What's new

India’s soft power trumps language barrier in Iraq

T-72M1

BANNED
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Messages
1,795
Reaction score
-17
Country
India
Location
India
India’s soft power trumps language hurdle in Iraq
Sameer Arshad | TNN | Feb 19, 2016, 03.39 AM IST

KARBALA (IRAQ): In a country where security is the key concern amid a war with savages of Daesh (an acronym derived from the Arabic name for Islamic S tate terrorist group), the term al Hind (India) is virtually a free pass.
Invocation of the term prompts instant expressions like ahlan wasahlan (welcome) and references to Bollywood stars — Shah Rukh Khan and Amitabh Bachchan - while a few speak English here. Bollywood's soft power and India's reputation as a destination for quality , affordable healthcare trump the language barrier.

"A local journalist who spoke only Arabic smiled and repeated Shah Rukh, Shah Rukh... every time he crossed my path during an interaction," said a journalist, who was part of an Indian media delegation to Iraq, while highlighting the goodwill he experienced. Rasha Saeed, 26, who lives at a camp for those displaced due to Daesh terror , told the delegation Bollywood was the only thing she knew about India.

"I watch Bollywood films," she said while pointing towards a TV set inside her makeshift prefabricated house near Karbala. Saeed, whose husband has sought refuge in Germany , followed the delegation to their bus insisting how they could leave without having lunch.

Bangalore-based educationist Aga Sultan Murthuza, who was part of the delegation and involved in humanitarian work in Iraq, was mobbed at the camp with requests for facilitating treatment in India. He said r enowned Bangalore-based cardiac surgeon Dr Devi Shetty's generosity toward Iraqis has boosted goodwill for India.

"I was moved by the lack of medical care in Karbala when my mother fell sick as we first visited the shrine of prophet Muhammad's grandson, Husain, here in 2005," Murthuza told TOI.

He said Shetty helped him set up a telemedicine centre in Karbala besides sending a team of doctors and technicians to Iraq for setting up medical camps. "The director of Husain's shrine, Syed Saadudin Hashim, had a condition where his heart used to beat 190 times a minute. He needed a correction which was done in Bangalore." Murthuza said they set up the telemedicine centre after realising many patients travelled to India for even consultations.

"Many patients are now suggested treatment locally, which has saved lots of money."

He said the Karbala shrine was now building its own hospitals with Shetty's technical help. "This has created tremendous goodwill for India. Dr Shetty has even performed many surgeries on Iraqis free or at subsidised costs," said Murthuza, who has sponsored many Iraqi engineers for training in Karnataka. Al Hind is also part of Iraq's collective memory since trader Rahab Dutt sent his sons to fight for Husain in the battle of Karbala against evil ruler , Yazid, in the seventh century .

Dutt is believed to have rushed his sons to fight for Husain in line with the promise he had made to the Prophet of helping him uphold the truth while trading in Arabia. Dutt's descendants have since been known as Husaini Brahmins. They are said to be born with a slash mark on their throats, symbolising their ancestors sacrifice for Husain.

A couplet of Mohammad Ali Jauhar, who led Khilafat movement along with Mahatma Gandhi, explains the significance of Karbala:

"Qatl-eHusain asl mein marg-e-Yazeed hai. Islam zinda hota hai har Karbala kay baad (The murder of Hussain is the end of Yazid. Islam is refreshed by the blood of the martyrs of Karbala)."

Bollywood actor Sunil Dutt was among the prominent Husaini Brahmins. Besides Husain Brahmin help, Mauryan king Chandragupta is also said to have sent a large force to Iraq to help Husain. But it was too late by the time Mauryan army reached Kufa, where they were housed in a place known as Dair-i-Hindiya (the Indian quarter) today.

(The writer was in Iraq at the invitation of Karbala's Imam Husain shrine)

India’s soft power trumps language hurdle in Iraq - Times of India
 
.
A unique power of India.
Soft power .I think US is the only one that can challenge India in Soft power
 
.
Bollywood actor Sunil Dutt was among the prominent Husaini Brahmins. Besides Husain Brahmin help, Mauryan king Chandragupta is also said to have sent a large force to Iraq to help Husain. But it was too late by the time Mauryan army reached Kufa, where they were housed in a place known as Dair-i-Hindiya (the Indian quarter) today.

(The writer was in Iraq at the invitation of Karbala's Imam Husain shrine)

India’s soft power trumps language hurdle in Iraq - Times of India

kidding me?!!!!!!! :suicide:
Chandragupta died more than 200 year before Jesus born.
 
.
Good to know, India should actually use its expertise set up medical facilities and help the poor in these countries.
 
. . .
they might be referring to Chandra Gupta ll
Chandragupta II belonged to Gupta dynasty. The article clearly says Mauryan king, which means belonging to Mauryan dynasty. Islam, let alone Christianity was not even founded at that period, since Mauryan dynasty dates back to BC and not AD/CE.
 
. .
@BDforever do you have tele-medicine in BD? Maybe, you and your friend could setup one in Bangladesh with Devi Shetty or others? Seems they are open to it?

I think they mean the Mohiyal Dynasty. He must have heard it from somebody and then mistaken believed it to be Maurya Dynasty. ChandraGupta II is impossible. Since Battle of Karbala is dated to 680 AD and the Gupta dynasty ended at-least a century before that. And Chandragupta II would have been dead for couple of centuries, at the least.
 
.
India’s soft power trumps language hurdle in Iraq
Sameer Arshad | TNN | Feb 19, 2016, 03.39 AM IST

KARBALA (IRAQ):

Al Hind is also part of Iraq's collective memory since trader Rahab Dutt sent his sons to fight for Husain in the battle of Karbala against evil ruler , Yazid, in the seventh century .
Dutt is believed to have rushed his sons to fight for Husain in line with the promise he had made to the Prophet of helping him uphold the truth while trading in Arabia. Dutt's descendants have since been known as Husaini Brahmins. They are said to be born with a slash mark on their throats, symbolising their ancestors sacrifice for Husain.

A couplet of Mohammad Ali Jauhar, who led Khilafat movement along with Mahatma Gandhi, explains the significance of Karbala:

"Qatl-eHusain asl mein marg-e-Yazeed hai. Islam zinda hota hai har Karbala kay baad (The murder of Hussain is the end of Yazid. Islam is refreshed by the blood of the martyrs of Karbala)."

Bollywood actor Sunil Dutt was among the prominent Husaini Brahmins. Besides Husain Brahmin help, Mauryan king Chandragupta is also said to have sent a large force to Iraq to help Husain. But it was too late by the time Mauryan army reached Kufa, where they were housed in a place known as Dair-i-Hindiya (the Indian quarter) today.

(The writer was in Iraq at the invitation of Karbala's Imam Husain shrine)

India’s soft power trumps language hurdle in Iraq - Times of India




This is rubbish. The person who wrote this pack of myths has discredited himself, and so has the person who posted this.

How was it that a Hindu in Central India managed to send troops all the way to Kufa? In between the Epthali (Abdali) Pashtun empire was still in existence not to mention that to the east of the Caliphate were the lands of the former Shiites known as the Khwarij who had turned against Ali (A.S) after accusing him of behaving like a tyrant--they would have turned anyone supporting Ali or his family into mincemeat. Even if those lands had been crossed, there were still all the armies of the Caliphate before getting to Kufa...

....and of course in Kufa itself nothing would have been more likely to turn the people of Mecca and Medina against Hussein (A.S) than finding out he had allied with a bunch of idol-worshippers....even if he had been willing to do so...

The end of Hussein (A.S) was not the end of Yazeed. According to all but the most sectarian reports the Ummayads and the Hashemites were reconciled and inter-married e.g see Ahmad Kasravi the Iranian Shiite scholar. Most of the lies about Yazeed were concocted later by supporters of the Abbassids who have an excellent reputation for treachery, going so far as to kill the man who brought them to power. See for instance Imam Ghazzali (A.S) the Sufi masters refusal to condemn Yazeed because there was no decisive evidence against him (Sharh Bad al-Amali by Mulla Ali al-Qari, p 123-125).

Mohammad Ali Jauhar, btw was a Deobandi Sunni Muslim. What does he have to do with this?

I dare the OP. Let's see if you can get any of the regular Shia Iranian or Shia Iraqi members to confirm this nonsense that Hussein (A.S) is likely to have allied himself with idol-worshipers, let alone if this incident occurred.
 
.
This is rubbish. The person who wrote this pack of myths has discredited himself, and so has the person who posted this.

How was it that a Hindu in Central India managed to send troops all the way to Kufa? In between the Epthali (Abdali) Pashtun empire was still in existence not to mention that to the east of the Caliphate were the lands of the former Shiites known as the Khwarij who had turned against Ali (A.S) after accusing him of behaving like a tyrant--they would have turned anyone supporting Ali or his family into mincemeat. Even if those lands had been crossed, there were still all the armies of the Caliphate before getting to Kufa...

....and of course in Kufa itself nothing would have been more likely to turn the people of Mecca and Medina against Hussein (A.S) than finding out he had allied with a bunch of idol-worshippers....even if he had been willing to do so...

The end of Hussein (A.S) was not the end of Yazeed. According to all but the most sectarian reports the Ummayads and the Hashemites were reconciled and inter-married e.g see Ahmad Kasravi the Iranian Shiite scholar. Most of the lies about Yazeed were concocted later by supporters of the Abbassids who have an excellent reputation for treachery, going so far as to kill the man who brought them to power. See for instance Imam Ghazzali (A.S) the Sufi masters refusal to condemn Yazeed because there was no decisive evidence against him (Sharh Bad al-Amali by Mulla Ali al-Qari, p 123-125).

Mohammad Ali Jauhar, btw was a Deobandi Sunni Muslim. What does he have to do with this?

I dare the OP. Let's see if you can get any of the regular Shia Iranian or Shia Iraqi members to confirm this nonsense that Hussein (A.S) is likely to have allied himself with idol-worshipers, let alone if this incident occurred.
eh, why am I discredited from posting a bit of news ? don't kill the messenger, etc

I have zero knowledge, and frankly, even less interest in Islamic history, didn't read past the 2nd para, couldn't bare to. :sick:

what I do know, is that India have some goodwill in that war torn country, and that's a good thing.
 
.
eh, why am I discredited from posting a bit of news ? don't kill the messenger, etc

I have zero knowledge, and frankly, even less interest in Islamic history, didn't read past the 2nd para, couldn't bare to. :sick:

what I do know, is that India have some goodwill in that war torn country, and that's a good thing.

So you're posting material that you didn't even read?
 
. .
yeah I read, Indian doctors are helping Iraqis, they like that, they also like bollywood.

Cannibals also like people, and they like to keep them nice and fat before putting them in the pot. Suggest you stop spamming the forum with rubbish which you don't even waste the time reading yourself.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom