INTERVIEW: EX-PAKISTANI DICTATOR MUSHARRAF MULLED USING NUKES AGAINST INDIA AFTER 2001 ATTACK

[ito]

Judging by the side effects of nuclear, both Pakistan and India would have been loser with mostly India the most given the size of population.

Whereas for Pakistan, future Muslims from the rest of the world would be newer inhabitants of Pakistan so Islam can carry on since Pakistan is created to protect Islam in subcontinent from India hence the 2-nations-theory.

So you launch a nuclear attack on India ...and want India to keep quite???

Yes...both would be looser.....but more people on Pakistan side will die...as 85% of you population reside 100 Km from the border and most in Punjab and Sindh, while Indian population is spread uniformly from Gujarat to Nagaland and from Kashmir to Kerala...but there is consolation prize for India, India would gain substantial chunk of Pakistani territory.

 

[Sipahi]

So you launch a nuclear attack on India ...and want India to keep quite???

Yes...both would be looser.....but more people on Pakistan side will die...as 85% of you population reside 100 Km from the border and most in Punjab and Sindh, while Indian population is spread uniformly from Gujarat to Nagaland and from Kashmir to Kerala...but there is consolation prize for India, India would gain the substantial chunk of Pakistani territory.

So you want to make us all believe that Pakistan will be firing nukes in less populated areas of India and at the same time India will be targeting more populated areas of Pakistan

Abey jb marna hua tou aik q marain gey ... pooore 110 aik saaaath marain gey aur phir aage jo hoga dekh bhi lain gey

 

[Finer]

So you launch a nuclear attack on India ...and want India to keep quite???

Yes...both would be looser.....but more people on Pakistan side will die...as 85% of you population reside 100 Km from the border and most in Punjab and Sindh, while Indian population is spread uniformly from Gujarat to Nagaland and from Kashmir to Kerala...but there is consolation prize for India, India would gain the substantial chunk of Pakistani territory.

Precisely why both Pakistan and India won't launch Nuclear war among each other as Nuclear proved to be deterrent which was sight for change given the history.

And stupid assumption on the geographical and population given the fact that Nuclear is far too damaging to ignore since Pakistan is small nation with small population while India is big nation with big population is likely to lose the most in term of geographically and population-wise.

There is no winner here, however, India has more to lose because of geographical and population-wise which cannot be disputed since it is based on the factual ground. In short, both small Pakistan and big India will be destroyed with India losing the most because India is big billion-populated nation.

 

[El Sidd]

shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

I wanna say something but shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

 

[Musafir117]

It's not about size of country it's about who strike first and striker gain a lot as the points of target to destroy brain and if brain goes down be 500 ponds or 100 ponds body fall down. It was a good decision by Mushraff to control his passions.

 

[Laozi]

Pervez Musharraf Considered Using Nukes Against India In 2002: Report

At the time, Musharraf had publicly said that he would not rule out possibility of using nuclear weapons.

Dubai: Pakistan's former military dictator Gen Pervez Musharraf says he considered the use of nuclear weapons against India amid tensions following the 2001 terror attack on the Indian Parliament, but decided against doing so out of fear of retaliation, according to a media report.
Musharraf, 73, also recalled that he had many sleepless nights, asking himself whether he would or could deploy nuclear weapons, the Japanese daily 'Mainichi Shimbun' said.

The former president disclosed that amid tensions between India and Pakistan following the 2001 terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament, he contemplated the use of nuclear weapons, but decided against doing so out of fear of retaliation.

When tensions were high in 2002, there was a "danger when (the) nuclear threshold could have been crossed," the paper quoted Musharraf as saying.

At the time, Musharraf had publicly said that he would not rule out the possibility of using nuclear weapons.

Musharraf also said, however, that at the time, neither India nor Pakistan had nuclear warheads on their missiles, so it would have taken one to two days to make them launch-ready.


Asked whether he had ordered that missiles be equipped with nuclear warheads and put into firing position, he said, "We didn't do that and we don't think India also did that, thank God" -- pointing, perhaps, to a fear of retaliation, the paper reported.
The two countries subsequently avoided an all-out clash and tensions subsided.

The then army chief Musharraf ousted the then Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in a coup in October 1999. The army general served as president from 2001 to 2008.

Musharraf has been living in Dubai since last year when he was allowed to leave Pakistan on pretext of medical treatment. He has been charged with involvement in the murder of the former two-time prime minister Benazir Bhutto in 2007.

http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/perv...ng-nukes-against-india-in-2002-report-1729921

 

[el nino]

EASY FOR HIM to say this ....... BECAUSE the first plane out of PAKISTAN diuring a fullscale war will have on on board MUSHRAFF wife & Children and other next of kin. 100% guranteed straight to DUBAI

WHY ,,,,,,,,,, bcause he will not wish his loved ones to sitting in Lahore Kracjhi Rawlpindi or Multan AFTER Pakistan fires a NUKE

LIKE I SAID I will rate him if his family was NOT SITTING IN UK or DUBAI

 

[BATMAN]

Musharraf is a forgiving person and this is his weakness.
He should have acted, without giving Indian army chief an opportunity to call for US help.

 

[El Sidd]

Lol

He got the year wrong on purpose

 

[YeBeWarned]

its good he didn't or else billion people will be crisp and roasted ..

 

[sohail.ishaque]

Good that better sense prevailed by Musaraf. Or Pakistan would have been a big looser in the end.

and India ? a Winner ?????

 

[EndangeredSpecies]

and India ? a Winner ?????

Thats an old bromide...
There are no winners in a nuclear war.

 

[abrar khan]

Pakistan would have been a big looser in the end

You have Nukes and we have crackers? It would be a MAD scenario no winner both looser. Better to avoid war.

 

[Gurjot.S]

This commando musharaf ran away from pakistan because of some case against him ?

 

[abrar khan]

View attachment 414182

Hindian delusion, your wet dreams .. like sur g kal strike.

a
[UOTE="ito, post: 9707800, member: 157605"]So you launch a nuclear attack on India ...and want India to keep quite???

Yes...both would be looser.....but more people on Pakistan side will die...as 85% of you population reside 100 Km from the border and most in Punjab and Sindh, while Indian population is spread uniformly from Gujarat to Nagaland and from Kashmir to Kerala...but there is consolation prize for India, India would gain substantial chunk of Pakistani territory.[/QUOTE]
again I say your wet dreams