What's new

India’s Transit Thru’ Bangladesh : Reaping benefit is a challenge

Black_cats

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
-5
12:00 AM, November 29, 2019 / LAST MODIFIED: 07:14 AM, November 29, 2019
India’s Transit Thru’ Bangladesh : Reaping benefit is a challenge

Routes finalised; meeting next month to fix charges for goods transportation

49
Shares
Rejaul Karim Byron and Porimol Palma

india_transit.jpg

India has been working strategically to connect its north-eastern region with the rest of the country through Bangladesh since Dhaka agreed to give New Delhi the privilege nine years back.

Experts say that Bangladesh should try to reap as much benefit of the new regional connectivity as possible.

India is developing the infrastructure needed to carry freight through Bangladesh, avoid lengthy detours and save time and money. Officials of the two countries will meet next month to decide which routes will be used at the beginning and how much India should pay Bangladesh in transit fees.

During a recent visit to India, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina agreed to let New Delhi use Chattogram and Mongla ports. This enables India to carry freight using Bangladesh’s river, rail lines and roads.

Economists say the improved connectivity can also help Bangladesh, which is located between South and Southeast Asia, to become a regional hub and growth centre.


RIVER PROTOCOL
In November 2010, India and Bangladesh for the first time signed a transit agreement.

The two governments in 2015 inked a protocol allowing India to use four riverways through Bangladesh, which would link Kolkata and Murshidabad to Assam, Tripura and Meghalaya.

Since Kolkata-Ashuganj-Akhaura river route became operational in June 2016, only 13 cargo vessels used it, paying Bangladesh Tk 28 lakh in transit fees.

Shipping ministry officials said Indian businesses were not using the route regularly as the roads and ports needed to use the waterway were not ready yet.

During Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s visit to Delhi from October 3-6, the two countries decided to utilise a river route from Murshidabad’s Dhulian to Tripura’s Sonamura via Rajshahi.

Officials hope this and other river routes would be operational soon.

PORT USE
The two countries signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) regarding the use of Chattogram and Mongla ports in 2015, after years of demand from India. Subsequently, the countries signed an agreement last year and a standard operating procedure (SoP) during Hasina’s visit in October.

According to the SoP, goods that reach Chattogram and Mongla sea ports, will be carried by road, rail, and water ways to Agartala (Tripura) via Akhaura; Dawki (Meghalaya) via Tamabil; Sutarkandi (Assam) via Sheola, and Srimantpur (Tripura) via Bibirbazar.

The SoP covers waterways, roads and railways. It will allow the landlocked Assam, Meghalaya and Tripura states to access open sea trade routes through Chattogram and Mongla ports.

Under the 2015 river protocol, vessels were allowed to carry a maximum of 2,000 tonnes of cargo. But now larger ships would ply the waterways, increasing the trade volume and reducing logistic costs.

Tripura will be connected to Chattogram Port through the Feni Bridge over the Feni river in Sabroom town of South Tripura and Ramgarh in Khagrachhari. India is constructing the roads and railways to Sabroom as part of its massive development works in the northeast, according to Indian media.

Shipping ministry officials said a secretary-level meeting between the two countries next month will decide when to begin using the routes and what would be the fee for using the port.

INFRASTRUCTURE UNDER INDIAN LINE OF CREDIT
India has so far provided three lines of credit (LoCs) worth $7.5 billion, and majority of the money is meant to develop infrastructure needed for the connectivity through Bangladesh.

For example, Bangladesh is in the process of constructing a bay container terminal in Chittagong Port, further developing Mongla Port, and building four-lane highways for Ramgarh-Baruerhat, Cumilla-Brahmanbaria-Sarail, and Ashuganj river port-Sarail-Dharkhar-Akhaura land port routes.

Under the Indian LoCs, Bangladesh is also establishing an inland container river port in Ashuganj, doubling the rail lines from Khulna-Darshana Junction and upgrading the metre gauge lines to dual gauge lines from Parbatipur to Kaunia.

The government is also establishing Indian economic zones in Mongla, Bheramara and Mirsarai and an IT Special Economic Zone in Keraniganj.

Implementation of a motor vehicle agreement among Bangladesh, Bhutan, India and Nepal will further enhance trade and connectivity, with Bangladesh at its helm.

CAN DHAKA REAP THE BENEFIT?
Dhaka may charge fees for the Indian goods shipped through Bangladesh and can increase its export volumes too, experts said.

Under the SoP, in Chattogram and Mongla ports, “Movement of cargo will be exempted from customs duties or any other taxes other than administrative operational fees and other charges prescribed by the inter-governmental committee for transit of goods.”

Such fees and other charges shall be admissible as per the provision of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade unless parties agree to more favourable terms as part of a special trade agreement, reads the SoP.

Shipping ministry officials said a secretary-level meeting scheduled for next month will decide what charges will be set for using the ports and the routes. The meeting will decide whether the charges will be similar to the fees applicable for the Kolkata-Ashuganj-Akhaura route or higher.

The officials said they are deciding how much Bangladesh may charge before the meeting next month. For port use, they are considering whether to impose ten types of charges.

Under the river protocol, Bangladesh charges Tk 277 for each tonne of freight. Of this, Tk 50 and Tk 34 are charged for security and anchoring at the jetty.

The commerce ministry had formed a core committee on fixing charges of transit and transshipment. Its proposal to charge at least Tk 1,058 for each tonne was not accepted by Bangladesh government.

Therefore, officials of both the countries later fixed the charges at Tk 277.

Mohammad Yunus, research director at the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies, who was a member of the committee, said,“If the recommendation is implemented, Bangladesh will benefit.”

“We need to see what we are gaining because the infrastructure is being built with our money,” he told The Daily Star.

Prime Minister’s Economic Affairs Adviser Dr Mashiur Rahman, however, pointed out that the recommendations were not based on empirical studies.

Shipping ministry officials said local transport companies would benefit when the goods are transported through the country.

Economics Professor Selim Raihan of Dhaka University said the country’s low ranking in ease of doing business should be improved drastically to attract foreign investment.

“If we cannot draw investments to the economic zones, other countries will use our roads, ports and other infrastructure to boost their exports while we will lose,” he added.

The economic zones should be connected to the roads, rail and waterways that are being developed with the Indian credit, he observed.

https://www.thedailystar.net/frontp...hru-bangladesh-challenge-reap-benefit-1833220
 
.
No transit for these gandoos.

They will (as always) operate on the premise that they will get transit for next to nothing.

It is NOT in Bangladesh' commercial or political interest to let the NE Indian states develop - especially when we benefit letting them stay the way they are.

THINK...
 
.
This comes weeks after Indian minister threatened annexation and Bangladeshi FM claiming Bangladesh to be part of Indian Union.
 
.
The equation is simple for Bangladesh, if they want to access the market and resources of Nepal and Bhutan through NE India, they have to provide something tangible in return. Enough of charity for the freeloading Bangladeshis.
 
.
This comes weeks after Indian minister threatened annexation and Bangladeshi FM claiming Bangladesh to be part of Indian Union.

Plenty of fifth columnists in our govt. at this time. They will not follow our national interest (if it goes against India).

A sad situation which will only change when this woman passes...

Bangladesh has absolutely NOTHING to gain by providing transit to these Sanghi idiots. It is akin to Pakistan providing transit to India for Afghanistan through Khyber Pass. Pakistan has zero to gain as well and ain't gonna happen until hell freezes over.
 
.
Plenty of fifth columnists in our govt. at this time. They will not follow our national interest (if it goes against India).

A sad situation which will only change when this woman passes...

Bangladesh has absolutely NOTHING to gain by providing transit to these Sanghi idiots. It is akin to Pakistan providing transit to India for Afghanistan through Khyber Pass. Pakistan has zero to gain as well and ain't gonna happen until hell freezes over.

What is the general sentiments on the streets about this in Dhaka?
 
.
What is the general sentiments on the streets about this in Dhaka?

Well I don't really ask people on the streets, I do interact socially with 'so called Shareef Admi' in Bangladesh (if you can call them that).

They are mostly upper or very upper-middle-class Western-educated businessmen/industrialists, education at least at par with folks like Shashi Tharoor, independently wealthy folks with time left over in their hands to practice culture in between social event attendances. To a man - they all hate Chaiwala's moves and govt. impositions on Bangladesh govt. Indians are not seen as friends of Bangladesh, more like enemies.

Women I don't really interact with socially (don't talk politics with them), they are mostly apolitical, interested in different things than men other than uplift of the destitute folks and education/health related endeavors and subjects, which are nonetheless also quite important in their own right.

If you ask the avg. person on the streets, they all hate Indian govt. (private opinion) because India has so far proven itself to be extremely selfish when it comes to their national interest when dealing with Bangladesh.

This is all the more interesting because 99% of these folks have all been to India on shopping/tourism trips and know Indians personally on business dealings etc.
 
Last edited:
.
Seriously bastards charge 227 to per ton and then has the balls to charge people 200x tax by engine displacement and brand? **** these morons

The equation is simple for Bangladesh, if they want to access the market and resources of Nepal and Bhutan through NE India, they have to provide something tangible in return. Enough of charity for the freeloading Bangladeshis.
Yeah as soon as you’re done eating rats
 
.
Plenty of fifth columnists in our govt. at this time. They will not follow our national interest (if it goes against India).

A sad situation which will only change when this woman passes...

Bangladesh has absolutely NOTHING to gain by providing transit to these Sanghi idiots. It is akin to Pakistan providing transit to India for Afghanistan through Khyber Pass. Pakistan has zero to gain as well and ain't gonna happen until hell freezes over.
Then why dont you try and stop your govt. from going ahead on this. Lets see if that kind of attitude will benefit Bangladesh or not.

Well I don't really ask people on the streets, I do interact socially with 'so called Shareef Admi' in Bangladesh (if you can call them that).

They are mostly upper or very upper-middle-class Western-educated businessmen/industrialists, education at least at par with folks like Shashi Tharoor, independently wealthy folks with time left over in their hands to practice culture in between social event attendances. To a man - they all hate Chaiwala's moves and govt. impositionson Bangladesh govt. Indians are not seen as friends of Bangladesh, more like enemies.

Women I don't really interact with socially (don't talk politics with them), they are mostly apolitical, interested in different things than men other than uplift of the destitute folks and education/health related endeavors and subjects, which are nonetheless also quite important in their own right.

If you ask the avg. person on the streets, they all hate Indian govt. (private opinion) because India has so far proven itself to be extremely selfish when it comes to their national interest when dealing with Bangladesh.

This is all the more interesting because 99% of these folks have all been to India on shopping/tourism trips and know Indians personally on business dealings etc.
Can you explain "extremely selfish" how? India working for its own interests shouldnt be seen as a problem if it doesnt harm Bangladesh. India doesnt owe anything to BD. I would like to know what selfish reasons you have.
 
.
Then why dont you try and stop your govt. from going ahead on this. Lets see if that kind of attitude will benefit Bangladesh or not.

Oh you bet we will see to our interests, and what's "that kind of attitude"??

What is Bangladesh - some belligerent twelve-year-old that has misbehaved and now will be sent to its room?? In this topic even Hasina does not want to pander to Indian selfish interests. What's in it for us to improve the lot of these ingrate seven sisters idiots? Nothing, zero, nada, zilch. Let the seven sisters rot like they have for eons. Why should we help improve your economy by providing transit? What's in it for us?

We better your sub-saharan BIMARU hellhole in every health and education category and don't need you. You export your garbage to us and get rich, yet we have plenty of other options. The day you stop your exports to us and shut the border, will be God's supreme blessing....

Go get educated if you don't know.

Can you explain "extremely selfish" how? India working for its own interests shouldnt be seen as a problem if it doesnt harm Bangladesh. India doesnt owe anything to BD. I would like to know what selfish reasons you have.

That is the problem, you guys shutting off water at Farakka and for Teesta hasn't harmed us? You shoot normal cow smugglers and trespassers at the border like animals, you steal our water in Tripura, steal our marine assets (fish) blind to the tune of hundreds of millions every year, and that doesn't harm us??

Last year India transited tens of thousands of tonnes of rice to NE India via Bangladesh and didn't pay one red cent. It was 'humanitarian' favor we did. Well we are done doing favors.

Your Indian media is the most 'Ch*tiya' of them all, they never highlight Bangladeshi misgivings and issues (neither does your govt. of course), and then when we in Bangladesh slam our doors on you for things like transit, every Indian says, "Rajoo what happened??"

Read the following and then come back to discuss (it's your media and Chaiwala who are jumping up and down at the prospects and licking their chops, too bad it hasn't happened in twenty years and won't likely ever happen - Thanks but no thanks),

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/how-...ts-landlocked-northeast.641779/#post-11872134
 
.
This transit to India is hardly gonna benefit Bangladesh because Northeast India has a tiny economy with a very small amount of natural resources. Neither they are an attractive market for our exports nor they can supply any substantial raw materials to our industries.

What we could have done is to use this as a strategic leverage to negotiate other bilateral deals with India, river-water sharing for instance. However, considering how things are going, I don't think the govt. has any interest in doing so.

Can you explain "extremely selfish" how? India working for its own interests shouldnt be seen as a problem if it doesnt harm Bangladesh. India doesnt owe anything to BD. I would like to know what selfish reasons you have.

Well, if it was not for Bangladesh, Northeast India would be teeming with separatist flags even in the state capitals and India would have been on the brink of balkanization. You owe your existence to Bangladesh.

As a matter of fact, Indian jawans killed in Northeast are far greater than those killed in Kashmir and Indo-Pak border.
 
.
"strategic leverage to negotiate other bilateral deals with India, river-water sharing for instance."

Happy to see that a few Bangladeshis are finally reconciling to the inevitable. Bangladesh would definitely get a fair share of Teesta waters at some predetermined cost. It will be a win-win situation for both the countries.


As a matter of fact, Indian jawans killed in Northeast are far greater than those killed in Kashmir and Indo-Pak border.

:rofl::rofl::rofl:
And the guy pretends to be in the know-how of things. Such pretentious fools populate Bangladesh.
 
.
This transit to India is hardly gonna benefit Bangladesh because Northeast India has a tiny economy with a very small amount of natural resources. Neither they are an attractive market for our exports nor they can supply any substantial raw materials to our industries.

What we could have done is to use this as a strategic leverage to negotiate other bilateral deals with India, river-water sharing for instance. However, considering how things are going, I don't think the govt. has any interest in doing so.



Well, if it was not for Bangladesh, Northeast India would be teeming with separatist flags even in the state capitals and India would have been on the brink of balkanization. You owe your existence to Bangladesh.

As a matter of fact, Indian jawans killed in Northeast are far greater than those killed in Kashmir and Indo-Pak border.
"Owe your existence". Tell that to millions of raped, killed and tortured in 1971. And if it wasnt for India, your PM would have been locked up in another country and Bangaldesh wouldnt even exist. And thats the most rational thought unlike your delusions. So stop whining. Providing transit for goods isnt some extraordinary thing you are doing that has no parallel. Every neighboring country does that on agreed terms.
We tolerate your cow smuggling and illegal migration too.

Oh you bet we will see to our interests, and what's "that kind of attitude"??

What is Bangladesh - some belligerent twelve-year-old that has misbehaved and now will be sent to its room?? In this topic even Hasina does not want to pander to Indian selfish interests. What's in it for us to improve the lot of these ingrate seven sisters idiots? Nothing, zero, nada, zilch. Let the seven sisters rot like they have for eons. Why should we help improve your economy by providing transit? What's in it for us?

We better your sub-saharan BIMARU hellhole in every health and education category and don't need you. You export your garbage to us and get rich, yet we have plenty of other options. The day you stop your exports to us and shut the border, will be God's supreme blessing....

Go get educated if you don't know.



That is the problem, you guys shutting off water at Farakka and for Teesta hasn't harmed us? You shoot normal cow smugglers and trespassers at the border like animals, you steal our water in Tripura, steal our marine assets (fish) blind to the tune of hundreds of millions every year, and that doesn't harm us??

Last year India transited tens of thousands of tonnes of rice to NE India via Bangladesh and didn't pay one red cent. It was 'humanitarian' favor we did. Well we are done doing favors.

Your Indian media is the most 'Ch*tiya' of them all, they never highlight Bangladeshi misgivings and issues (neither does your govt. of course), and then when we in Bangladesh slam our doors on you for things like transit, every Indian says, "Rajoo what happened??"

Read the following and then come back to discuss (it's your media and Chaiwala who are jumping up and down at the prospects and licking their chops, too bad it hasn't happened in twenty years and won't likely ever happen - Thanks but no thanks),

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/how-...ts-landlocked-northeast.641779/#post-11872134

The water disputes need to be resolved, but India will always look for the best interests of its own citizens first. The farakka barrage was necessary because of siltation of Kolkata port. And the current proposal for Teesta river will cause problems for farmers in northern West Bengal.
If you dont want your smugglers and trespassers be killed or arrested, then ask your border guards to do a better job. Its a problem you created.
 
.
"Owe your existence". Tell that to millions of raped, killed and tortured in 1971. And if it wasnt for India, your PM would have been locked up in another country and Bangaldesh wouldnt even exist. And thats the most rational thought unlike your delusions. So stop whining. Providing transit for goods isnt some extraordinary thing you are doing that has no parallel. Every neighboring country does that on agreed terms.
We tolerate your cow smuggling and illegal migration too.



The water disputes need to be resolved, but India will always look for the best interests of its own citizens first. The farakka barrage was necessary because of siltation of Kolkata port. And the current proposal for Teesta river will cause problems for farmers in northern West Bengal.
If you dont want your smugglers and trespassers be killed or arrested, then ask your border guards to do a better job. Its a problem you created.

Keep begging for transit. Not happening.

Everyone in Bangladesh (even AL) is against it.
 
.
"Owe your existence". Tell that to millions of raped, killed and tortured in 1971. And if it wasnt for India, your PM would have been locked up in another country and Bangaldesh wouldnt even exist. And thats the most rational thought unlike your delusions. So stop whining. Providing transit for goods isnt some extraordinary thing you are doing that has no parallel. Every neighboring country does that on agreed terms.
We tolerate your cow smuggling and illegal migration too.

Knew that was coming.

India helped us getting independence to break its chief enemy state into two and to prevent being encircled by them. You did a favor to yourself.

We are providing transit that serves no financial benefits to us rather invites extra financial burden in terms of the LoCs and are taking care of your security in your Northeast at the cost of our own strategic and security interests. We are doing a favor to you.

There is a big difference between the two. Once you take your Indian hat off, you will be able to see the difference by applying minimum common sense.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom