Which country is good with dead lines?
As the complexity arise, there are chances of more failures. We blame drdo for lca
You guys are making excuses here! DRDO is not Indian defence industry as a whole, it is just one agency or company (how ever you want to call it) in our industry, so when we compare deadlines, we have to do it with comparable companies, that develops parts of new developments, not with the whole development!
Nobody is blaming DRDO for
LCA, because LCA as a fighter is developed by ADA and HAL as well. But the prime internal systems should have been done by DRDO (MMR and Kaveri K9), so if we blame DRDO, we blame them for their complete incompetence to estimate how their own capabilties were and how difficult it is to develop things like that, because that's why they failed in these important developments! And please don't come with the excuse of, we did it the first time, because they knew that when they started these developments and if you know this, you think twice or three times about deadlines, partners or JVs to make this development easier.
Everytime when an DRDO official talks about a new development and calls it "ambitous" an alarm starts in my head! Why the hell do they always try things that are beyond their reach? Why not show some basics, that are less shiny? AESA radar before MMR works, AMCA before LCA works, AURA although Rustom is still under development, we are not even close to have an armed drone let alone the expertise for stealth airframes yet, Kaveri (which is meant to power AURA) needs to be size and weight reduced, which is even more cruicial for an UCAV, than for LCA...
DRDO thinks they can do it all and they can do it all alone and that's the problem, they should stick with thinks they can do and let others do the rest, even though they might get the credit then, but pride is a big issue right?
I still rate AURA as the most important aircraft development for IAF, next to FGFA, because it add tactically much capability, is more cost-effective and relatively easier to develop than a 5th gen fighter. What I fear though, is that DRDO makes the same mistakes again and want to do everything alone! Making it dependent on Kaveri engine is the first move to this direction and since they develop our indigenous UAVs mainly alone, they might want to do the airframe design alone too, instead of using HALs experience. Just like they won't ask for JVs with foreign partners or countries, although IAI or Israel in this field would be the most logical and likely choices, since they have the highest knowledge with UAVs, don't get stealth UCAVs from other countries and currently don't even have that much money to fund such projects.
Indias main advantage is our foreign policy and our independence, that gives us access to markets and partnerships that only very few countries have in the world. Our private companies had shown this at the last defexpo for example and HAL had shown this with their successful helicopter side, GoI and MoD knows it through MKI, Brahmos and FGFA developments. When DRDO also realises this, they will move forward and be better as well, otherwise they will show the same failures as well.