sparklingway
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 12, 2009
- Messages
- 3,878
- Reaction score
- 0
wow...nice discussion, can u tell me who is the best choice for next Prime Minister/President?
Dont say Imran Khan/Mustafa Kamal, coz u know they cant get enough votes from all part of countries, plz can u answer me in only one line, who's the best option for us in current position?
*Hint*: If u dont have money to get meal from 7-star hotel, then u can eat from some cheap hotel, rather eating nothing.
I did not discuss what can be termed as alternatives. This "if not him then whom" debate is an essential flaw in public discourse that always leads to hairbrained discussion that is never effective.
My point was to identify that there is no reason to support somebody without any coherent ideology and focus on personalities ruins political discourse and by suggesting IK/MK as alternatives you strengthened my point that individuals are far bigger than discourse in the public view.
This has, and continues to inflict our political culture. I am not discussing alternatives here. Open a new thread for that.
Sparky - I can resonate with the direction you're headed for
but find the road you take to arrive rather foggy.
I think you should be addressing Governance and its modalities
that will lead you there.
On second thought you should have remained the Think Tank
you were, Mod is rather distracting for you.
Sprinkle a little sparkle.
I did not want to turn this thread into a statistical fist fight and wanted to show that "support X because he is awesome" is flawed and this cult of personality afflicts the self-righteous, pathetic and obnoxious "educated" elite equally, if not more, than the average populace. If these self styled moralists and elitist "educated" people cannot overcome the cult of personality and have no rational debate over political ideologies, socio-economic models, goals and practical paths to goals, then they have no moral and ethical justification to label themselves as the true saviours of this country.