What's new

Iran has enriched enough uranium to make bomb, IAEA says

BanglaBhoot

RETIRED TTA
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
8,839
Reaction score
5
Country
France
Location
France
UN nuclear watchdog's report says Iran appeared to have slowed the rate at which enrichment capacity is expanding



The UN's nuclear watchdog reported today that Iran had managed to enrich a metric tonne of low enriched uranium (LEU), which UN officials say is technically enough to build a nuclear weapon.

UN officials cautioned that there remained many practical obstacles to the production of a bomb, and pointed out that the uranium was under close surveillance, and the report issued by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said Iran appeared to have slowed down the rate at which its uranium enrichment capacity is expanding. But the report is likely to raise further the already high tensions surrounding the Iranian nuclear programme.

One respected US analyst said that the tonne milestone meant that Iran had reached "breakout capacity" - the theoretical ability to produce the 20-25 kg highly enriched uranium needed for one functioning warhead. Others were more cautious but said there was plenty more in the report to raise the level of international concern.

The IAEA said that Iran had put a roof over a "heavy-water" nuclear reactor being built near the town of Arak, capable and was preventing agency inspectors from carrying out ground inspections, meaning that they no longer had any way of seeing what was being done at the facility, which could potentially produce plutonium.

Iran is also refusing to tell the IAEA where it is manufacturing the centrifuges used to enrich uranium, so the agency cannot confirm how many are being produced and where they are being installed.

In a separate report released at the same time, the IAEA said traces of uranium taken from the site of an alleged nuclear reactor in Syria were manmade and rejected the Syrian government's claim that the uranium had come from Israeli missiles used to destroy the site in 2007.

The report on the Dair Alzour site puts enormous pressure on Damascus as it rejects the Syrian explanation for the presence of uranium and denounces the government for its lack of cooperation with the agency's inquiry.

Together, the reports on Iran and Syria add greater urgency to international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation, and in particular, bring closer the possibility of a military confrontation between Iran and Israel, which has declared it will not tolerate Iran reaching nuclear weapons capability.

The IAEA report on Iran surprised many proliferation experts because, it recorded a dramatic jump in Iranian stockpiles of LEU at the enrichment plant at Natanz. In its last report in November, the IAEA estimated that Iran had produced 635 kg of LEU, based partly on Iranian government figures.

The agency now estimates that Iran had produced 839 kg of LEU by November, and that Iran had reported producing a further 171 kg in the following two months - a total of 1010 kg. The Iranian LEU has less than a 4% concentration of the fissile isotope Uranium 235. To make weapons grade HEU, with a concentration of 80-90%, it has to be further enriched, by being passed through massed 'cascades' of centrifuges.

"Do they have enough LEU to produce a 'significant quantity' of HEU [enough for a bomb]? Yes, if you count the U235 atoms then they do have a significant quantity of HEU," a senior official close to the IAEA said. "But it is theoretical and they would need to use their full capacity to do so. They are not there yet. If they were to build another clandestine facility, then that would be different."

The official added that: "The nuclear material has been under containment and surveillance at all times."

UN officials also stressed that the number of centrifuges at Natanz actually being used to enrich uranium had increased relatively little since the last report in November, from 3,800 to nearly 4,000. But it also found a roughly 1,500 additional centrifuges had been installed and were "under vacuum", a preparatory step before enrichment can start.

David Albright, a veteran UN weapons inspector, who now heads the independent Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) in Washington, gave a blunter assessment.

"They have reached a nuclear weapons breakout capability. You can dance about it, but they would have enough to make 20-25 kg of weapons-grade HEU," Albright said. "If they break out they will do it at a clandestine facility, not at Natanz, so you can't use Natanz as a measure of how fast they could do it. The Iranians have stopped telling the IAEA about the production of centrifuges … so the agency doesn't know how many they are making."

Another western analyst, speaking on condition of anonymity, argued that due to the wastage involved in making a first nuclear device, Iran would need a few more hundred kilograms of LEU to reach breakout capacity, but added that the country appeared "well on its way" to that milestone.

Daryl Kimball, the head of the Arms Control Association in Washington argued that Iran's LEU stockpile was not the most worrying aspect of the new IAEA report.

"The report shows that Iran is slowly amassing an LEU stockpile but that stockpile we must remember is safeguarded. Iran can't divert that quantity without being very obvious," Kimball said.

"What should be of concern is that the IAEA is becoming less able to provide an accurate picture of what is going on. We don't know where centrifuges are being manufactured and whether they are being delivered to Natanz or somewhere else. And we cannot remotely see what is happening at [a] heavy water facility under construction at Arak, and whether that is being used for peaceful purposes."

Iran has enriched enough uranium to make bomb, IAEA says | World news | guardian.co.uk
 
Binyamin Netanyahu targets Iran after he is appointed Prime Minister

Binyamin Netanyahu described Iran as the greatest threat that Israel has ever faced and failed to mention stalled talks with the Palestinians after he was asked to be the country's new Prime Minister today.

In a speech made outside the residence of President Shimon Peres, the Likud leader said that protecting Israel would be his greatest responsibility as leader, and condemned "formidable" challenges posed by the Islamic Republic.

However, he did not once mention the stalled Israeli-Palestinian peace process or a two-state solution throughout his address, omissions that will cause concern within an Obama administration determined to advance the peace process.

The Likud leader held a brief press conference alongside President Peres after he was appointed to form a coalition government, despite only finishing a close second in Israel's election.

"Iran is seeking to obtain a nuclear weapon and constitutes the gravest threat to our existence since the war of independence," Mr Netanyahu said.

Referring to the Iranian-backed Hezbollah movement in south Lebanon, Mr Netanyahu said: "The terrorist forces of Iran threaten us from the north. For decades, Israel has not faced such formidable challenges.

"The responsibility we face is to achieve security for our country, peace with our neighbours and unity among us."

He spoke after the UN announced yesterday that Iran had enriched sufficient uranium to amass a nuclear bomb – a third more than previously thought. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran has caused alarm in the West over its apparent threats to Israel and support for radical Islamist groups Hamas and Hezbollah.

Mr Netanyahu's selection to form a coalition comes despite a narrow defeat in Israel's general election by Tzipi Livni of the centrist Kadima party, who had pledged to advance the peace process with the Palestinians.

After taking soundings from all political parties, Mr Peres judged the Likud leader to have a significantly better chance of building a viable coalition after he won the backing of Avigdor Lieberman's ultra-nationalist Yisrel Beitenu party, which finished third in the national poll.

President Peres said today that, overall, 65 out of 120 seats in Israel's Parliament, the Knesset, backed Mr Netanyahu.

However, concerns arose within minutes of his appointment as to how viable any coalition led by Mr Netanyahu would be, with both Kadima and Ehud Barak, the Labour leader, appearing to choose going into opposition rather than joining his coalition.

This would leave Mr Netanyahu relying on the nationalist Mr Lieberman, who has advocated deporting Arab Israelis who fail to swear an oath of loyalty to the state, and the ultra-orthodox Shas party, whose main focus is the funding of its religious seminaries and schools.

There are fears that Shas and Yisrael Beitenu may also clash with each other in any future coalition, as Mr Lieberman – a staunch secularist – strongly opposes religious schools and seminaries and wants to introduce civil marriages to appease his secular Russian support base, something that Shas staunchly opposes.

A similarly narrow coalition, formed by Mr Netanyahu in 1996, lasted only two years before collapsing after right-wing parties withdrew their support following territorial concessions to the Palestinians.

Making a last-ditch attempt to avoid what many Israelis would regard as an illegitimate government, Mr Netanyahu used his speech to make a final plea for Ms Livni and Mr Barak to join his administration.

"I call on Kadima chairwoman Tzipi Livni and Labour Party chairman Ehud Barak and I say to them – let’s unite to secure the future of the State of Israel," he told reporters.

"I ask to meet with you first to discuss with you a broad national unity government for the good of the people and the state."

Yet, Ms Livni appeared to have ruled the move out, saying that she would not support a leader who would prevent progress in the peace process. Mr Barak has already declared that Labour should go into opposition to rebuild itself.

"I will not be able to serve as a cover for a lack of direction. I want to lead Israel in a way I believe in, to advance a peace process based on two states for two peoples," Ms Livni said, after her final meeting with President Peres.

The new administration would also run into immediate conflict with President Obama who has urged a speeding up of the peace process and has tried to cool hostile rhetoric with Iran.

Instead of territorial compromise, Mr Netanyahu has indicated that he prefers economic development measures in the West Bank that allow Israel to maintain continued security control over borders and no dismantling of settlements.

Mahmoud Abbas, the moderate Palestinian President, this afternoon threatened a complete freeze in relations with any Israeli state led by a politician who does not believe in the two-state solution. This would be disastrous for the West, which has pumped billions into the West Bank in order to prop up his authority in anticipation of a future Palestinian state being built there.

"We will not deal with the Israeli government unless it accepts a two-state solution and accepts to halt settlements and to respect past accords," Nabil Abu Rudeina, President Abbas's spokesman, said.

Binyamin Netanyahu targets Iran after he is appointed Prime Minister - Times Online
 
Military strikes against Iran no longer an option: IAEA chief
Updated at: 2215 PST, Friday, February 20, 2009
PARIS: UN nuclear watchdog chief Mohamed El Baradei said in an interview to be broadcast Sunday that he believed the possibility of a military solution to the Iran nuclear crisis had been ruled out.

"I believe so," he said when asked if he thought that after US President George W. Bush stood down it was no longer likely that there would be a military strike.

"Force can only be used as a last option when all other political possibilities have been exhausted. I don't think we've done that yet," he told Radio France International.

The comments came a day after International Atomic Energy Agency said Iran was continuing to enrich uranium, a key stage in the atom bomb making process, but had slowed down the expansion of its enrichment activities.

The IAEA report conceded that, despite six years of intensive investigation, it was no closer to determining whether Iran's disputed nuclear drive is as peaceful as Tehran claims.
Military strikes against Iran no longer an option: IAEA chief
 
Is this the same El Baredei whose pussyfooting on Iraqi WMD gave the US the oppurtunity to invade Iraq?

I think he feels a bit guilty in his role, and wants to mitigate any similar action against Iran by declaring this WMD capability, focring the US to come to the negotiating table.

I do not believe that the Iranians are anywhere near a bomb.
 
Everyday a New Report, One day Iran is Close to Declare herself as Nuclear Nation, Other day Iran is 10 Years Behind on Nuclear Program and Iran Is Not a Threat, one Other day Iran is a Enriching then Iran is Not Enriching and soooooo on.

Israel is Having Elections and They will Exploit This Report Most Efficiently To win Elections.
 
What is most worrying is that Netenyahu has formed the government and is saying these things. He is known as a hawk and there is no doubt he is dumb enough to attack Iran. All the reports now coming out suggest things are now moving in that direction and there seems to be a rift between the US and Isreal on this. Higher oil prices now would kill the US economy.
 
What Iran's nuclear milestone means

Iran's nuclear program is cause for concern, but not for the reasons you think.


By Jacqueline Shire

There are plenty of reasons to pay close attention to Iran's nuclear progress, but the new International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report showing that the country has accumulated 1010 kg of low-enriched uranium is not at the top of my list.

That's not to say that this milestone is insignificant. We now know that Iran has accumulated enough low-enriched uranium (LEU) to yield sufficient high-enriched uranium for a single nuclear weapon should Iran decide to seize the material, which is under IAEA safeguards, further enrich it, and in violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, use the material in a nuclear warhead. Luckily, given the international crisis this action would certainly provoke, Iran is unlikely to attempt the feat.

We've also learned that Iran has achieved its objective of successfully operating several thousand centrifuges. This has been a gradual process that began in earnest two years ago.

The report generated further concern because of a discrepancy in the accounting of Iran's uranium. According to senior U.N. officials, the discrepancy, which resulted in the underreporting of LEU in the November 2008 report by 209 kg, was an engineering miscalculation on Iran's part and not a deliberate attempt to mislead the IAEA. The net effect is that Iran crossed the so-called breakout threshold a few months earlier than expected.

While legitimate cause for worry, these headlines obscure other equally important developments. One is that although Iran has installed upwards of 5,400 centrifuges, it continues to operate just under 4,000 of them, bringing into operation only one additional cascade of centrifuges since November. Is Iran suddenly more attuned to the optics of its nuclear program? Hard to say, especially given that it continues to stonewall the IAEA on access to a heavy water reactor under construction at Arak, and refuses to even discuss a set of documents that allegedly show research into nuclear warhead design.

Potentially more troubling is Iran's refusal to allow IAEA inspection of nuclear facilities not covered under traditional safeguards, in particular places where centrifuges are manufactured and stored. The consequence is that the IAEA has little knowledge of how many centrifuges Iran is manufacturing and where they are. It is conceivable therefore that Iran could make centrifuges that are not destined for the inspected site at Natanz, but for a clandestine facility. Because of another change that Iran unilaterally made to its safeguards relationship with the IAEA, it has declared that it will only inform the IAEA of new nuclear facilities six months before they become operational.

These are the fine-print details of Iran's relationship with Vienna that don't garner flashy headlines, but are the real reason to keep a close eye on Iran's actions.

What Iran's nuclear milestone means - By Jacqueline Shire | The Argument
 
These reports of Iran going to have a bomb is BS BS BS BS.....Everyone knows Iran has the CAPACITY to make a nuclear bomb, no doubt about it. Now it's a matter if they are going to make one or not. They have been saying for years that Iran is going to have a bomb in two years and after two years are going do it AGAIN and AGAIN etc....Iran does NOT need a nuclear bomb right now, but it would be nice. Iran could easily destroy Israel with their stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, but that would be plain suicide, because they would be nuked. These BS articles are only there to scare people.

U.S. does not have the balls to attack Iran right now, because they are busy getting their butt handed to them in Afghanistan and Iraq. If they attack Iran, which will not happen anytime soon...you can kiss those U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan good bye. Iran will be 1000 times worse than Afghanistan and Iraq combined and will cause more chaos in Iraq and Afghanistan NOT to mention closing the oil supplies to America and finishing of their already torn apart economy. Do people actually believe the U.S. can sell another war right now????...If they really wanted to attack Iran; they would have already done it, like in the Case of Iraq when they destroyed Iraq nuclear facilities and not to mention the attack on Syria site back in 2007 I think. Did they warn them they were going to attack?.....let me answer it NO, because it would be PLAIN STUPID on their part.
 
that is fine!!

it is there right i guess, but i wish that muslims were with enough sense to join there hand together!! the Iran have always been more close to Indai than it have ever been to Pakistan! even in the profilation scandle the iranies authorities blamed Pakistani Scientists where as in fanct there were many Indains working there!!
 
Iranis are quite frankly dumb.Coming on International TV and Iranin President speaking about exterminating Israel and then working on nuclear bomb and they don't even have nuclear bomb now.We have nuclear bombs and our Prime Minister or President never warned to annihilate any other country.
 
Iranis are quite frankly dumb.Coming on International TV and Iranin President speaking about exterminating Israel and then working on nuclear bomb and they don't even have nuclear bomb now.We have nuclear bombs and our Prime Minister or President never warned to annihilate any other country.

slam...dunk...and score.

Well done saadahmed bhai. :agree:
 
Iranis are quite frankly dumb.Coming on International TV and Iranin President speaking about exterminating Israel and then working on nuclear bomb and they don't even have nuclear bomb now.We have nuclear bombs and our Prime Minister or President never warned to annihilate any other country.


you are quite right with the comment!

only one point that goes in favour may be that the Iranies may have felt that the US is going tto attack this oil and resource rich country sooner rather than later, so just in defence they started to flex there militery muscel only to warn the enemies of the dire consequencies!!!
 
IRAN is too far to make atomic bomb ,enrichment percentage of uranium to make atomic bomb is 95 % but IRAN is on only 5 % , uranium enrichment is a complex process ,IRAN have to do alot to achieve their goal
 
U.S. Says Iran Has Material for Bomb

WASHINGTON — The United States now believes that Iran has amassed enough uranium that with further purification could be used to build an atomic bomb, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff declared Sunday.

The statement by the chairman, Adm. Mike Mullen, went further than previous, official judgments of the Iranian nuclear threat, and it essentially confirmed a new report by the United Nations nuclear watchdog agency, which found that Iran had enough nuclear material for a bomb.

“We think they do, quite frankly,” Admiral Mullen said on “State of the Union” on CNN. “And Iran having a nuclear weapon, I’ve believed for a long time, is a very, very bad outcome for the region and for the world.”

The International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations agency, reported Feb. 19 that its inspectors had found that Iran understated by a third how much uranium it had enriched.

In its study, the agency declared for the first time that the amount of low-enriched uranium that Tehran had stockpiled, estimated at more than a ton, was sufficient to make an atomic bomb, but only with added purification.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, also appearing on a Sunday television talk show, emphasized that Iran still lacked the ability to build a nuclear arsenal rapidly.

“They’re not close to a stockpile,” Mr. Gates said on “Meet the Press” on NBC. “They’re not close to a weapon at this point. And so, there is some time.”

The Obama administration came to office expressing a desire to increase the dialogue with Iran; disclosures of the new assessments will be likely to add urgency and difficulty to that effort. Iran insists that its nuclear program is for the peaceful pursuit of energy supplies.

Mr. Gates underscored the opportunities for diplomatic efforts to halt Iran’s nuclear ambitions, especially with the drop in oil prices and broader global economic pressures.

“The question is whether you can increase the level of the sanctions and the cost to the Iranians of pursuing that program, at the same time you show them an open door if they want to engage with the Europeans, with us and so on if they walk away from that program,” Mr. Gates said.

“There are economic costs to this program,” he added. “They do have economic challenges at home.”

The Obama administration is deep into a series of foreign and national security policy reviews, including how to manage relations with Iran, which overlaps with how Washington deals with other foreign partners and rivals.

For example, a view is emerging within the administration of a possible way to link a compromise on missile defense with Russia to diplomatic progress in halting Iran’s nuclear program.

The United States says its planned missile defense sites in Poland and the Czech Republic are needed to guard against a potential Iranian nuclear attack, while Russia vehemently complains that those systems are designed to thwart the Russian arsenal.

Obama administration officials may propose that if Russia wants the United States to rethink its plans for building two missile defense sites in Europe, then the Kremlin must do more to help halt Iran’s nuclear program.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/02/washington/02military.html?_r=1&hp
 
If I was a prime minister of Pakistan I would give iran 10 nuclear weapons -as gift , and go into an alliance - You give us free oil , we will send you JF17 THUNDER and ALKhalid :pakistan::rofl:
 
Back
Top Bottom