Nike
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2013
- Messages
- 13,867
- Reaction score
- 24
- Country
- Location
Honestly, we're better off lobbying for long-term acquisition for more Apaches or even possibly Chinooks rather than the A-10, as even US' high ranking officers hated them, they are so against CAS subsonic aircraft like the Warthog as they thought it is "obsolete" and very vulnerable to enemy's AA assets. The Warthog is planned to be replaced by F-35 (almost all older fighters/CAS in US inventory is planned will be replaced by F-35), but there's many debates regarding the decision and some even pushed to extend their service due to the A-10's popularity among ground troops.
I think the like of A-10 is better to stay above the ground and focus on hard ground targets pounding as a dedicated anti-vehicle/fortification CAS aircraft (presumably stationed at Sumatra or Batam), they have kinda limited range and flight characteristics not to mention they are subsonic and so far have no torpedo or AShM loadout, unsuitable for maritime operation, even CN-235 gunship or MPA with hardpoints for weapons is better suited for the job.
Maritime strike the best out there is Super hornet actually, especially the latest itterian they got more robust airframe (intended for harsh carrier operational) and longer range along with increased load out and much cheaper flying hours cost and life cycle compared to other double engine fighters, I prefer them over F 15 ex or SU 35 . Got them and pairing them with F 16 block 72+ viper along with growler variant with support of hawkeye or wedge tail you will get formidable Air Force fleets.
I still lamented the decision to keep the Flanker fleets and trying to adding them as they will became liability to our Air Force growth in near future as we are currently in transition to became network centric forces.
F 35, got issue as they will became harder for future upgrade program. As they all in built /close circle built from beginning and got issue for possible growth or upgrade. It is relatively good fighter but, in my opinion is better if we just fixed the ambition to build proper C4ISR capability by utilizing mature and much proven platforms with possible growth, ironically the teen series the US trying to discard and replace them with F35 are much more flexible than what they thought in the start of JSF program. For future fighter just keep with KFX/IFX, for lobby with Lockmart and US government , F16V deal is will be sufficient bargaining along with possible deals for AWACS, Tanker, large MPA/ASW.