The Iranians didn't just wake up one day and decide to hold American diplomats captive for no good reason.You are still pretending that you don't understand, do you? Those "diplomats" were CIAspies actively involved in causing mischief in Iran - attempting to overthrow the Iranian goverment as planned by the CIA. That is the whole issue but it seems that your love for Western imperialism blinds you to the facts.
What fucking logic is that?
Do you even have a remote idea about provisions of Vienna convention on diplomatic relation 1961 of whom Iran is also a signatory.
United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law
Article 22: confirms the inviolability of mission premises – barring any right of entry by law enforcement officers of the receiving State and imposing on the receiving State a special duty to protect the premises against intrusion, damage, disturbance of the peace or infringement of dignity. Even in response to abuse of this inviolability or emergency, the premises may not be entered without the consent of the head of mission.
Article 24: ensures the inviolability of mission archives and documents – even outside mission premises – so that the receiving State may not seize or inspect them or permit their use in legal proceedings.
Article 27 guarantees free communication between a mission and its sending State by all appropriate means, and ensures that the diplomatic bag carrying such communications may not be opened or detained even on suspicion of abuse. Given the purposes of diplomatic missions, secure communication for information and instructions is probably the most essential of all immunities.
Article 29 provides inviolability for the person of diplomats and article 31 establishes their immunity from civil and criminal jurisdiction – with precise exceptions to immunity from civil jurisdiction where previous State practice had varied. Immunity from jurisdiction – like other immunities and privileges – may be waived by the sending State, and article 32 specifies the rules on waiver. Article 34 sets out the tax exemption accorded to diplomats along with detailed exceptions in respect of matters unrelated to their official duties or to ordinary life in the receiving State. Article 36 provides for exemption from customs duties on diplomatic imports throughout a diplomat’s posting.
Articles 37 sets out a complex code for the treatment of families and junior staff – where as pointed out above previous practice was varied and negotiation of a compromise difficult. Article 38 bars from all privileges and immunities, except for immunity for their official acts, nationals and permanent residents of the receiving State. These two provisions in many States drastically reduced the numbers of those persons more likely to bring into disrepute the system of privileges and immunities and were fully in accordance with the basic justification applied throughout the Convention of limiting immunities to what is essential to ensure the efficient performance of the functions of diplomatic missions as representing States.
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Here is some literature on diplomatic immunity which forms part of same treaty.
Diplomatic immunity is a form of
legal immunity that ensures that
diplomats are given safe passage and are considered not susceptible to
lawsuit or
prosecution under the host country's laws, although they can still be
expelled.
Diplomatic immunity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And here an article which gives relation between espionage and diplomacy
Diplomacy is closely linked to espionage or gathering of intelligence. Embassies are bases for both diplomats and spies, and some diplomats are essentially openly acknowledged spies. For instance, the job of
military attachés includes learning as much as possible about the military of the nation to which they are assigned. They do not try to hide this role and, as such, are only invited to events allowed by their hosts, such as military parades or
air shows. There are also deep-cover spies operating in many embassies. These individuals are given fake positions at the embassy, but their main task is to illegally gather intelligence, usually by coordinating spy rings of locals or other spies. For the most part, spies operating out of embassies gather little intelligence themselves and their identities tend to be known by the opposition. If discovered, these diplomats can be expelled from an embassy, but for the most part
counter-intelligence agencies prefer to keep these agents
in situ and under close monitoring.
The information gathered by spies plays an increasingly important role in diplomacy. Arms-control treaties would be impossible without the power of
reconnaissance satellites and agents to monitor compliance. Information gleaned from espionage is useful in almost all forms of diplomacy, everything from trade agreements to border disputes.
Diplomacy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
to sum it up nicely
1. Embassies, each and every one of them is a den of spies. Espionage is an integral part of Embassy's functions. The cry of US embassy being CIA den is a pure baloney.
2. Diplomatic immunity is absolute. Even if a diplomat rape and kills an Iranian by skinning him/her alive and wear his/her skin as a pelt, he can't be prosecuted in Iran unless his parent country waves immunity. This is the extent to which ironclad immunity is provided to diplomats and i have already shown that embassy premise in inviolable.
The end to which embassy premise was being used simply
does not matter. Iran is a signatory of Vienna
convention and takeover of embassy was an out and out criminal act on part of Iranian regime.
You are either not very smart or simply dishonest.
Refrain from name calling especially in situation when your opponent is intellectually superior to you.