What's new

India’s permanent membership in UNSC: China continues stonewalling move, says major differences amon

That sounds pretty evil...

This is actually very clever.
This pretty much sums up Russia's role; and India's global standing

People don't understand. UNSC is an exclusive club. They will not allow any other to come in. If they really wanted to allow , Japan and Germany would have been in there already.

. The russians, why would they wish to give up their leverage over the Indians, say a resolution gets introduced, and India wants to block it, it no longer needs Russia to block it and it can block it unilaterally, thats a loss of leverage. but not expanding, Russia ensures an Indian dependency on it, to protect it in the UNSC.

Brilliantly put.
 
.
If India gets a permanent membership then we need a permanent membership for a Muslim country or OIC. a permanent membership for African Union aswell.

That’s true. One 1/4 of the World unrepresented on the Security Council, why the hell is Germany needed on there. Europe has plenty of representation.
 
. .
India’s permanent membership in UNSC: China continues stonewalling move, says major differences among members
By: PTI |
Published: January 16, 2020 7:22:28 PM
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, during his visit to New Delhi on Wednesday, backed India and Brazil to be permanent members of the UNSC.

india-china-ties.jpg

In his reply on Thursday, Geng said reform of the UNSC is very important as it concerns the long-term development of the UN and interests of all members.

China on Thursday played down Russia’s backing for India and Brazil’s entry into the UN Security Council as permanent member, saying all parties have “major differences” in the matter and instead advocated for a “package solution”.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, during his visit to New Delhi on Wednesday, backed India and Brazil to be permanent members of the UNSC. “We are convinced that the overriding trend of the global development is the objective process of the formation of new centres of economic might, financial power and political influence and India is obviously one of them,” Lavrov said.

Reacting to Lavrov’s statement, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said member countries of the UN have differences over reforms in the world body. China, which has veto power in the UNSC being one of its five permanent members, has been stonewalling India’s efforts to become permanent member of the powerful UN body for years, pointing out lack of consensus even though the other four — US, UK, France and Russia — have backed New Delhi’s membership.

Beijing’s all weather ally, Pakistan, is also opposed to India becoming a permanent member. India, Germany, Brazil and Japan have formed the G4 bloc to press for their permanent membership demand as part of the reforms in the United Nations.

China however has backed India for non-permanent membership of the UNSC for the year 2021-22.
In his reply on Thursday, Geng said reform of the UNSC is very important as it concerns the long-term development of the UN and interests of all members.

“Now all parties have major differences on this and we do not have broad consensus on the reform. So, China would like to work with other members to find a package solution that accommodates the interests and concerns of all parties through dialogue and consultation,” he said.

He said the UNSC is the core of international collective security mechanism and any reform to better implement its duty enshrined in the UN charter and the reform should enhance the representation and say of developing countries, so that more medium sized and small sized countries can participate in the decision-making process of the security council, he said.

https://www.financialexpress.com/de...says-major-differences-among-members/1825554/

Lol never in a million years.
If it's not broke don't fix it.
 
. . .
probably more hobos are living in US on streets than Pakistan's population.

pregnant mothers evicted from abandoned homes in USA


regards

well lets not change subjects here with unrelated matters to geopolitics and the UNSC, don't take stuff personally, I'm just pointing out the comedy of some of the silly users here saying stuff like "Pakistan should press for Permanent member of UNSC", if you say silly things like this, you shouldnt be surprised when people laugh.
 
.
Do we matter?

57 Islamic Nations can matter if only we didnt have puppets as leaders

Pakistan should press for Permanent member of UNSC

Countries like Saudi, Uae, Qatar, Turkey will fight for the hot seat. Pakistan couldn't attend KL summit without Saudis permission, permanent UN membership is for independent powerful nations.
 
.
That sounds pretty evil...
You could argue that China is doing the same thing by raising Kashmir in the UNSC, knowing that all other members will block any action.

Russia has been supporting UNSC reform since the Soviet Union days, there is no way Russia or any other P-5 would veto a resolution expanding the permanent members assuming one gets on the table.
 
.
These five permanent member will not allow any other country. Even russian will not allow india. Those are just public consumption statements .
 
.
That sounds pretty evil...
Whether that’s true or not.. you know there’s plenty evil people in this world of ours....walking around in their evil shoes with their evil hairstyles.
( on a serious note .. it’s an intriguing post)
 
.
Although India will realistically never become a permanent member, the current situation suits it just fine. At the end of the day, India's main goal wrt the UNSC is to keep it from holding formal sessions on Kashmir. France, Russia, and most likely USA will always support India on Kashmir(as evidenced by China's latest failed attempts) and the UK will most likely be neutral, so there is no chance on the UNSC taking action on Kashmir. Any other benefits from the UNSC for India can be acheived through non-permanent membership.
 
.
India does not stand a chance at getting a seat at UNSC unless its economy surpasses the Chinese by a fair margin. There is no chance for this to happen in our lifetime, so no point in talking about UNSC membership for the foreseeable future.
 
.
Correct. Russians know that China will never allow India in so they are just playing with India. They are scoring two objectives with one stone.

1. Russians know that China will veto any Indian attempts to get in so they(russians) don't have to veto it herself and earn indians anger.
2. By encouraging India , they are trying to fool indians into believing that somehow russians are in their favor outwardly.


Apart from China, r
These five permanent member will not allow any other country. Even russian will not allow india. Those are just public consumption statements .


Spot on...This is called internal match fixing...
 
.
Pakistan should press to actually become sovereign and not being so heavily dependent and functioning as a client state. the thoughts of a UNSC seat is a very far sort of thing. Its like a homeless guy living in a cardboard box, and then thinking, hmm... Maybe I should go and buy a Yacht for the swimming pool in my imaginary palace..

Pakistan is sovereign country....ask Trump how much Client state Pakistan has been in last 15 years LOL and he will show you all the bruises
 
.
Back
Top Bottom