Dillinger
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2012
- Messages
- 6,103
- Reaction score
- 13
- Country
- Location
Refer post#13
Refer post#13
"MMS status update", things just keep getting better and better around here don't they?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Refer post#13
Refer post#13
@Guynextdoor2 : Fail.
here is one pic of Arihant.(not confirmed though,)
www.media2.intoday.in/indiatoday/images/stories//2013aug/ins-arihant_660_081013115237.jpg
it was on MMS facebook page ....
Hahahah....congress credibility has been ruthlessly exposed.
This Guynextdoor fellow, what does he mean showing us a picture of Ohio and calling it Arihant,
and lol sexy!!!!
Warewah yeh toh pakka congress maal hai. Did Rahul Gandhi take that picture sir??
I know, so it's a fail for whoever runs/manages that page.
We know that they are clear they won't release the pic. So I guess the idea of using some pic off the internet is a deliberate decision.
We know that they are clear they won't release the pic. So I guess the idea of using some pic off the internet is a deliberate decision.
Oh please. When you made this thread, you were completely duped by that page, and you thought that it was INS arihant. That is why you titled the thread as a "sexy new pic". If you knew it was an old pic of an American submarine, you would not have made this thread or titled it so.
So cut this crap of "we know that..." You did not know. The person who manages that FB page tried to pass off an American submarine as INS arihant, and you fell for it, hook, line and sinker.
A FB page that purports to be the prime minister's should have more knowledgeable people managing it. If it was a deliberate decision, it should have been made clear on the FB page, that the pic is only for illustrative purposes.
Ya, use a pic off the net which a 21 year old amateur could spot as a fake and even point out the naval yard in the fuckin# background. Then put that pic on a public page accessed by god knows how many people so that an esteemed office of the nation, which the page claims to represent, is made to look juvenile and at par with North Korean photoshoppers. A brilliant decision- and then have someone put a spin on it to make it look like some form of clever misdirection. Words cannot describe how badly I want to throttle you and the person responsible for this pic.
'course I did, when did I deny that? But you also gotta agree...they haven't let any official pictures for some 4 years now? You can't deny that their policy of keeping the sub visuals under wraps has been largely successful.
Who are you again?