by thinking like that and advocating for that.


So you want Iran to continue the deal, even after USA has withdrawn from it? A treaty/deal is defined as condition accepted by two or more parties, to carry out a agreed action. If one party withdraws from it, then others don't have to follow through.

Also, who is USA to dictate which countries can, and can't have nukes. It has only been USA that has used nukes on civilians of another country. It is USA that has lost its own nukes. It is USA that has accidentally dropped nukes on its own city. Its USA, that misplaced its nukes on 2 occasions.

It US, that has history of invading other countries, and causing millions of deaths. Its USA that has been at war for over 200 years. Its USA that have toppled governments in other countries. Its USA that has committed war crimes against civilians in other countries.

When you got rogue nation like USA on this planet, you need to have nukes. I support NK, Iran, Japan, any country to have nukes, as long as USA has them. Cause even if they did, only USA is the only inhuman nation to use them, while others, even Iran or NK, would never use them, only give threat about using them.
 
.
Jews want USA to attack Iran.

Just like in WW1, they used their media control by published bad things about Germany, to push USA leaders to be involved in the war.

But to be honest, the world is already very tired with all the BS.
 
.
So you want Iran to continue the deal, even after USA has withdrawn from it? A treaty/deal is defined as condition accepted by two or more parties, to carry out a agreed action. If one party withdraws from it, then others don't have to follow through.

Also, who is USA to dictate which countries can, and can't have nukes. It has only been USA that has used nukes on civilians of another country. It is USA that has lost its own nukes. It is USA that has accidentally dropped nukes on its own city. Its USA, that misplaced its nukes on 2 occasions.

It US, that has history of invading other countries, and causing millions of deaths. Its USA that has been at war for over 200 years. Its USA that have toppled governments in other countries. Its USA that has committed war crimes against civilians in other countries.

When you got rogue nation like USA on this planet, you need to have nukes. I support NK, Iran, Japan, any country to have nukes, as long as USA has them. Cause even if they did, only USA is the only inhuman nation to use them, while others, even Iran or NK, would never use them, only give threat about using them.

you're displaying exactly the kinda attitude that i mentioned.

"only give threat about using them"?? that's a delusion.

as is your notion that the US starts wars. from the expansion of communism to battling in the war on terror, the US has been on the defense or pre-emptive defense against those who seek military parity while not respecting our way of life even when we can stay out of their neighborhoods.

i wouldn't want to be ruled by Chinese or Muslim values / doctrines, nor oppressed by terror tactics and/or shady international diplomacy.
so i support even pre-emptive action to ensure that western values and isreali values are respected by Muslim, Chinese, and Russian rulers.

frankly your whipering about not having equal weaponry sounds completely foolish to me.
you could be living in peace and prosperity if you'd give up your aggression against Israelis and westerners.

once again, we didn't start the war on terror, not in any conceivable way.
i would like however to see it end on our terms rather than those of any of our foes.
 
.
.

What is there to wonder? Iran reserves the right to enrich uranium.

you're displaying exactly the kinda attitude that i mentioned.

"only give threat about using them"?? that's a delusion.

as is your notion that the US starts wars. from the expansion of communism to battling in the war on terror, the US has been on the defense or pre-emptive defense against those who seek military parity while not respecting our way of life even when we can stay out of their neighborhoods.

i wouldn't want to be ruled by Chinese or Muslim values / doctrines, nor oppressed by terror tactics and/or shady international diplomacy.
so i support even pre-emptive action to ensure that western values and isreali values are respected by Muslim, Chinese, and Russian rulers.

frankly your whipering about not having equal weaponry sounds completely foolish to me.
you could be living in peace and prosperity if you'd give up your aggression against Israelis and westerners.

once again, we didn't start the war on terror, not in any conceivable way.
i would like however to see it end on our terms rather than those of any of our foes.

Why don't you just pi$$ off from this forum? You are not welcome here. No one is interested in your right wing BS. This is not KKK forum.
 
.
you're displaying exactly the kinda attitude that i mentioned.

"only give threat about using them"?? that's a delusion.

as is your notion that the US starts wars. from the expansion of communism to battling in the war on terror, the US has been on the defense or pre-emptive defense against those who seek military parity while not respecting our way of life even when we can stay out of their neighborhoods.

i wouldn't want to be ruled by Chinese or Muslim values / doctrines, nor oppressed by terror tactics and/or shady international diplomacy.
so i support even pre-emptive action to ensure that western values and isreali values are respected by Muslim, Chinese, and Russian rulers.

frankly your whipering about not having equal weaponry sounds completely foolish to me.
you could be living in peace and prosperity if you'd give up your aggression against Israelis and westerners.

once again, we didn't start the war on terror, not in any conceivable way.
i would like however to see it end on our terms rather than those of any of our foes.


Your comment is full of Islamophobic. Your comment just showed you are the delusion one. I can say the same like you, I don't want to be ruled by bloodthirsty Americans or their masters the jews.

The fact, that you think Terrosim was not started by USA, just shows you are high (maybe cut down on the weed). Did you forget, Taliban was formed by CIA? Osama sat in the White house with the president. Did you forget all that. Must be all the weed you have been smoking.

And you thinking other should not have a chance to defend themselves, mean you are same as the Americans. Lets hope a 9/11 type thing doesn't happen in Netherlands. It would be a shame :-)
 
Last edited:
.
Western demands on Iran are both reasonable and unchanged.

No nuclear weapons materials development, no ballistic missile development, and an end to support for militant groups operating outside of Iran.

Despite some Muslims' claims that because the west has nukes, Iran has some kinda right to nuclear weapons development, i think any weapons development by Muslim nations in the middle east region will only bring a large chance for large scale war in the region.

It's better to live in peace as a military underdog, than to go to war.
This is what too many Muslims refuse to understand, and they bring much suffering upon other Muslims by thinking like that and advocating for that.
You need to stop trolling. You're biased, so you always either ignore the violations/wrongs of the West, or u focus on highlighting the wrong on developing countries.

you're displaying exactly the kinda attitude that i mentioned.

"only give threat about using them"?? that's a delusion.

as is your notion that the US starts wars. from the expansion of communism to battling in the war on terror, the US has been on the defense or pre-emptive defense against those who seek military parity while not respecting our way of life even when we can stay out of their neighborhoods.

i wouldn't want to be ruled by Chinese or Muslim values / doctrines, nor oppressed by terror tactics and/or shady international diplomacy.
so i support even pre-emptive action to ensure that western values and isreali values are respected by Muslim, Chinese, and Russian rulers.

frankly your whipering about not having equal weaponry sounds completely foolish to me.
you could be living in peace and prosperity if you'd give up your aggression against Israelis and westerners.

once again, we didn't start the war on terror, not in any conceivable way.
i would like however to see it end on our terms rather than those of any of our foes.
Weak westerners are too afraid to lose lives to achieve their goal of "resetting" Iran. you seem bored. Like i said b4, the world has already changed. All westerners can do about Iran is sanction, spy and sabotage, but obviously, all these attempts arent enough to make Iran fold, and thats why you're on PDF posting troll posts, cuz the west cant achieve their goals in Iran. You weaklings just hide behind NATO. Without US you europeans would have done a deal or secret deal with Iran already.
 
.
So israel can develop nuclear weapons and Iran cannot do the same?
 
. .

Wrong headlines. It was the US who violated the deal, Iranians stuck to it far long after US pulled out. Its the spineless Europeans who are to blame for this as well.
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom