India’s sense of superiority miffs neighbors

[faithfulguy]

India wants to be me me me look at me in whole of south Asia, they suffer from attention disorder.
If a neighbor ignores them then india goes into overdrive to interfere in their back yard.
Once you come under them then you realize that this hindutva is going to target you with threats and blackmail ask Nepal, Bangladesh , Kashmiris etc.

India has low self esteem as it worship white westerners while oppress other Asians. It has a household slave mentality. It see itself superior to “field slaves”, which in this case are the other Asians. While it slavishly serve its white masters.

 

[Clutch]

South Asian countries are not so weak that mere "India sense of inferiority" i.e way of thought can cause havoc in their nation.

You being a Pakistani probably credit something as innocuous as "India sense of inferiority" to break-up of your nation in 1971 and believe it applies to all South Asian nations.

No.. it's all the bleaching that leads me to say so.

 

[Tom M]

We enjoy equally good relations with them if not more. India cares about domination and China cares about win win business opportunity, we don't meddle their internal affairs and make them to clearly state their allegiance, which we find it's very childish and amusing.

Yeah, SriLankan Hambantota port is a classic example of the so called win-win, the only question is who actually won ???? LOL

China signs 99-year lease on Sri Lanka’s Hambantota port

 

[beijingwalker]

Yeah, SriLankan Hambantota port is a classic example of the so called win-win, the only question is who actually won ???? LOL

China signs 99-year lease on Sri Lanka’s Hambantota port

Till we turn that into another Hong Kong and China is the only country who is capable of making that happen in today world, we will see how your empty airport goes in the future and who's gonna do a better job.

 

[Tom M]

Till we turn that into another Hong Kong and China is the only country who is capable of making that happen in today world, we will see how your empty airport goes in the future and who's gonna do a better job.

FYI, Honk Kong of today was not developed by China, rather it was the British who made it the Hong Kong that it is today.

No please keep you If's, But's and Will's aside. I'm not interested in speculations, rather talk when something real on ground happen.

And we have never cheated any country and will never do by selling our debit instruments in the disguise of development. Simply, we are not China.

 

[beijingwalker]

FYI, Honk Kong of today was not developed by China, rather it was the British who made it the Hong Kong that it is today.

No please keep you If's, But's and Will's aside. I'm not interested in speculations, rather talk when something real on ground happen.

And we have never cheated any country and will never do by selling our debit instruments in the disguise of development. Simply, we are not China.

Yes, Hong Kong was leased to Britain for 99 years when China was very weak. but what I mentioned is today's China, China built Shenzhen from a small fishing village into one of the most mega cities in today's world in less than 4 decades, what India did? If investments and offering others technology is cheating I believe India never cheats, cause you have neither.

 

[Ocean]

South Asian countries are not so weak that mere "India sense of inferiority" i.e way of thought can cause havoc in their nation.

You being a Pakistani probably credit something as innocuous as "India sense of inferiority" to break-up of your nation in 1971 and believe it applies to all South Asian nations.

We also credit 1962 indians arse kicking by Chinese to indias eternally existing "inferiority complex"

 

[KapitaanAli]

I wonder how many white tourists the Chinese posters in this thread begged today for photographs and autographs.

 

[beijingwalker]

I wonder how many white tourists the Chinese posters in this thread begged today for photographs and autographs.

I got several work for me, yes, I require them to sign in when they come to work to make sure they are late for work. Many Indians are looking for jobs in Beijing, but tough luck for them.

 

[Tom M]

Yes, Hong Kong was leased to Britain for 99 years when China was very weak. but what I mentioned is today's China, China built Shenzhen from a small fishing village into one of the most mega cities in today's world in less than 4 decades, what India did?

Why are you quoting wrong facts/lies as if other are unaware of history ????? LOL

China lost her sovereignty and control over Honk Kong when the Qing Empire gloriously lost against the British in the First Opium war, thereby effectively making HK a British colony. It was never a lease of 99 years as you are lying.

Sorry, India did nothing. All developments in India came just out of the blue.

If investments and offering others technology is cheating I believe India never cheats, cause you have neither.

Now please don't teach me business economics. For example, the case of Hambantota Port is a classic case of cheating than any form of Investment or development. I challenge you to indulge in a constructive discussion on the same with facts and I can prove that with timeline who China's Exim Bank and China Merchants Ports holding company, effectively the government of China beautifully entrapped Sri-Lanka in debt, thereby forcing them to lease their asset for 99 years, just to repay them.

 

[Azadkashmir]

India has low self esteem as it worship white westerners while oppress other Asians. It has a household slave mentality. It see itself superior to “field slaves”, which in this case are the other Asians. While it slavishly serve its white masters.

The funny thing is plenty of whites hate brown Asians.

 

[faithfulguy]

Why are you quoting wrong facts/lies as if other are unaware of history ????? LOL

China lost her sovereignty and control over Honk Kong when the Qing Empire gloriously lost against the British in the First Opium war, thereby effectively making HK a British colony. It was never a lease of 99 years as you are lying.

Sorry, India did nothing. All developments in India came just out of the blue.




Now please don't teach me business economics. For example, the case of Hambantota Port is a classic case of cheating than any form of Investment or development. I challenge you to indulge in a constructive discussion on the same with facts and I can prove that with timeline who China's Exim Bank and China Merchants Ports holding company, effectively the government of China beautifully entrapped Sri-Lanka in debt, thereby forcing them to lease their asset for 99 years, just to repay them.

China did lost sovereignty in HK island but leased the new territory for 99 years. India, on the other hand, never lost any territory. It was created by British, a wholly new nation, just like the USA. So India the geographical expression was colonized. But India the country was never invaded or colonized. Just like how Pakistan was never colonized. Both are equally new nations created at the same time. India the country happen to hijack a geographical name doesn’t make it an ancient nation.

 

[Jackdaws]

We enjoy equally good relations with them if not more. India cares about domination and China cares about win win business opportunity, we don't meddle their internal affairs and make them to clearly state their allegiance, which we find it's very childish and amusing.

I know that's how the communist media wants its citizens to see it.

 

[Tom M]

China did lost sovereignty in HK island but leased the new territory for 99 years. India, on the other hand, never lost any territory. It was created by British, a wholly new nation, just like the USA. So India the geographical expression was colonized. But India the country was never invaded or colonized. Just like how Pakistan was never colonized. Both are equally new nations created at the same time. India the country happen to hijack a geographical name doesn’t make it an ancient nation.

So what are you trying to imply ???

China was never fully colonized because it wasn't necessary. At first, the relative strength of the Qing state, combined with the sheer size of China, prevented colonial powers from simply taking China over. As time went on, through various wars and unequal treaties, the British and other nations were able to extract the money and resources that they wanted from China without directly administering the nation as a whole. They did this through taking over specific state functions, such as customs collection, and through demanding indemnity payment after various invasions. Essentially, they negotiated treaties (at gunpoint) which allowed them to trade with China on advantageous terms, and had the Qing state collect taxes to pay for indemnities. So, while cities like Shanghai, Guangzhou and Tianjin were semi-colonized, most of China wasn't directly controlled by foreign powers.

This doesn't make Historic China more powerful as you may try to imply multiple time here. The foreign powers choose not to occupy, so they didn't do that. Nothing else was stopping them if they wanted to.

 

[Dungeness]

India has low self esteem as it worship white westerners while oppress other Asians. It has a household slave mentality. It see itself superior to “field slaves”, which in this case are the other Asians. While it slavishly serve its white masters.

"Superior Slave Mentality" comes naturally from their caste ridden social structure.