What's new

Indonesia Defence Forum

Holy moly guacamole
32 f-16 thats big *** numbers
Its confirmed by our mod?
 
. .
late news::yay:

7 French Jet Fighter Conduct Emergency Landing at Sultan Iskandar Muda Airport, Aceh
:help:

the channel said: is it Rafale promotion?
Hmm...i don't think Rafale is of any interest at all for the Air Force, putting aside the pricetag, there's absolutely no benefit in buying Rafale over other options like additional F-16, Flankers or even future IFX acquisition, unless we are India-level happy spender.

Building an effective and solid Air Force is much more preferable than having a Khong Guan Air Force.
 
.
Hmm...i don't think Rafale is of any interest at all for the Air Force, putting aside the pricetag, there's absolutely no benefit in buying Rafale over other options like additional F-16, Flankers or even future IFX acquisition, unless we are India-level happy spender.

Building an effective and solid Air Force is much more preferable than having a Khong Guan Air Force.
Sorry if im lost but what is khong guan air force bro?
 
. . .
our society is much stronger compared to two decades ago, we are progressing

bravo for POLRI TNI to safeguard our people, country and democracy

905030459.jpg
54191315-1029346257250596-1951156005583016888-n-4f2ec10c2a9235e9546cc7107e04ac94.jpg
20190522011744-25512f98978de5605d18c0d6491f35dc.jpg
2019_05_22-14_06_52_839e08efeafee61674d878c0e22445d8_960x640_thumb.jpg
demo-21-mei-berlangsung-damai-massa-bagi-bagi-bunga-mawar-ke-polisi-L5xoqgaCfB.jpg
 
. . . .
. .
KRI Tombak-629 and KRI Halasan-630 at IMDEX Asia 2019. Credit to Komando Armada 1. The position of the missile box launchers on KRI Tombak-629 is still on its original position and imo was never removed.

View attachment 561964

Swipe for more pics:


Hmmm looking from the image the position for the CIWS kinda look wrong in a way, first is the RHIB hindered the fire arc for the CIWS and second is the placement is to low on the ground.
kcr-60-image01.jpg

the original design looks more logical and practical than the current one, clear POV for the CIWS there's not many clutter part on the ship hence lowered the RCS.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
.
Hmmm looking from the image the position for the CIWS kinda look wrong in a way, first is the RHIB hindered the fire arc for the CIWS and second is the placement is to low on the ground.
kcr-60-image01.jpg

the original design looks more logical and practical than the current one, clear POV for the CIWS there's not many clutter part on the ship hence lowered the RCS.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Actually that is not the original design but a CGI impression made by a Formil member.
 
.
Actually that is not the original design but a CGI impression made by a Formil member.
ah i wasn't aware of that.
but either way I still felt agitated by the placement, it looks like it was forced to fit a CIWS even tho it wasnt plan so :(

aacGY0tzB.jpg

not to scale at all but... it shows how much CIWS cover the ship
 
.
Back
Top Bottom