Intel launches next-gen processors, developed and designed in Israel

Hack-Hook · Jan 5, 2017

500 said:
Skylake was also developed in Israel. Every time new generation of Intel processors is coming out some say it is dissapontment coz it gives only 5% growth.

it's not important that it's designed in Israel, USA or Mars .
its not disappointment because it only added 5% . the problem is its hot, power hungry and inefficient . nobody said such about skylake but kabylake won't gave you much the only interesting part about it is native support for USB 3.1 and Type C connection.
and wont forget it must compete with AMD Zen Architecture

it seems Intel is up to its old game at Pentium era and this time AMD pull out another Athlon X64 .
now I wonder if Intel will again play the old game of bribing the manufacturer not to use AMD CPUs

500 · Jan 5, 2017

JEskandari said:
it's not important that it's designed in Israel, USA or Mars .
its not disappointment because it only added 5% . the problem is its hot, power hungry and inefficient .

What you are talking?

A direct comparison across four scenes with different loads shows that the new CPU generation’s power consumption is significantly lower at the same performance level compared to the previous generation. This difference gets larger under more intensive workloads.

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/intel...i7-7700-i5-7600k-i5-7600,review-33752-10.html

And Skylake was most power efficient x86 CPU before Kaby Lake.

Hack-Hook · Jan 6, 2017

500 said:
What you are talking?

A direct comparison across four scenes with different loads shows that the new CPU generation’s power consumption is significantly lower at the same performance level compared to the previous generation. This difference gets larger under more intensive workloads.

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/intel...i7-7700-i5-7600k-i5-7600,review-33752-10.html

And Skylake was most power efficient x86 CPU before Kaby Lake.

Are you kidding me you compare overclocked skylake with vanilla kabylake ? are you aware that skylake frequency is 3.5ghz but they overclocked it to 4.2ghz and compared it to a kabylake 7600 at the vanilla frequency of 3.8ghz. honestly won't you really know how much power consumption increase by overclocking.
its their power usage when none are overclocked

by the way its from the same article

This is likely due to Intel’s improved manufacturing process, which allows the new chips to operate at much lower voltages. Results from our sensors would seem to validate this theory. Then again, there’s a question mark as well. The comparison between Intel's Core i7-7700K and Core i7-6700K at the same frequency showed the latter exhibiting lower overall power consumption in spite of its higher Vcore.

By the way the same site have another slide that compare 7700k with 6700k at 4.5GHZ

you see it won't fair good at all

500 · Jan 6, 2017

JEskandari said:
Are you kidding me you compare overclocked skylake with vanilla kabylake ? are you aware that skylake frequency is 3.5ghz but they overclocked it to 4.2ghz and compared it to a kabylake 7600 at the vanilla frequency of 3.8ghz. honestly won't you really know how much power consumption increase by overclocking.
its their power usage when none are overclocked

4.2 is native turbo frequency of Kabylake. So on my chart both processors were working at same 4.2 GHz frequency.

A direct comparison across four scenes with different loads shows that the new CPU generation’s power consumption is significantly lower at the same performance level compared to the previous generation. This difference gets larger under more intensive workloads.

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/intel...i7-7700-i5-7600k-i5-7600,review-33752-10.html

Thus Kabylake is more power effective than Skylake, which was most power effective x86 CPU before Kabylake.

by the way its from the same article

By the way the same site have another slide that compare 7700k with 6700k at 4.5GHZ

you see it won't fair good at all

Here from that article:

Consequently, we end up comparing a solid Skylake CPU to a bad Kaby Lake sample at the same clock rate.

So even bad Kaby Lake sample shows 3.6% advantage in desktop mode and only 0.6% disatvantage in gaming load over Skylake, which is super effective CPU.

Hack-Hook · Jan 6, 2017

500 said:
4.2 is native turbo frequency of Kabylake. So on my chart both processors were working at same 4.2 GHz frequency.

A direct comparison across four scenes with different loads shows that the new CPU generation’s power consumption is significantly lower at the same performance level compared to the previous generation. This difference gets larger under more intensive workloads.

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/intel...i7-7700-i5-7600k-i5-7600,review-33752-10.html

Thus Kabylake is more power effective than Skylake, which was most power effective x86 CPU before Kabylake.

Here from that article:

Consequently, we end up comparing a solid Skylake CPU to a bad Kaby Lake sample at the same clock rate.

So even bad Kaby Lake sample shows 3.6% advantage in desktop mode and only 0.6% disatvantage in gaming load over Skylake, which is super effective CPU.

you don't get it you overclock an skylake up to 4.2ghz unless you disable turbo at bios it go up to 4.6ghz at turbo.
by the way there is no bad cpu read the article completely specially when they talk about comparing 30 cpu and reach the same conclusion .
and i posted performance levels in previous pages and you can go and look at them .

500 · Jan 6, 2017

JEskandari said:
you don't get it you overclock an skylake up to 4.2ghz unless you disable turbo at bios it go up to 4.6ghz at turbo.
by the way there is no bad cpu read the article completely specially when they talk about comparing 30 cpu and reach the same conclusion .
and i posted performance levels in previous pages and you can go and look at them .

On this chart both Skylake and Kabylake worked at same 4.2 GHz frequency:

Hack-Hook · Jan 7, 2017

500 said:
On this chart both Skylake and Kabylake worked at same 4.2 GHz frequency:

well as far as I'm concerned the frequency is not important .its the performance that is important remember intel speed game at the time of Pentium and Athlon 64.and no they were not working both working @4.2ghz maybe in desktop mode they were working at that frequency . but by definition turbo mode wont guaranty 4.2GHZ for kabylake it will go up to 4.2ghz if there is power and thermal headroom. so for example in Intel power thermal utility the frequency was probably 3.9ghz or 4ghz and its the same in FPU Max Load
its what you get and what you actually can measure

and this is what support my claims

dani191 · Jul 17, 2017

INTEL LAUNCHES NEXT-GEN PROCESSORS, DEVELOPED AND DESIGNED IN ISRAEL
BYMICHAEL ZEFF

JANUARY 3, 2017 19:01

The 7th generation processors provide record-breaking performance rates and are the fastest, strongest processors available to the general public, as well as being energy-saving.

Intel Core i7 CPUs, also known as Kaby Lake. (photo credit:INTEL)

Intel announced on Tuesday the official launch of its full line of advanced seventh generation computer processors.

According to Intel’s Israel division, the majority of development and design for the new high-performance processors came from the company’s Haifa development center.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

“Today, many of Intel’s core products are being developed through Intel Israel’s development branch, specifically the sixth generation processors that were announced last year and the seventh generation that was just announced today,” Ran Sanderovitz, vice president and general manager of Intel Israel’s development centers, told The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday.

According to Sanderovitz, employees at the center in Haifa, and in Yakum north of Tel Aviv, are behind many of the improvements to the 7th generation processors, with support from the firm’s communications platforms in Petah Tikva and Jerusalem.

More recommendations for you

Recommended by

“Of course, we work collaboratively with other international teams. Nothing you do is 100% local, but I would say that the majority of the design and the innovation – the big core improvements in physical design, architecture, built-in hardware security and device connectivity – were driven from our development center here,” he said.

“The ability to improve the existing performance rates of the processors was a very innovative task and was driven from Israel and done by the Intel Israel team. This is one of the best, if not the best, processor team in the world today.

I think it’s a result of chutzpah and the audacity to dare stretch the limits of capability. This is also what makes companies like Intel invest in Israel,” Sanderovitz said.

According to Intel’s announcement, the new processors provide record-breaking performance rates and are the fastest, strongest processors available today for the general public, as well as being energy-saving.

“Every year our team manages to add more and more performance power to the processors. Every year we manage to improve computing power by an average of 10%. With this line, our Israel team broke the world record once more, by 12%,” said Sanderovitz.

Intel’s first batch of seventh generation processors already hit the markets in August 2016, with a line focused more on low-power, lightweight and portable devices better suited for private individual use. Tuesday’s announcement brings the full range of processors to consumers who are professionals who use the Intel-powered devices for work or art, and for enterprises which also require non-portable devices.

“Now our full portfolio of products is out there. With this launch we are addressing the high-performance needs of the enterprise market segment and those who have more specialized needs from their machines,” Sanderovitz said.

The new processors are also a boon for gamers and the gaming industry, he said, as well as for anyone who deals with virtual reality, as they were specifically designed with the gamers and the VR sector in mind.

“The Israel team is very much in tune with the public, and is inspired to excel by consumer needs.”

Hours before Intel officially announced the launch, Japan’s Toshiba Corporation announced that, as of this month, nine of Toshiba’s computer models will be updated with the new processors. Chinese computer manufacturer Lenovo made a similar announcement in December.

“This is probably the crown jewel of Israeli high-tech. Very few products that are designed in Israel generate so much value by consumers worldwide, considering how many people are getting devices with an Intel processor,” Sanderovitz said.
http://www.jpost.com/Business-and-I...ssors-developed-and-designed-in-Israel-477358