What's new

Indonesia's PT PAL Shipyard Won Contract for Philippines Navy MRV ships.

nufix

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Nov 5, 2012
Messages
2,062
Reaction score
5
Country
Indonesia
Location
Germany
Indonesian firm bags P4-b Navy supply deal
By Florante S. Solmerin | Posted on Aug. 30, 2013 at 12:01am |

KRI+Makassar+590+KRI+Surabaya+591.jpeg

Indonesian navy's Makassar class LPD, similar class ship will be built for Philippines Navy

The Department of National Defense on Thursday declared an Indonesia company as winner of a P4-billion contract to build two multi-role vessels for the Philippine Navy.

The Bids and Awards Committee chaired by Efren Fernandez, Assistant Secretary for Personnel, said that PT PAL Indonesia (Persero) was the “lone eligible bidder” with a bid price offer of P3,863,999,520.

The ship is designed to transport a battalion or 500 soldiers as well as logistics. It must be equipped with a helipad and medical facility for disaster response, according to documents obtained by the Manila Standard Today.

Other firms that bought bid documents include a joint venture between Astartez Defense and Rescue Solution Co. and Coastal Industries PTE. LTD.; PROPMECH Corporation; Daewoo International Corp. (Daesun – Republic of Korea); Larsen and Toubro (India); Stone of David Tactical Equipment Co.; STX Off-Shore Shipbuilding Co. (Korea); Keppel Philippines Marine, Inc.; and PT Citra Shipyard.

Except for STX and Citra, all the rest were present during the opening of bidding documents but did not submit their bid envelop, giving only PT PAL and Daesun the chance to vie for the bidding.

The BAC did not say why the other bidders withdrew.

Indonesian firm bags P4-b Navy supply deal - Manila Standard Today
 
.
Really i have to go to my sources about this thanks and just to add

Air Force chief: 12 fighter jets by 2016

If everything goes as planned, the Air Force may be able to receive two lead in fighter trainer jets as early as next year, a ranking military official said Wednesday.

Air Force chief Lt. Gen. Lauro Catalino dela Cruz said the first two air assets to be acquired from South Korea would be used to train their pilots.

“Our target date is [to] have at least two [jets delivered] initially by the end of fourth quarter of 2014 and then the rest would be (delivered in the next) six months,” dela Cruz said during a forum organized by the Manila Overseas Press Club last Monday.

The government plans to acquire 12 FA-50 jets for P18.9 billion to enhance the territorial defense capabilities of the Air Force.

Dela Cruz said the negotiations with the Korea Aerospace Industries started about a month ago. He said the two jets could be delivered by the end of 2014 if all the contracts and other necessary documents are signed this year.

“(Once the jets are delivered), we now have aircraft that could deter any intruder. If there are unidentified (intruders), we can pursue them,” dela Cruz told The STAR in a separate interview.

After the initial delivery, two jets are expected to arrive every two months. The delivery of all the 12 air assets may be completed before the Aquino administration steps down in 2016.

Earlier, The STAR reported that the Defense department’s Bids and Awards Committee had approved the terms of reference for the acquisition of the jets.

The Air Force also plans to acquire 21 UH-1 or Huey helicopters for P1.26 billion. The third bidding for the helicopters has been slated for this month.

The Defense department conducted two biddings for the project last December and February, but both of them failed.

The bidding is open to both local and foreign firms subject to eligibility conditions prescribed by the law.

Defense Undersecretary Fernando Manalo previously told The STAR that at least 14 firms have expressed interest to supply the Huey helicopters.

The government is also in the process of buying two Navy frigates, two strategic sealift vessels and six units of 155 mm Howitzer artilleries.

And other

Philippine Government awarded $18 Million Dollars contract to a US company for SE-Asia’s first DTRA Border Security

Raytheon Company (RTN ) has clinched a Defense Threat Reduction Agency or DTRA contract for maritime border security in the Philippines. This marks the first border security-related contract from Southeast Asia.


Raytheon has worked with the DTRA − a U.S. Department of Defense unit for interdicting the movement of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) − on cooperative threat reduction operations under a number of contracts.

Per the two-year base contract, Raytheon is responsible for designing and developing a National Coast Watch Center (NCWC), thereby integrating data from various agencies into the NCWC. The company will also install and provide training on an automatic identification system as well as radio communications for the government of the Philippines.

Philippine National Coast Watch Center (NCWC) was created in September 2011 under Executive Order 57 signed by the President Aquino, which calls for the establishment of a National Coast Watch Center headed by the Philippine Coast Guard to implement and coordinate maritime security operations in the country.

Raytheon Company through the 2 year base $18 Million US Dollars contract will develop and equip with state of the art Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance technology for the newly created National Coast Watch Center of the Philippines to detect territorial intrusions.

Under the two-year base contract, Raytheon will develop, design and construct the existing National Coast Watch Center (NCWC); support integration of data from various agencies into the NCWC; and provide acquisition, installation and training on an automatic identification system as well as radio communications for the Government of the Philippines. The contract was awarded July 2013, and will end July 31, 2015.

“The Philippines contract extends Raytheon’s border security solutions portfolio to Southeast Asia and confirms that our integration solutions, program management leadership and international expertise are valuable as we expand our support of customers around the world,” said David Appel, director of Surveillance, Range, and Infrastructure Solutions for Raytheon’s Intelligence, Information and Services business.

“With this contract, Raytheon continues its role in providing critical services and solutions to help other countries deter, detect and interdict illicit weapons and materials that could harm their citizens.”

Raytheon has performed similar work for DTRA under other contracts as well. The CTR Integrating Contract (CTRIC II), awarded in April 2011, is a multiple award indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contract, and the Philippines project is part of CTRIC II.

In April, Raytheon won a three-year, $35.9 million DTRA border security agreement. Per the agreement, Raytheon is responsible for designing, developing and implementing an integrated surveillance system along sections of the Jordanian border. The company will also provide training, maintenance and repair, as well as equipment. In fact, the Jordan venture is a part of the CTR Integrating Contract (CTRIC II), from Apr 2011, in this field.

Based in Waltham, Mass., Raytheon Company is a technology and innovation leader specializing in defense, homeland security and other government markets throughout the world. Going forward, revenue and earnings growth would continue to be driven by its strong presence in the areas of Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR); air & missile defense systems; border security; air traffic management; training and homeland security; and cyber security. The company remains actively involved in a number of classified U.S. government programs, principally through its IIS and SAS business segments.

Among the large-cap defense players, Raytheon is one of the best-positioned companies. Late last month, the company reported its second quarter 2013 earnings that exceeded our expectation by 26.1% and were also above the year-ago profit level by 4.5%. The beat was driven by strong program execution and the ability of the company to match the security needs of its customers through premium quality products.

State-of-the-art technology and missiles developed by the company allow it to have a competitive edge and ensure a continuous flow of contracts from the U.S. defense department and from its global customers.

Wow the good news just keeps coming Mabuhay ng Republika
 
.
i wish those contract can be realized very soon, just don't waste the time
 
.
Really i have to go to my sources about this thanks and just to add
...

Here is the source you seeked...
I couldn't post a link...
it is in manilastandardtoday *** com /2013/08/30/indonesian-firm-bags-p4-b-navy-supply-deal/
concatenate without spaces...
 
.
Thanks but its fine i just confirm with my colleges its true and the solo bidder too but it would be a long wait
 
.
I don't think Indonesian ships are worth buying. Like, they use foreign weapons and electronics. Plus, can they make stealthy ships?

I prefer ships from South Korea and China. I think the Incheon class frigate was a better choice than this.
 
.
I don't think Indonesian ships are worth buying. Like, they use foreign weapons and electronics. Plus, can they make stealthy ships?

I prefer ships from South Korea and China. I think the Incheon class frigate was a better choice than this.

There's no such thing like a 100% made in a certain country mlitary product, there must be parts that should be imported or jointly produced under license. For instance, Korean Incheon class frigate uses 5"/54 caliber Mark 45 gun which is a U.S produced naval gun and electrically equipped with Samsung Thales electronics which much of its components are provided by Thales. The same goes for Chinese made ships too, the infamous 100 mm naval gun fitted on Type 054A is derived from French GIAT 100 mm naval gun.

And before you rush for something like undermining things, try to read the news completely. This ship that the Phil will get is a MRV type ship, more like an auxiliary rather than a combatant ship. Comparing a support ship with ships of the line is like comparing your brain with Einstein's, they are both far from apple to apple comparison. One is built to transport and land tanks, helicopter, and troops and the other is built for direct battle.
 
.
There's no such thing like a 100% made in a certain country mlitary product, there must be parts that should be imported or jointly produced under license. For instance, Korean Incheon class frigate uses 5"/54 caliber Mark 45 gun which is a U.S produced naval gun and electrically equipped with Samsung Thales electronics which much of its components are provided by Thales. The same goes for Chinese made ships too, the infamous 100 mm naval gun fitted on Type 054A is derived from French GIAT 100 mm naval gun.

And before you rush for something like undermining things, try to read the news completely. This ship that the Phil will get is a MRV type ship, more like an auxiliary rather than a combatant ship. Comparing a support ship with ships of the line is like comparing your brain with Einstein's, they are both far from apple to apple comparison. One is built to transport and land tanks, helicopter, and troops and the other is built for direct battle.
So your saying that the ships are gonna be unarmed? Just use for logistics?
 
.
So your saying that the ships are gonna be unarmed? Just use for logistics?

This ship is not purely a logistic ship, it is a strategic sealift vessel, it can be involved in a battle in limited actions such as acting as the flag ship, command control, temporary rotored wing aircraft base, and amphibious landing.

The ship will be armed, but not for a head to head battle. The purpose of the weapons fitted on this kind of ship is mainly to defend the ship itself. That's why this kind of ship is always guarded by escort ships and always be placed in the centre of the formation, as in any battle, strategic ships like this will always be a main target for enemy.
 
.
4 billion pesos.... thats around $90 million.... thats very cheap for such a ship considering even chinese 071 is expensive although its twice as large at around 18-20k tonnes, compare to this which is 8.5k. IF PN ever went for amphibious ship this should be the first choice......
 
.
4 billion pesos.... thats around $90 million.... thats very cheap for such a ship considering even chinese 071 is expensive although its twice as large at around 18-20k tonnes, compare to this which is 8.5k. IF PN ever went for amphibious ship this should be the first choice......

Limited budget sir our 75 billion pesos around 1billion US has to be shared with the other service branches(Army,Airforce,Navy) and the constitution does not allow for military to have more budget than education,healthcare (thank the local commies in congress for that) its only 4.11% of the total budget of the government over 15% for loan payments and the rest Government service 27% so no choice wore one has just to work with that limited capability
 
.
The $90 million is just for the two hulls and propulsion machinery -- the weapons, sensors, and other key systems will be bidded and integrated separately. This is also (obviously) a separate contract than the frigates, which we will probably get from South Korea (though there are other bidders). These SSVs we're getting from Indonesia will be great for disaster relief, OFW evacuation, and other peaceful purposes.
 
.
There's no such thing like a 100% made in a certain country mlitary product, there must be parts that should be imported or jointly produced under license. For instance, Korean Incheon class frigate uses 5"/54 caliber Mark 45 gun which is a U.S produced naval gun and electrically equipped with Samsung Thales electronics which much of its components are provided by Thales. The same goes for Chinese made ships too, the infamous 100 mm naval gun fitted on Type 054A is derived from French GIAT 100 mm naval gun.

And before you rush for something like undermining things, try to read the news completely. This ship that the Phil will get is a MRV type ship, more like an auxiliary rather than a combatant ship. Comparing a support ship with ships of the line is like comparing your brain with Einstein's, they are both far from apple to apple comparison. One is built to transport and land tanks, helicopter, and troops and the other is built for direct battle.
That is China of early 2000s when our military development is still underdeveloped and thus the need to import foreign part. Today, China can indigenously manufactured most, if not all, weapons. Only three countries are capable of these feats, USA, China, and Russia.
 
.
That is China of early 2000s when our military development is still underdeveloped and thus the need to import foreign part. Today, China can indigenously manufactured most, if not all, weapons. Only three countries are capable of these feats, USA, China, and Russia.

I understand, but my point is, in nowaday's military industry, such 100% made in a certain country for a massive military product like Ship and aircraft is nearly impossible. China nowadays is sure capable of manufacturing its own weaponries, but also many of them are a developed version of another military product from other countries, I am not saying that is wrong, I am just showing my point that the development of military technologies in today's military industries using components 100% developed and made in a certain country is rare to be found, there will always be some parts that should be imported, or jointly developed under license, or reverse eingineered.
 
.
I understand, but my point is, in nowaday's military industry, such 100% made in a certain country for a massive military product like Ship and aircraft is nearly impossible. China nowadays is sure capable of manufacturing its own weaponries, but also many of them are a developed version of another military product from other countries, I am not saying that is wrong, I am just showing my point that the development of military technologies in today's military industries using components 100% developed and made in a certain country is rare to be found, there will always be some parts that should be imported, or jointly developed under license, or reverse eingineered.
Fair enough.

China makes a strategic move to have most, if not all, important military components to be indigenously made to prevent foreign weapon sanction in a potential war. I believe at the current level of Indonesia's weapon industry, certain component is still challenging to produce domestically, whether it is the weaknesses in technical expertise or cost concern. It is not to say Indonesia cannot improve on this at future time but I seriously doubt they will ever reach USA/Russia/China level of art craft simply because Indonesia does not have enough capital and the will. But I can be wrong.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom