What's new

Iran among top five drone technology owners

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
Begging how?... Everytime someone buys foreign equipment and weapons it is begging? I gues Iran Begged for those F-14s to? I gues they Begged for all there foreign equipment to, So how are you different then us...

well do you knew what's the meaning of Funding a project

From WordNet 2.0
fund

Noun
1. a reserve of money set aside for some purpose
(synonym) monetary fund
(hypernym) money
(hyponym) revolving fund
2. a supply of something available for future use; "he brought back a large store of Cuban cigars"
(synonym) store, stock
(hypernym) accumulation
(hyponym) infrastructure, base
3. a financial institution that sells shares to individuals and invests in securities issued by other companies
(synonym) investment company, investment trust, investment firm
(hypernym) nondepository financial institution
(hyponym) hedge fund, hedgefund
Verb
1. convert (short-term floating debt) into long-term debt that bears fixed interest and is represented by bonds
(hypernym) finance
2. place or store up in a fund for accumulation
(hypernym) roll up, collect, accumulate, pile up, amass, compile, hoard
(derivation) monetary fund
3. provide a fund for the redemption of principal or payment of interest
(hypernym) supply, provide, render, furnish
(derivation) investment company, investment trust, investment firm
4. invest money in government securities
(hypernym) invest, put, commit, place
(derivation) investment company, investment trust, investment firm
5. accumulate a fund for the discharge of a recurrent liability; "fund a medical care plan"
(hypernym) roll up, collect, accumulate, pile up, amass, compile, hoard
6. furnish money for; "The government funds basic research in many areas"
(hypernym) support
(hyponym) grubstake
(entail) finance
(derivation) monetary fund
 
.
don't pretend you don't understand when you use American GPS, they can intercept your drone anytime.
and if your drones were so reliable you imagine, your military would use them instead of American MQ-9.
Stop making up sh1t. GPS signals are one-way.
 
. .
don't pretend you don't understand when you use American GPS, they can intercept your drone anytime.
and if your drones were so reliable you imagine, your military would use them instead of American MQ-9.

Mod Edit ...This must be a great achievement aswell for Iranians doesnt it?

well do you knew what's the meaning of Funding a project

And this relates to begging how? Nobody beside Turkey funded this project... And spare me your pathetic conpiracy theories, Your brainwashed with this mindset. Everything has an 'evil' agenda behind it, Everything bad is the foult of 'zionist!'.
 
.
Stop making up sh1t. GPS signals are one-way.
so Russia and China could use US GPS instead of developing their own?

OMG You just won the crown for the dummest comment in history! This must be a great achievement aswell for Iranians doesnt it?



And this relates to begging how? Nobody beside Turkey funded this project... And spare me your pathetic conpiracy theories, Your brainwashed with this mindset. Everything has an 'evil' agenda behind it, Everything bad is the foult of 'zionist!'.
Mod Edit

Turkey has Rented 4 MQ-9 UAVs against PKK terrorists.the question is why is that?please answer in a civil way.
 
.
so Russia and China could use US GPS instead of developing their own?


hey is here a stable?change this barbarian behaviour....

Turkey has Rented 4 MQ-9 UAVs against PKK terrorists.the question is why is that?please answer in a civil way.

Simple, Stop-gap.
 
. . .
so Russia and China could use US GPS instead of developing their own?
Yes.

The US GPS used to have what is called 'selective availability'...

GPS.gov: Selective Availability
Selective Availability (SA) was an intentional degradation of public GPS signals implemented for national security reasons.

In May 2000, at the direction of President Bill Clinton, the U.S government discontinued its use of Selective Availability in order to make GPS more responsive to civil and commercial users worldwide.

The United States has no intent to ever use Selective Availability again.

In September 2007, the U.S. government announced its decision to procure the future generation of GPS satellites, known as GPS III, without the SA feature. Doing this will make the policy decision of 2000 permanent and eliminate a source of uncertainty in GPS performance that had been of concern to civil GPS users worldwide.
What SA did was to degrade positional accuracy at our leisure. Not worldwide, just at the areas we want. A lot of people did not like that, even after we decided not to have that feature in later generation of GPS satellites...

Defense.gov News Release: DoD Permanently Discontinues Procurement Of Global Positioning System Selective Availability
September 18, 2007

This capability, known as Selective Availability (SA), will no longer be present in the next generation of GPS satellites.
First, we stop the use of SA in (then) existing satellites, then when we replaced those satellites, the new ones do not have that hardware feature built in.

The decisions by Russia, China, and Europe to develop their own satellite assist navigation are based on each national security interests.
 
.
...
First, we stop the use of SA in (then) existing satellites, then when we replaced those satellites, the new ones do not have that hardware feature built in.

The decisions by Russia, China, and Europe to develop their own satellite assist navigation are based on each national security interests.
even if all of the satellites were replaced by today, a simple software upgrade (not necessarily hardware) can bring back that feature, or simpler sending wrong time from ground stations.
the point is who trusts US and who wont.

anyway using satellite guidance, comes with jamming and spoofing risk. against an electronic warfare capable enemy, no better destiny than RQ-170.
 
. . .
Good job on what? This news is untrue. The only thing Iranians show is 3d concept pictures.

so what? why are you bothered ? you are neighbour of Iran and according to Iranian military plans Turkish interests are not included in the ''to target'' list. so tell me why you are bothered, you must be a zionist
 
.
so what? why are you bothered ? you are neighbour of Iran and according to Iranian military plans Turkish interests are not included in the ''to target'' list. so tell me why you are bothered, you must be a zionist

Iran is not a nice neighbor to have. If you remain longer on this forum you will understand. And no I'm not zionist. I'm somebody who doesn't believe in lies. Real muslims don't lie. Real muslims don't create sectarian conflict.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom