I talk about ethnicity, I dont talk about languages.
"Jew" is a ethnicity, it's not a language.
Persian is a ethnicity and is a language, but I use both terms in the same sentence it's clear than I'm talking about ethnicity. $
As shown by recent genetic studies, there's in essence only one main so-called "ethnicity" in Iran since all these groups overlap.
Moreover there's no way of determining an Iranian's so-called "ethnicity", it is not written down, not filed anywhere. And it would be quite an impossible task, given that the majority of Iranians descend from ancestors of not one but several so-called "ethnicities".
Any rambling about "Persians and Kurds", "Persians and Azaris" is inoperative from the outset, given the strong "ethno"-linguistic inter-mixedness of Iranians.
Average income of non-Jewish ethnicity in Israel is higher than average income of non-Persian ethnicity in Iran.
It's also higher than the average income of native Persian-speakers. Due to the current exchange rate of the Iranian currency.
There's no discrimination along "ethno"-linguistic lines in Islamic Iran, whereas the zionist entity is an "ethno"-supremacist apartheid regime applying differentiated treatment of citizens depending on their backgrounds.
And I'm talking about the average, I'm not talking about ONE person, the supreme leader.
It says everything one needs to know about the Islamic Republic: a system which does not discriminate on "ethno"-linguistic bases.
In Occupied Palestine, an Arab will never be allowed to be prime minister. In Iran anyone can be Supreme Leader regardless of their so-called "ethnicity".
So if there is some apartheid state, it's more apartheid Iran than Israel.
Native speakers of non-Persian idioms are often better off economically than native Persian speakers. The provinces of Yazd and Kerman for instance, home to native Persian-speakers, have inferior GDP's in comparison to several provinces inhabited mostly by native non-Persian speakers. Furthermore geographical GDP variations do not necessarily point to discrimination. They are a natural feature of development. Problem arises only when there is deliberate unfavorable treatment, either on the societal basis or worse, in law.
Both these forms of inequality are rife in Occupied Palestine, but they do not exist in Islamic Iran. In Iran, a person applying for a job is never asked what supposed "ethnicity" they belong to. Nor is this mentioned in their ID papers. Nor is it clear from their names. Nor is it visible by their physical appearance. Nor is their place of birth a reliable indicator, since sub-national groups in Iran do not live segregated, they mix and intermarry, live in the same cities (over 70% of the Iranian population is urbanized).
That's why people in leadership positions in Iran originate from all possible so-called "ethno"-linguistic communities. Speaker of Majles (parliament), Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf is a Kurdish Iranian. So is the commander-in-chief of the Navy, Shahram Irani. The head of the national security, Ali Shamkhani, a native Arab-speaker. The Supreme Leader, Azari-speaker. A significant percentage of stores at the Tehran Grand Bazar are owned by Azaris (higher than their share of the population). Armenian Iranians and Jewish Iranians have above average levels of income. It's not "one person" at all, but across the whole board.
Iranians don't care about a compatriot's "ethno"-linguistic background. It's a non-issue. So to even compare Iran with Isra"el" in terms of "ethnic" discrimination would be comical.