What's new

India's top court decriminalizes gay sex in landmark ruling

Kash yeh faisla dyny walon or support kerny walon k maan or baap dono gay hotay...in zaleelon se yeh dunya pak rehti.
 
.
Transgenders are part of human beings homosexual is a different subject, you may not a transgender but still you can be a homo if by chance you feel to have sex with another guy. Any disability is natural phenomena but sex with same gender despite of not having any disorderness or disability is what humans have started to commit on their own behalf. What do you say about cannibalism? Is it fine for you if few start to say who we are to judge cannibals?
Homosexuals are a different subject?
Are you trying to tell me that you consider trans people, with hormonal variances as humans but homosexuals who are biologically identical to straight people except for who they find attractive, don't count as humans?

As for the cannibal quip, nobody is getting hurt in a same sex relationship, whereas somebody gets hurt in your cannibal relation. It's between two consenting adults, that's the whole point. The only people who get hurt in a homosexual relation are homophobes.
 
.
Homosexuals are a different subject?
Are you trying to tell me that you consider trans people, with hormonal variances as humans but homosexuals who are biologically identical to straight people except for who they find attractive, don't count as humans?

As for the cannibal quip, nobody is getting hurt in a same sex relationship, whereas somebody gets hurt in your cannibal relation. It's between two consenting adults, that's the whole point. The only people who get hurt in a homosexual relation are homophobes.
Hi, don't try to put your words in my mouth, where i said homo don't count as humans? Don't try to turn this discussion in a moronic debate. You are only trying to understand what you want to, my words were clear don't give them different meaning.

Many cannibals eat dead people, now what will you say? who we are to decide about cannibalism until they are eating deads?

Indians as a society may not be able to accept open homosexuality in their surrounding despite of court verdict.
 
.
Hi, don't try to put your words in my mouth, where i said homo don't count as humans? Don't try to turn this discussion in a moronic debate. You are only trying to understand what you want to, my words were clear don't give them different meaning.

Many cannibals eat dead people, now what will you say? who we are to decide about cannibalism until they are eating deads?

Indians as a society may not be able to accept open homosexuality in their surrounding despite of court verdict.
Then let's clear the misunderstandings. My understanding is you would be opposed to a similar decriminalization in Pakistan. Your reason for it is not religious, but you consider it unnatural from a biological point of view. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Hi, don't try to put your words in my mouth, where i said homo don't count as humans? Don't try to turn this discussion in a moronic debate. You are only trying to understand what you want to, my words were clear don't give them different meaning.

Many cannibals eat dead people, now what will you say? who we are to decide about cannibalism until they are eating deads?

Indians as a society may not be able to accept open homosexuality in their surrounding despite of court verdict.
No, Indians will find it hard to accept this verdict at first, at least in the rural regions. Hopefully, that will change.
 
.
Then let's clear the misunderstandings. My understanding is you would be opposed to a similar decriminalization in Pakistan. Your reason for it is not religious, but you consider it unnatural from a biological point of view. Correct me if I'm wrong.


No, Indians will find it hard to accept this verdict at first, at least in the rural regions. Hopefully, that will change.
Homosexuality does exist in Pakistan, let me accept it and due to religious and natural repercussions it is condemned. every Abrahamic religion condemns homosexuality. My reasons are to oppose homosexual acts not any gender but homo in particular are naturally not favourable for human civilization, on religious terms its a sin and I am not having any homo traits in personal, indeed its disgusting for me. Any disorderness can be cured , any desease can be cured. Transgenders are human and should have equal respect and rights in society. Same gender sex are equivalent to cannibals or mass murderer to me. Humans committing inhumane acts.
 
. .
Homosexuality does exist in Pakistan, let me accept it and due to religious and natural repercussions it is condemned. every Abrahamic religion condemns homosexuality. My reasons are to oppose homosexual acts not any gender but homo in particular are naturally not favourable for human civilization, on religious terms its a sin and I am not having any homo traits in personal, indeed its disgusting for me. Any disorderness can be cured , any desease can be cured. Transgenders are human and should have equal respect and rights in society. Same gender sex are equivalent to cannibals or mass murderer to me. Humans committing inhumane acts.
We started acting inhuman since the first primitive sharpened a stone with the intention of stabbing someone, and haven't looked back since. Here we are now, splitting atoms to kill off our own species. How is this any less human or against nature?
To me, this is as justifiable as anything humans have achieved as a civilization. As humanity progresses, I'm sure we will move further away from what some people would consider God or nature. Better get used to it.

At the least, your views don't seem to be guided by religion to me.

You do realize the irony of us arguing this topic when you have the name '@CIS-TRANS' right? Although I'm guessing you took the name after cis-trans isomerism in organic chemistry.
 
.
We started acting inhuman since the first primitive sharpened a stone with the intention of stabbing someone, and haven't looked back since. Here we are now, splitting atoms to kill off our own species. How is this any less human or against nature?
To me, this is as justifiable as anything humans have achieved as a civilization. As humanity progresses, I'm sure we will move further away from what some people would consider God or nature. Better get used to it.

At the least, your views don't seem to be guided by religion to me.

You do realize the irony of us arguing this topic when you have the name '@CIS-TRANS' right? Although I'm guessing you took the name after cis-trans isomerism in organic chemistry.
That term war is quite a massive debate, few take it as pride and few take it as guilt. i am tired of this debate. homos exist in our society and despite of our disagreement we tend to accept them quietly and i do agree that the indian society with passage of time will eventually accept the verdict and its outcomes.
As far as Cis-trans is concerned yes you are right, its the same cis-trans of isomers and some how i find it a fine name for me. Have a good day.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom