What's new

India's Vikrant vs China's Fujian: Why Made-in-India aircraft carrier outshines Beijing's warship

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan

The Navies of India and China have received their new aircraft carriers in recent weeks. Beijing on June 17 launched its newest and most advanced aircraft carrier 'Fujian'. The 80,000 tonnes warship is equipped with an electromagnetic aircraft launch system. Only U.S's nuclear-powered Gerald Ford aircraft carrier is equipped with such advanced technology. However, Fujian is a conventional warship and experts warn that China may not be able to fully use the potential of EMALS technology. India on the other hand uses tried and tested STOBAR system on Vikrant. Watch this video to know more.


:omghaha: :omghaha::rofl::rofl::omghaha::rofl::cheesy::chilli::taz:
 
. .
This is like saying a J-8 is better than a F-22.

“The F-119 engines on the F-22 are capable of massive thrust and thrust vectoring, but experts say that they are very expensive to operate and maintain, use lots of fuel, and could contribute to aircraft crash if there is slight fault with FBW. Turbojet engines for the J-8 are a lot cheaper and perform well at high altitude.”

See what I did there?
 
Last edited:
.

The Navies of India and China have received their new aircraft carriers in recent weeks. Beijing on June 17 launched its newest and most advanced aircraft carrier 'Fujian'. The 80,000 tonnes warship is equipped with an electromagnetic aircraft launch system. Only U.S's nuclear-powered Gerald Ford aircraft carrier is equipped with such advanced technology. However, Fujian is a conventional warship and experts warn that China may not be able to fully use the potential of EMALS technology. India on the other hand uses tried and tested STOBAR system on Vikrant. Watch this video to know more.


:omghaha: :omghaha::rofl::rofl::omghaha::rofl::cheesy::chilli::taz:
Ja dafa ho hind.
Another galactic super duper carries.
Indian space ship
 
. .

The Navies of India and China have received their new aircraft carriers in recent weeks. Beijing on June 17 launched its newest and most advanced aircraft carrier 'Fujian'. The 80,000 tonnes warship is equipped with an electromagnetic aircraft launch system. Only U.S's nuclear-powered Gerald Ford aircraft carrier is equipped with such advanced technology. However, Fujian is a conventional warship and experts warn that China may not be able to fully use the potential of EMALS technology. India on the other hand uses tried and tested STOBAR system on Vikrant. Watch this video to know more.


:omghaha: :omghaha::rofl::rofl::omghaha::rofl::cheesy::chilli::taz:

Indians are a bunch of jokers.

Indian Navy is projected to dominate Indo Pacific region.

LOL India does not even control her immediate waters in Arabian Sea, Bay of Bengal and Indian Ocean but will dominate SCS and Pacific?
 
.
it is like claiming India space is better than China space technology despite Indian havent send a man to space, havent land a rover on moon and not even a single technology regards to building a space station.... lol.
 
.
it is like claiming India space is better than China space technology despite Indian havent send a man to space, havent land a rover on moon and not even a single technology regards to building a space station.... lol.
Stop getting uppity, its been 60 years since the first moon landing and you chinese are nowhere near landing a man on the moon, yet you compare yourself to the US 🤣
 
. .
The 82iq nature of Indians in full display,they think,they can scam their way into surpassing China with big talk.This low class nation is 5/6 x poorer than china for a reason, despite once starting from same point ,actually china was behind India in GDP in the 70s.

Stop getting uppity, its been 60 years since the first moon landing and you chinese are nowhere near landing a man on the moon, yet you compare yourself to the US 🤣

Why did you bring US suddenly out of nowhere? ? ?

what has US gotta do in India-china comparison?

you had to bring your perceived wyte colonial overlords since India itself is far behind china?

BTW China landed on the far side of the moon, US still has no capability to do so, currently.
 
Last edited:
.
The 82iq nature of Indians in full display,they think,they can scam their way into surpassing China with big talk.This low-class nation is 5/6 x poorer than china for a reason, despite once starting from same point ,actually china was behind India in GDP in the 70s.



Why did you bring US suddenly out of nowhere? ? ?

what has US gotta do in India-china comparison?

you had to bring your perceived wyte colonial overlords since India itself is far behind china?

BTW China landed on the far side of the moon, US still has no capability to do so, currently.
So you are saying their IQ suddenly increased after 1970? 🤣 Since as per you IQ is genetic, they should hve always had high iq for most of human history. So why were they behind till 1970?

There are only 2 possibilities. Either IQ means nothing, else high iq countries like China wouldnt have been dirt poor and fucked and slaughtered to pieces again and again for most of their history, by a few thousand low iq Mongol Barbarians 🤣, that too again and again, and then by the Japanese, and then by the amazing great leap forward where they killed 50 million of themselves. sorry such actions do not seem high iq to me.

Or the second possibilty is that IQ does mean something, but Chinese are not high iq

Pick and chose and let me know.
 
. .
Stop getting uppity, its been 60 years since the first moon landing and you chinese are nowhere near landing a man on the moon, yet you compare yourself to the US 🤣

Why are you bragging about the US's achievements? Its a well established fact that the Chinese Space Program is not far behind NASA and leagues ahead of India
 
.
So you are saying their IQ suddenly increased after 1970? 🤣 Since as per you IQ is genetic, they should hve always had high iq for most of human history. So why were they behind till 1970?

There are only 2 possibilities. Either IQ means nothing, else high iq countries like China wouldnt have been dirt poor and fucked and slaughtered to pieces again and again for most of their history, by a few thousand low iq Mongol Barbarians 🤣, that too again and again, and then by the Japanese, and then by the amazing great leap forward where they killed 50 million of themselves. sorry such actions do not seem high iq to me.

Or the second possibilty is that IQ does mean something, but Chinese are not high iq

Pick and chose and let me know.
When did I say iq was behind 1970?


China wouldnt have been dirt poor and fucked and slaughtered to pieces again and again for most of their history, by a few thousand low iq Mongol Barbarians 🤣, that too again and again, and then by the Japanese,
China was dirt poor during foreign invasion but they picked themselves up right after foreign invasion. Mongols aren't low lQ they have 20+ IQ than indian avg.

the amazing great leap forward where they killed 50 million of themselves.
You pulled 50 million from the estimate of 15-50 million death during the period of Great leap forward ,how convenient for your agenda,but if GLF was bad,India still had 5 years lower life expectancy than China in average, during the same period.
What does that say?
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom