Iran attack would last 48 hours

[Paan Singh]

shift to what ?

sift to other oil producing nations

 

[Harry Potter]

48 hours is too long,if US is involved,but in a fast paced war US will suffer upto 1,000 casualties.
But if the US is ready to prolong the conflict to 4-5 days US may win with less than 250 casualties.

 

[Sugarcane]

48 hours is too long,if US is involved,but in a fast paced war US will suffer upto 1,000 casualties.
But if the US is ready to prolong the conflict to 4-5 days US may win with less than 250 casualties.

Do you know actual figure of US+NATO casualties in Afghanistan War????

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]

48 hours is too long,if US is involved,but in a fast paced war US will suffer upto 1,000 casualties.
But if the US is ready to prolong the conflict to 4-5 days US may win with less than 250 casualties.

So tell me how did you figure that out?

 

[lem34]

Do you know actual figure of US+NATO casualties in Afghanistan War????

I think the casualties America will suffer are incalculable not only that but Israelis and Sauds I expect will suffer as well

 

[Sugarcane]

sift to other oil producing nations

The haven't asked Israelis to shift to other nations, So - I guess there will be no attack

 

[Harry Potter]

^Everyone was thinking the same thing before Gulf War & Iraqi freedom.
Look at Saddams airforce in 1990,it was the world's fourth largest at that time.The commanders had considerable experience due to Iran-Iraq war.
But in the end Iraq 35,000+ casualties & US 150 casualties.

 

[Sugarcane]

sift to other oil producing nations

How to change nickname

 

[Paan Singh]

How to change nickname

phone call to asim

but call rates are expensive,so be careful

20Rs per minute

 

[Cheetah786]

48 hours is too long,if US is involved,but in a fast paced war US will suffer upto 1,000 casualties.
But if the US is ready to prolong the conflict to 4-5 days US may win with less than 250 casualties.

Ladies and gentleman harry here was also adviser to George Bush.

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]

^Everyone was thinking the same thing before Gulf War & Iraqi freedom.
Look at Saddams airforce in 1990,it was the world's fourth largest at that time.The commanders had considerable experience due to Iran-Iraq war.
But in the end Iraq 35,000+ casualties & US 150 casualties.

First of all, sadam has the 4th largest military in terms on number.
I love it when some like you come and think that meant he has the 4th strongest armed forces or airforce.

 

[Tesla1000]

The war might take more than a month .Iran is not Libya or even Saddam's Iraq.And WTF only 1000 yankee casualties??!!! If they put troops on the ground(Iraq/Afg style) then more than 500000 us soldiers will go home in body bags.

 

[Cheetah786]

^Everyone was thinking the same thing before Gulf War & Iraqi freedom.
Look at Saddam's air force in 1990,it was the world's fourth largest at that time.The commanders had considerable experience due to Iran-Iraq war.
But in the end Iraq 35,000+ casualties & US 150 casualties.

Mr harry stick with hog wards and live in fantasy land here in real world what you are claiming is hogwash and pure BS.

 

[Harry Potter]

Instead of resorting to personal assault read this:
The Geo-Politics of the Strait of Hormuz: Could the U.S. Navy be defeated by Iran in the Persian Gulf?

Even the Pentagon’s own war simulations have shown that a war in the Persian Gulf with Iran would spell disaster for the United States and its military. One key example is the Millennium Challenge 2002 (MC02) war game in the Persian Gulf, which was conducted from July 24, 2002 to August 15, 2002 and took almost two years to prepare. This mammoth drill was amongst the largest and most expensive war games ever held by the Pentagon. Millennium Challenge 2002 was held shortly after the Pentagon had decided that it would continue the momentum of the war in Afghanistan by targeting Iraq, Somalia, Sudan, Libya, Lebanon, Syria, and finishing off with the big prize of Iran in a broad military campaign to ensure U.S. primacy in the new millennium.

After Millennium Challenge 2002 was finished, the war game was “officially” presented as a simulation of a war against Iraq under the rule of President Saddam Hussein, but in actuality these war games pertained to Iran.[5] The U.S. had already made assessments for the upcoming Anglo-American invasion of Iraq. Moreover, Iraq had no naval capabilities that would merit such large-scale use of the U.S. Navy.

Millennium Challenge 2002 was conducted to simulate a war with Iran, which was codenamed “Red” and referred to an unknown Middle Eastern rogue enemy state in the Persian Gulf. Other than Iran, no other country could meet the perimeters and characteristics of “Red” and its military forces, from the patrol boats to the motorcycle units. The war simulation took place because Washington was planning on attacking Iran soon after invading Iraq in 2003.

The scenario in the 2002 war game started with the U.S., codenamed “Blue,” giving Iran a one-day ultimatum to surrender in the year 2007. The war game’s date of 2007 would chronologically correspond to U.S. plans to attack Iran after the Israeli attack on Lebanon in 2006, which was to extend, according to military plans, into a broader war against Syria. The war against Lebanon, however, did not go as planned and the U.S. and Israel realized that if Hezbollah could challenge them in Lebanon then an expanded war with Syria and Iran would be a disaster.

In Millennium Challenge 2002’s war scenario, Iran would react to U.S. aggression by launching a massive barrage of missiles that would overwhelm the U.S. and destroy sixteen U.S. naval vessels – an aircraft carrier, ten cruisers, and five amphibious ships. It is estimated that if this had happened in real war theatre context, more than 20,000 U.S. servicemen would have been killed in the first day following the attack. [6]

The Geo-Politics of the Strait of Hormuz: Could the U.S. Navy be defeated by Iran in the Persian Gulf?

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]