how come it is shared by whole India
You tell me.
Watch recorded telecast of discussions in news channels over Mumbai attack or any such major attacks in India. Read columns and opinions by people in newspaper, discussions on international forums, etc.
Btw i'm still waiting for your verdict based on your cross-verification skills over the names mentioned in the post above.
I have not had a chance to look into their case. Kashmir Singh is alleged to be a spy and not a terrorist. But if they are guilty according to your law, then do punish them, but do give them fast and justified trial.
See brother try to understand something, you are trying to justify something by saying it is shared by whole of India does not make sense. There is alot shared by the whole of Pakistan as well but doesn't mean that's the reality.
You have twisted my statement to give an expression that my opinion is totally based on what others have to say about the issue and I have no brain of my own.
You catch a terrorist whose nationality is Pakistani and other then that you still haven't been able to prove any involvement from the official quarters, whereas Kashmir Singh right after crossing the border into India admitted everything.
Kashmir Singh, is alleged to be a spy, not a terrorist. There are spies from every nation. You cannot equate these two people by any means. Now establishing a direct evidence of Pakistani establishment is not something that is possible by Indian efforts but may become possible if scope for such evidence is left by the schemers themselves. But as I indicated before, evidence need not always be hard-core, for example, you cannot prove to a blind, in a direct manner, that there exists something called a moon. There are evidences called implicative evidences that leads to such conclusions.
At the end of the day it is the responsibility of the Gov to ensure the protection of its people where your country clearly failed on 26/11 and ours fail almost everyday.
I would not disagree with this argument. In fact, India will have to make all effort to prevent any future major terrorist attack here, otherwise it would be very hard to hold any retaliatory actions, and that would certainly be not good for either sides.
Threatening to attack a country just because you were attacked by its citizen doesn't make sense, KSA should have been attacked right after 9/11 only if the Americans were following your ideology.
Let me clarify you, India has always talked about surgical strikes in Pakistan on the terrorist camps identified, in case it has to retaliate, certainly, it would never be declaration of war from India unless Pakistan decides to resist such strikes through its own force.
War is not even an option here, it will be catastrophic for both the countries, whereas there are other ways of solving things.
Do consider the question I put forth in my first post here to understand our POV over this point. But if there are other ways to solve this, do suggest them. BTW all possible solutions have been tried and tested.