When i said that, this shows how Obsessed u r, yes we banned them we put him under house arrest, What u ppl expect u say & we do it, We need proof to convict him ,
The same proofs were enough for the international community but Pakistan is something which needs something out of box.
provide us with that & stick to one stance, Decide who is the master Mind & say ur PM to decide what he wants to do(HINT:Sharm Al Sheikh)
what 'Denial mode'? U are going to define our destiny & the way we handle our country, Keep ur Ideas to urself...
Well it was your media which was shouting at the top of voice that proof of Indian involvement is given to India but later Rehman Malik comes on TV and says no such dossier was given to India.
There is always a coarse of investigation where you have your findings. It is not like in a single day an angel comes to you and says that this particular person is involved. There was investigation in the matter and it was found who was the actual culprit.
SUSPECTED ROLE, I don't need to say more
[/quote]
During the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, which was backed by Pakistan, [61] India had supported the opposition Northern Alliance.[62] After the fall of the Taliban in 2001, India opened four consulates in Herat, Mazari Sharif, Kandahar and Jalalabad and backed Hamid Karzai's government. India is Afghanistan's fifth-largest bilateral donor[63] and its growing presence in post-war Afghanistan has caused much concern in Pakistan as it views Indian measures as a threat to its influence in the region.[64][65][66] The President of Pakistan, Pervez Musharraf, accused Afghan President Hamid Karzai of favoring India.[67] Islamabad has also reportedly accused Indian consulates in Kandahar and Jalalabad of providing arms and money to insurgents in Pakistan's troubled Balochistan region,[68] a claim repeated by Urdu newspapers in Pakistan. Some analysts thus claim that Pakistan had a strong motive to target Indian nationals and their economic projects in Afghanistan.[69]
The statement by Afghan President Hamid Karzai noted that "enemies of Afghan-India ties were behind attack" without clearly specifying which enemies.[70] On 7 July 2008, Afghanistan's Interior Ministry claimed that the attack was carried in collaboration with a "a regional intelligence service"[71] and added that the bombers received training in Pakistan.[72] Afghanistan has in the past blamed Pakistan for various terror incidents on its soil[73] and there have been reports of Afghan officials blaming Pakistan for the attack on the Indian embassy.[74][75] According to the Times of India, Indian intelligence officials suspect that Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) had a role to play in this attack.[76] Indian security analyst Ajai Sahni of the Institute of Conflict Management alleged that, "the ISI-backed Taliban will not allow any Indian consolidation in Afghanistan, nor will they allow any stability in Kabul."[77]
Denying its involvement in the attacks, a Taliban spokesman said in a statement, "they (India) send secret military experts to Afghanistan and they train [the] Afghan army. Had we carried out the attack, we would have claimed responsibility for it with pride since we have good reasons for it." The Taliban further stated that the attack had its roots in the regional Indo-Pakistan rivalry.[78] On 8 July, Afghanistan stated that it had no doubts that the attack was carried out in collaboration with "foreign intelligence agencies", an implicit reference to Pakistan's ISI.[79] However, Prime minister of Pakistan Yousaf Raza Gillani denied any involvement of ISI in the attack and also remarked that his country had no interest in destabilizing Afghanistan.[80] US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stated, "I haven't seen any evidence or proof that foreign agents were involved" and added that the United States was offering help to Afghan and Indian governments to investigate further.[81]
On 13 July India stated their suspicions about the ISI's involvement in the attack. India’s National Security Advisor M.K. Narayanan said, "We have no doubt that the ISI is behind this." [82]
On 1 August 2008, The New York Times reported that unnamed officials in the United States had confirmed Pakistani involvement in the anti-Indian attack.[83] The newspaper reported allegations that the involvement was based on intercepted communications between Pakistani intelligence officers and the perpetrators before the attack, which, however, were not detailed enough to warn of any specific attack. They want to say that the deputy director of the C.I.A., Stephen R. Kappes, had been ordered to Islamabad before the attack took place. US officials noted that Pakistani involvement in the attack calls into question the reliability of Pakistan as an ally in the American war on terror.[83]. Pakistani foreign ministry spokesman, Mohammed Sadiq, described the report as "total rubbish" and said there was no evidence of ISI involvement. "The foreign newspapers keep writing such things against ISI, and we reject these allegations."[9] An alleged intercepted telephone conversation apparently revealed that ISI agents masterminded the operation. The United States also claimed to have arrested an ISI officer inside Afghanistan. United States President George W. Bush confronted Pakistani prime minister Yusuf Raza Gillani in Washington D.C. with evidence of ISI's involvement in the Kabul attack and warned that in the case of another attack he would have to take "serious action".[84]
On 15 October, both India and Pakistan agreed to continue their dialogue to address all bilateral issues, including cross-border terrorism and ceasefire violations. At the meeting, however, Islamabad denied any role of the ISI in the 7 July bombings of the Indian embassy in Kabul. Pakistan's National Security Advisor Mahmud Ali Durrani said "No No No Incorrect" when asked to comment on reports alleging that ISI masterminded the Kabul blasts. It was also clarified that the Kabul bombings will be discussed in detail at the meeting of the joint anti-terror mechanism later the same month.[85]
On 23 October, it was reported that India had shared sensitive information with Pakistan that pointed towards the ISI's alleged complicity in the embassy bombing as both countries ended a special meeting of their joint-terror mechanism on a "positive" note.
