What's new

Iran banning the morality police

Then please get your entire family out of "uncivilized" USA where people present their women / mothers / daughters in thongs and bikinis to the world. You stop with your hypocrisy. Don't stay in jungle USA and go to the glorious "Islamic" Emirate of Afghanistan where your heroes the Taliban have developed the most advanced society in human history. Same goes for you too, Hussain0216 as you have lived in the West all your life and seen first-hand "the consequences of debauchery and feminist ideology". Leave "sinful" West and emigrate to the "I"EA.
My Family still in Pakistan idiot, and what you missed in my post that west has their own culture and Iran has their own, west don't give sh!t about Arab women or Iranian's its just political game, but I don't think you have the mental capacity to understand that, ciao :)
 
.
a practice that two person must have consent, wonder its also the case for rape .

So what is the different with prostitution or free sex in Western world ? Both are also having mutual consent of both male and female. The different is just it is covered by ritual of Shia Islam
 
.
Skirt size= freedom according to some ligandus on this forum no wonder the quality of posts and threads has gone down, PDF had a great run.

No

Vulgarity, over sexualising society and the people is a harm that costs EVERYONE

Especially the family, the home, children, men and women alike

Look at the west, look how feminist ideology and debauchery and rampant sexualising of society has destroyed the family, marriage and is now causing irreparable harm to men and women alike


If anything happens we need to resist this nonsense
White lads are marrying outside of whites to keep the family system going this skirt-size freedom has ruined the west.
 
.
Skirt size= freedom according to some ligandus on this forum no wonder the quality of posts and threads has gone down, PDF had a great run.


White lads are marrying outside of whites to keep the family system going this skirt-size freedom has ruined the west.


Honestly if you really look at what the feminist ideology has done to women here, the loss of femininity, decency and over sexualised behaviour it's crazy

This is what the lgbt culture piggys backs off of

Women here are racking up crazy body counts refering to it as a "Ho phase" going through their 20s looking for a man who society has depicted as perfect, ie tall, rich

So about 10-20% of the men are inundated by almost all women and these guys are banging and dumping their way through

The women then become increasingly damaged and by the time they hit their 30s hold so much damage and history that relationships and marriage become difficult

So they either get stuck or settle for some low option male, and almost guarantee a failed marriage

Whilst courts, the institute of marriage itself is totally against men


I could go on, it's a DISASTER of epic proportions that isn't talked about enough and it seems from feminist ideology, rampant sexualising of society and culture





ANYONE who starts the argument that Muslims should abandon their values, morals and culture to embrace these ideologies needs to be immediately challenged
 
.
My Family still in Pakistan idiot

Then go back to Pakistan from "sinful" West and see if you can convince your family's females to depart with you to the glorious "I"EA where "sin" is prohibited but hunger, homelessness, disease and no development is joyfully halaal.

and what you missed in my post that west has their own culture and Iran has their own

What "Iran culture" ? This ? You are imposing your own perverse mullah thoughts on Iranis, something that they rejected so vociferously :
They chant "Marg bar dictator", call for overthrow of Mullah Khamenei and his mullah regime and its milita Basij and IRGC and all that whom all you are shilling for here. Are you being more Irani than the Iranis ?

Did you know that your Mullah Khomenei, the spiritual leader of the fake Islamic revolution of 1979, was sitting comfortably in Paris under the asylum of the French NATO government and that most of the agitation against the shah was done by the Irani leftists including Communists ? And after that job had been done NATO sent in Mullah Khomenei to Tehran to take over the country because a mullah is what NATO wanted instead of those "abhorrent" commies governing Iran. Can't have another country in the Eastern Bloc. So Khomenei grandly stepped off the flight from Paris in 1979 and imposed the hijab among other things and waged war against Socialist Iraq including having sent brainwashed or unwilling adolescent boys across minefields so that the mines burst and the drafted military gets to go across and the pre-teen boys get to go to heaven.

west don't give sh!t about Arab women or Iranian's its just political game, but I don't think you have the mental capacity to understand that, ciao :)

Western governments have not once spoken in the United Nations Terrorist Council about their "Right 2 Protect" the Irani people from the oppression and continued murder by the mullahs. Unlike for the Libyan Jamahiriya in 2011 the Western governments / NATO and the Sunni GCC are not sending a 30+ government military alliance plus thousands of Al Qaeda and so-called Muslim Brotherhood to Iran ruled by Shia mullahs to overthrow the mullahs i.e. do regime change and install a new government. NATO wants the Irani mullahs to stay. Doesn't matter if 1000 more Iranis are murdered by the mullah regime.

Skirt size= freedom according to some ligandus on this forum no wonder the quality of posts and threads has gone down, PDF had a great run.

For a month or so I have found you contradictory. You were the one posting Punjabi poetry in the status boxes. But now you are a mullah. Also, gaandus are not liberals generally but the mullah bois. :)

And you want to know when PDF had a great run ? Read this thread of mine.
 
.
Everything else aside, Hijab by consensus is mandatory in Islam. Covering the hair is something mentioned in the Quran for women. Burning hijab is rebelling against the Quran. Rejecting the verses of the Quran is an act of KUFR.
 
.
Everything else aside, Hijab by consensus is mandatory in Islam. Covering the hair is something mentioned in the Quran for women. Burning hijab is rebelling against the Quran. Rejecting the verses of the Quran is an act of KUFR.

In this context I see the Iranian women burning Hijab is not to rebel against Quran, but rebelling against their government hijab enforcement law.

It is clear in Quran that we cannot force any one to do any religious duties

1670195118651.png


I don't think Iran should go back to the Shah. That time has passed. Iran should become a secular constitutional republic like Turkey and move forward.


Absolutely. Tired of these two faced holier than thou crusty old men oppressing these hot Persian dime pieces.

FREE THE IRANIAN BABES FROM THE CLUTCHES OF THE MULLAHS!!!!

This should be a rallying call.

Persian women only wants to marry Muslim, I need to make it clear for you.....8-)

These two have already married recently

 
Last edited:
.
Everything else aside, Hijab by consensus is mandatory in Islam. Covering the hair is something mentioned in the Quran for women. Burning hijab is rebelling against the Quran. Rejecting the verses of the Quran is an act of KUFR.
I agree with this.

I do however think that it doesn’t need to be enforced by a morality police. I also don’t think that mullahs should be involved in anything in the executive or legislative branch. They should have a majority say in the judiciary though.

Iran, is a moderate, and educated country. I think there were some excesses committees under the idea of valiyahati faqih. I think the religious clergy ought to limit themselves to judicial role and let efficient competent institutions develop.

Even here, if the point is to attract people to islam, the current rules have been a failure of policy. This can only be corrected when legislative and executive roles are handled with pragmatism.
 
.
Then go back to Pakistan from "sinful" West and see if you can convince your family's females to depart with you to the glorious "I"EA where "sin" is prohibited but hunger, homelessness, disease and no development is joyfully halaal.



What "Iran culture" ? This ? You are imposing your own perverse mullah thoughts on Iranis, something that they rejected so vociferously :
They chant "Marg bar dictator", call for overthrow of Mullah Khamenei and his mullah regime and its milita Basij and IRGC and all that whom all you are shilling for here. Are you being more Irani than the Iranis ?

Did you know that your Mullah Khomenei, the spiritual leader of the fake Islamic revolution of 1979, was sitting comfortably in Paris under the asylum of the French NATO government and that most of the agitation against the shah was done by the Irani leftists including Communists ? And after that job had been done NATO sent in Mullah Khomenei to Tehran to take over the country because a mullah is what NATO wanted instead of those "abhorrent" commies governing Iran. Can't have another country in the Eastern Bloc. So Khomenei grandly stepped off the flight from Paris in 1979 and imposed the hijab among other things and waged war against Socialist Iraq including having sent brainwashed or unwilling adolescent boys across minefields so that the mines burst and the drafted military gets to go across and the pre-teen boys get to go to heaven.



Western governments have not once spoken in the United Nations Terrorist Council about their "Right 2 Protect" the Irani people from the oppression and continued murder by the mullahs. Unlike for the Libyan Jamahiriya in 2011 the Western governments / NATO and the Sunni GCC are not sending a 30+ government military alliance plus thousands of Al Qaeda and so-called Muslim Brotherhood to Iran ruled by Shia mullahs to overthrow the mullahs i.e. do regime change and install a new government. NATO wants the Irani mullahs to stay. Doesn't matter if 1000 more Iranis are murdered by the mullah regime.



For a month or so I have found you contradictory. You were the one posting Punjabi poetry in the status boxes. But now you are a mullah. Also, gaandus are not liberals generally but the mullah bois. :)

And you want to know when PDF had a great run ? Read this thread of mine.
calm down boy, go drink some Pepsi.
 
.
In this context I see the Iranian women burning Hijab is not to rebel against Quran, but rebelling against their government hijab enforcement law.

It is clear in Quran that we cannot force any one to do any religious duties

1670195118651.png

But Hijab is mandatory in Islam so burning it would be burning a symbol of Islam since it’s mandatory in Islam. They could have found other ways to protest if they wanted to protest. I see this as rebelling against the Quran because it’s a sin no matter what and promoting the sin and burning a symbol of Islam just proves their rebelling against the verses of the Quran. Other people might interpret their actions differently but why would someone even do something like this which is act of kufr to some or borderline kufr to others?
Also, my argument is solely with the focus of hijab being burnt and the status of hijab in Islam (it being mandatory). For anything else my opinion or interpretation is something I’d like to keep to my self.
 
.

About goddamn time. What an obnoxious presence in the daily life of Iranians which are an ever present irritant for most people.

Imo, Iran is actually one of the most secular countries in the Middle East. It shouldn’t be ruled by an *** backward religious government. It should be a secular republic like Turkey. If that was the case, the government would actually be more in line with their own population, who are very secular.
This is most likely fake news, I think they just changed it's name.
 
.
But Hijab is mandatory in Islam so burning it would be burning a symbol of Islam since it’s mandatory in Islam. They could have found other ways to protest if they wanted to protest. I see this as rebelling against the Quran because it’s a sin no matter what and promoting the sin and burning a symbol of Islam just proves their rebelling against the verses of the Quran. Other people might interpret their actions differently but why would someone even do something like this which is act of kufr to some or borderline kufr to others?
Also, my argument is solely with the focus of hijab being burnt and the status of hijab in Islam (it being mandatory). For anything else my opinion or interpretation is something I’d like to keep to my self.
"Plez prtest in a way dat wont hurt ma feelingz"
 
.
I agree with this.

I do however think that it doesn’t need to be enforced by a morality police. I also don’t think that mullahs should be involved in anything in the executive or legislative branch. They should have a majority say in the judiciary though.

Iran, is a moderate, and educated country. I think there were some excesses committees under the idea of valiyahati faqih. I think the religious clergy ought to limit themselves to judicial role and let efficient competent institutions develop.

Even here, if the point is to attract people to islam, the current rules have been a failure of policy. This can only be corrected when legislative and executive roles are handled with pragmatism.
Yeah people have their interpretation or opinion or whether it should be enforced or not.
However my post was solely about the status of hijab in Islam. Anything else I feel like it’s not appropriate to discuss on a public forum which is polluted by non Muslims trolls.
I do not support the crimes Iranian morality police did like the brutal extra judicial murder of that girl.

"Plez prtest in a way dat wont hurt ma feelingz"
I don’t care about feeling. You should care about your actions tho. Just a simple action like that can throw you out the fold of Islam.
Have fun on the day of judgement then.
 
.
But Hijab is mandatory in Islam so burning it would be burning a symbol of Islam since it’s mandatory in Islam. They could have found other ways to protest if they wanted to protest. I see this as rebelling against the Quran because it’s a sin no matter what and promoting the sin and burning a symbol of Islam just proves their rebelling against the verses of the Quran. Other people might interpret their actions differently but why would someone even do something like this which is act of kufr to some or borderline kufr to others?
Also, my argument is solely with the focus of hijab being burnt and the status of hijab in Islam (it being mandatory). For anything else my opinion or interpretation is something I’d like to keep to my self.

In Islam, the deeds is based on what is inside the heart, not the action itself. You can only blame her as Kufur if you know exactly what is inside the women heart who burn the hijab. Since you dont know, then you should not define the action as Kufur.

You have already created sin by saying her as Kafir, while we dont know what is exactly inside her heart. For me, by seeing the context, the women who burn hijab could possibly do that to oppose the regime or opposing the regime hijab enforcement law while she acknowledges that Hijab is mandatory for any adult women
 
.
This shows rhe protests have them worried. Mullah mouthpieces here were claiming there r no protests lolz. Frnakly if iran were to become more open and democratic, theu would really develop and gibe Europeans and Turks a run for their money.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom