RealNapster
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 6, 2015
- Messages
- 7,611
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
No idea yet. Will update if I find something on it.
Thanks.
I guess pakistan wouldnt make such mistake, oh shit, you dont have a nuclear submarine.
Midget, conventional or nuclear submarine. A hatch is a hatch and need to be closed anyways.
Feb. 27th 2019 showed that Pakistan doesn't need a nuclear submarine against 7× bigger india.........................
Oh comeon.
Do you really thing the incident was as simple as closing a hatch and no other complexities involved and you think such incidents dont happen elsewhere?
Indian media reported so. We have no choice but to "consider" that as true ( because we in our capacity cant verify. Can we?)
This is not a land attack submarine but ship attack submarine. So, the armament will be according to that requirement.
India will use Torpedoes and missiles like Brahmos and Nirbhay variant cruise missile to take out ships
Got it. But for this role a conventional AIP powered Submarine would have made more sense. Nuclear powered or diesel. You will have to surface for Supplies in 3 months anyways. Currently these subs const you Usd 2.8 billion each. For the amount of single submarine you could have constructed atleast 4 submarines. (AIP powered submarines cost between 600-800 million dollars). But then, i am no expert. Maybe IN have something in mind to justify this expense.
What if it was a distraction to hide another submarine which India was making - Aridhaman? INS Aridhaman was being stated as 2nd submarine but suddenly it became Arighat. There is no news of Aridhaman at all. So, there is a chance that India is having more submarine that what it claims
India dont do this. We do. Our weapons weapons, its development, operationability, are kept secret. You guys dont do that, with numbers atleast. So i wont buy this theory.