A seriously flawed analysis -- That sovereign states such as India and Israel have the right to cooperate and further mutual interests is a given -- however, if they are in Afghanistan, as the author suggests, and they are, shouldn't the question be what the interests of US and NATO are with regard to Afghanistan, Central Asia and Pakistan? After all, the US runs the show in Afghanistan, doesn't it?
And if the "Islamicans" such TTP are agents of India and Israel and therefore by extension, US and NATO, why is it that the analysis does not deal with the issue in detail and instead suggests that the effort to "denuclearize" Pakistan is the real issue?
The entire disinformation campaign mounted by certain sections of Pakistan with regard to the issue of "denuclearize" Pakistan, is in reality an effort to divert attention away from the Islamicans such as the TTP, the Laskar of this and the Sepah of that.
Can Pakistan be "denuclearized"? Is that a reasonable question? Of course not, it's a canard, an effort to divert attention from the real problem which is the number of insurgencies that have ignited in Pakistan - primarily because the Pakistani state refuses to behave as a state, refuses to deliver services and has abdicated it's responsibility to protect it's citizens and their property -- is there money involved? is the pope catholic?
Of course the Indian and the Israeli is up to no good, but it's not about Pakistani nuclear weapons and be rest assured neither the Israeli nor the Indian is necessarily hostile to Pakistani interests - but like most all, it's not hard toimagine that they are having a hard time understanding just what thoe interests might be.
