sancho
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2009
- Messages
- 13,011
- Reaction score
- 27
- Country
- Location
it is not fair to say the IN is "wrong" or making a "mistake" in exploring foreign helos.
It is, unlike in the case of HTT 40, or even N-LCA that I often criticize, we already have a naval helicopter that could be useful for IN, the naval Dhruv! IN rejected one of the earlier versions and instead of asking for modifications or developing a re-design that is more suitable for their requirements, they now want 56 x foreign helicopter in the same class.
I agree that we neither can't wait for indigenous developments, nor take stuff that doesn't fit the requirements, but in this case we already have it and modifying it would take less time than setting up a competition and evaluating several foreign helicopters.
Wrt IMRH, that's not correct either, we are upgrading some of the Sea Kings and would need only a few medium class helicopter in the short term, especially since the LDPs and new carriers will not be available anytime soon either. So we could easily bridge the gap now and could go for a NG medium class helicopter in the long term. Same what I suggested with the heavy lift helicopter competition, where the CH 47 is a big mistake, which shows a lack of foresight of IAF. Mi 26-T2 now (in smaller numbers or even leased) and Eurocopters FTH in the long run, would have get is much more operational and industrial advantages and the same could come with a NG helicopter for the navy too.The IN particuarly does not have antoehr decade plus to wait for HAL to get around to building the IMRH. As it stands the IN's roatary wing issues will be addressed by 2018-20 and this is good for India.