Valiant_Soul
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2009
- Messages
- 506
- Reaction score
- 0
As far as Kargil is concerned Kashmir is a disputed territory and if you can occupy the land with force Pakistan has every right to re-occupy with force.
First, we did not occupy the land by force, it was acceded to us legally. Secondly, even if you think it is a disputed territory and India is holding it by force, then Pakistan should declare a proper war and try to free it. I would surely respect Pakistan for that and hold it in high regards. But instead it chooses to use insurgency and terrorism to free Kashmir, there lies my strong objection.
If you think I have been deceived about Indias negative role towards disruption in Pakistan please do some research about the Huge cache of Indian arms found in the very same terrorist camps used against you, this is mind boggling as I fail to comprehend why would india supply arms to someone who will use them against her.
How do you know this is not a conspiracy? This can be classified as suggestive evidence, if you get to see many such suggestive and also implicative evidence, then you can finally get near to the conclusion that India is involved in anti-Pakistan activities. Till then, these are unreliable. Look at the obvious as I said, India does not wants to destabilize Pakistan or take away any of its land by force even including Pakistan occupied Kashmir.
As far as your argument about "who is U.N to decide India's territorial disputes" I would say "A little knowledge is a Dangerous Thing" you don't even know that it was Nehru who went running to U.N for his territorial disputes and when the verdict was not in your favor, it was very conveniently ignored, hypocrisy at its best.
That remains, UN is no one to decide territorial dispute. I can respond to your comment, but this will take the thread in entirely another direction.
RAW has been involved in terrorist activities in Pakistan and "Sarabjit Singh" is someone who should be an embarrassment to you but since you are not willing to admit that your establishment has been involved in any terrorist activities in Pakistan and all they do is ring bells in Mandirs then I suppose we are only being ignorant.
That is what you would think because that is what you would see and read, but I urge you again, do try to see the obvious. India is not interested in an unstable Pakistan and India has no territorial ambition.
Brother this argument will not take us anywhere and neither will talks of War as suggested by Gates who comes from a country whose reputation is tainted itself and they only look towards aggression as a solution to everything.
Well Gates said what he had to say for many possible reasons. But India will surely know what to do when a such a situation arise, the US has nothing to important to suggest or imply, except what they will do when such a situation arise.
Despite all the disagreement we have atleast i'm happy that we were able to have an argument in a mature and civilized manner.
Yes, and I must say that you are a good representative of your country and I know that it is hard to concede to my arguments, but I hope you would try to be more considerate in understanding your so called opponent. Rest assured that Indians have no grudge against the people of Pakistan, all we ask is a proper way forward.
Last edited: