What's new

India’s submarines make strategic move to dominate Indian Ocean

Kailash Kumar

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 8, 2018
Messages
4,643
Reaction score
-1
Country
Suriname
Location
Netherlands
India’s Submarines Make Strategic Move To Dominate Indian Ocean

H I Sutton

Jun 20, 2020

The Indian Navy is discretely building up its submarine capabilities. The most visible aspect of India’s programs are new nuclear-powered submarines that are being built, but beneath the surface there are other strategic steps to help ensure its Navy’s dominance of the Indian Ocean. The Navy is also reinforcing its presence in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, close to the strategically vital Strait of Malacca.

This is against a backdrop of heightened tensions with China. These look as if they could turn explosive at any moment despite efforts to deescalate. Most recently a border clash in the Galwan Valley left at least 20 Indian soldiers dead. The Indian Navy may be playing an active part in that crisis, far away from the sea, but its focus remains the Indian Ocean and the Strait of Malacca.

This is critical because China’s naval power is growing, and with it the ability to project power into the Indian Ocean. Analysts see a massive increase in the Chinese Navy, known as the PLAN, over the coming years. Writing in the Sunday Guardian, Captain James E. Fanell recently predicted that the PLAN will have 110 submarines by 2030. But the Strait of Malacca will remain a bottleneck between China’s home waters and the Indian Ocean.

China’s next generation Type-095 submarines, which are approaching first launch, will get stealthier and more advanced. But more importantly, they are expected to be much larger, which translates into longer-range missions.

China’s current Type-093 Shang Class is nuclear powered, so it already has virtually unlimited range, but they are smaller on the inside than many other nuclear subs. This limits its crew and its endurance since human factors become a major constraint on nuclear submarine range.

If the Chinese Navy plans to venture into the Indian Ocean, then the larger Type-095 will be a major boost to their capabilities. China already has a naval base in Djibouti that gives it a permanent presence in the region. And there is work going on at Gwadar port in Pakistan that is rumored to include another overseas base for the Chinese Navy.

Closer to home, India's traditional foe, the Pakistani Navy, is also modernizing and expanding its submarine fleet. This includes new patrol submarines from China, and also updating its special forces ‘X-Craft’ midget submarines.

With these emerging threats in the Indian Ocean, India’s established submarine bases needed updating. The ones on the east coast, in the Bay of Bengal, give natural protection from the the Pakistani Navy, which is on India’s western flank. INS Varsha, a new submarine base, is being built there to house India’s nuclear submarine deterrent. This is termed strategic depth. But the east coast bases are still some way away from the Strait of Malacca, which could be critical in a future conflict.

With Indian submarines now sometimes operating from Port Blair in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, which are Indian territory much further east, they will be better placed to respond to a crisis there. Indian diesel-electric submarines are well suited to operating in the relatively shallow waters there. They could act as a buffer and forward eyes for India’s nuclear submarines patrolling the deep waters.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/hisutt...ove-to-dominate-in-indian-ocean/#48b4618c604f
 
.
Copy and paster's note:

I have noticed in the last few days with articles and reports (from all around the Internet) on the confrontation between India and China that the Indian media is pro-India, the Chinese media is pro-China and the Pakistani media is pro-China. This was all expected. However, most of the Western media outlets are sort of neutral or pro-India (such as the one in the original post).

For example, in The Netherlands where they usually do not give a flying, swimming or walking f*ck about India or South Asians in general, they reported, albeit shortly, the confrontation between India and China on the national news. In this report they said that there were 20 casualties on the Indian side and 23 on the Chinese side, although they did say that the Chinese number was unconfirmed. These numbers, however, made it seem that it was India who won the confrontation or at least that is was a tie.

Also, a couple of weeks ago (8 june 2020), I read an article from a weekly conservative national news and opinion magazine 'Elsevier Weekblad' with a title that was a quote from a Dutch diplomat stating that 'India and the United States are finding each other against China' (Dutch: 'India en Amerika vinden elkaar tegen China')(https://www.elsevierweekblad.nl/ned...en-amerika-vinden-elkaar-tegen-china-205289w/).

The West is obviously pitting India against China. They already supported India before against China, but then the support was more subtle. Now it seems that they are more open about it.
The problem however is the corruption and incompetence of the Indian Army.
The support of the West will, because of this, not result in achieving what they want, which is to stop China.
So, I do think that if the West bets on India, it will be a wrong bet.
 
.
Copy and paster's note:
The problem however is the corruption and incompetence of the Indian Army.

Indian army is not corrupt....it is like any other army....what instances do you have that says that Indian Army is corrupt?

So, I do think that if the West bets on India, it will be a wrong bet.

India is not in a position to counter China *alone* in a full-scale war at this time [or in very near future]............every one understands this......However, India can do capacity building.....

Currently, Indian economy is badly impacted by covid.
 
. . . .
Copy and paster's note:

I have noticed in the last few days with articles and reports (from all around the Internet) on the confrontation between India and China that the Indian media is pro-India, the Chinese media is pro-China and the Pakistani media is pro-China. This was all expected. However, most of the Western media outlets are sort of neutral or pro-India (such as the one in the original post).

For example, in The Netherlands where they usually do not give a flying, swimming or walking f*ck about India or South Asians in general, they reported, albeit shortly, the confrontation between India and China on the national news. In this report they said that there were 20 casualties on the Indian side and 23 on the Chinese side, although they did say that the Chinese number was unconfirmed. These numbers, however, made it seem that it was India who won the confrontation or at least that is was a tie.

Also, a couple of weeks ago (8 june 2020), I read an article from a weekly conservative national news and opinion magazine 'Elsevier Weekblad' with a title that was a quote from a Dutch diplomat stating that 'India and the United States are finding each other against China' (Dutch: 'India en Amerika vinden elkaar tegen China')(https://www.elsevierweekblad.nl/ned...en-amerika-vinden-elkaar-tegen-china-205289w/).

The West is obviously pitting India against China. They already supported India before against China, but then the support was more subtle. Now it seems that they are more open about it.
The problem however is the corruption and incompetence of the Indian Army.
The support of the West will, because of this, not result in achieving what they want, which is to stop China.
So, I do think that if the West bets on India, it will be a wrong bet.
It's a free hit for the West. A win win.
They'll egg on the Indians to fight the Chinese, all the while making money from arms sales, if the Chinese are disrupted, win, if the Indians get a battering, nothing lost.
I'm surprised the Indians don't see that.
The best course for India is to stop trying to be a hegemon, mend fences with her neighbours and develop and progress with them for the sake of the prosperity of her people.
 
. . .
Indian army is not corrupt....it is like any other army....what instances do you have that says that Indian Army is corrupt?

Some links as an answer to you question:
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/sto...nce-society-corruption-act-1599835-2019-09-16

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/corruption-in-army

https://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/c...he-indian-army-proves-to-be-resilient-2639258

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Corruption_in_defence_procurement_in_India

https://www.indianmirror.com/corruption/armedforces-corruption.html

https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...ternational/articleshow/49655141.cms?from=mdr

https://www.india.com/news/india/ge...in-military-housing-projects-reports-3749782/

India is not in a position to counter China *alone* in a full-scale war at this time [or in very near future]............every one understands this......However, India can do capacity building.....

Currently, Indian economy is badly impacted by covid.

Do you think that when an actual war will happen between India and China, that Western countries will join India?
I do not think so.
They might provide some logistic support, satellite data and (useless) diplomatic statements and resolutions but that would be it. Nothing more.
India would be on her own.
 
Last edited:
.
There was a time when I used to think the Indians were smart.
 
. .
India is not in a position to counter China *alone* in a full-scale war at this time [or in very near future]
Except Russia, no other main players in India ocean want India to do capacity building on navy. These countries expect India to put its main resources on ground army.

USA of course, wish India can contribute to the counterbalance to China, but definitely doesn't want India become a dominant power in Indian ocean. So does China. Because of Tibet Plateau, China has dominant advantage over the border conflict (Note: India's most essence area is just three hundred kilometers away from the border, which is under china's conventional weapons attack range), but Indian ocean right now is quite far away in consideration of China's navy capability. Considering the importance of Indian ocean, China is quite happy to play some games on border and divert India's attention from India ocean.
 
Last edited:
.
Except Russia, no other main players in India ocean want India to do capacity building on navy. These countries expect India to put its main resources on ground army.

USA of course, wish India can contribute to the counterbalance to China, but definitely doesn't want India become a dominant power in Indian ocean. So does China. Because of Tibet Plateau, China has dominant advantage over the border conflict (Note: India's most essence area is just three hundred kilometers away from the border, which is under china's conventional weapons attack range), but Indian ocean right now is quite far away in consideration of China's navy capability.
India has believed it's own hype and made a pact with the devil in order to become top dog in Asia in order to satisfy a malicious ego.
They are going to need a very long spoon.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom