What's new

India's Nuclear Agreement

. . .
India to showcase thorium technology at IAEA meet-India-The Times of India


India to showcase thorium technology at IAEA meet
25 Sep 2008, 0425 hrs IST,TNN

MUMBAI: India may be waiting for the US Congress to clear the Indo-US civilian nuclear deal so that the country can begin importing uranium from the NSG countries, but that doesn’t mean that the government has given up on thorium as a source of nuclear energy.

India will showcase its indigenous thorium technology at the 52nd general conference of the IAEA, beginning at Vienna on Monday.

At the annual session, which will be attended by the world’s top nuclear experts, the Indian team, headed by Atomic Energy Commission chairman Anil Kakodkar, will speak about the advantages of thorium.

The message is clear: despite international cooperation through the nuclear deal, India has no intention of giving up its indigenous route since it has the world’s largest deposits of thorium. At the IAEA meet, the Indian team will emphasise on long-term energy independence.

As part of the programme, the Department of Atomic Energy has organised a week-long exhibition called ‘Extending the global reach of nuclear energy through thorium’ at the conference.
 
.
India open for $80 billion in nuclear business - BusinessWeek

India open for $80 billion in nuclear business

By ERIKA KINETZ

MUMBAI, INDIA

Indian officials tend to go a little wiggly at the phrase "U.S.-India civilian nuclear cooperation agreement."

It sounds so . . . foreboding. Why not, they reason, call it India's clean energy deal with the rest of the world? Or a great trade deal?

"Why do you give it this ballistic name?" said Commerce Minister Kamal Nath. "It's an energy agreement."

Even as the U.S. Congress considers overturning three decades of policy by allowing the transfer of atomic fuel and technology to India in return for international inspections of its civilian--but not military-- nuclear reactors, officials here point out that the global gates of nuclear trade with India are now open.

Whether or not the U.S. decides to allow its companies to bid for business, they say, India will get its uranium.

"If a deal with Congress doesn't happen, we will have business with other countries. So simple," said SK Malhotra, a spokesman for India's Department of Atomic Energy.

India finalized bilateral nuclear trade agreements with Russia and France in January, but the government has held out on implementing them until a U.S. deal goes forward, said Shreyans Kumar Jain, chairman of India's state-run Nuclear Power Corp. Ltd., which runs all 17 of the nation's nuclear reactors.

After his U.S. trip, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh heads to France, where he has been widely expected to ink the deal with France.

On Sept. 6, the 45-member Nuclear Suppliers Group made a historic exception for India, overturning a 34-year-old nuclear trade ban despite the fact that India has refused to sign nonproliferation agreements.

Opponents fear India will use its new access to build nuclear weapons. Proponents point to the nation's enormous energy needs and say the NSG waiver has saved the world from a 1.6 billion ton cloud of coal fire which would otherwise have roared up from India in 2050.

Today, India gets just 3 percent of its energy--about 4100 megawatts-- from nuclear power. By 2032 the government plans to quadruple total generating capacity, to 700 gigawatts, with nuclear accounting for 63,000 megawatts.

That adds up to about 40 new nuclear reactors, worth some US$80 billion, according to Jain.

The limiting factor on India's nuclear expansion has been access to uranium. Despite an aggressive hunt in basins, thrusts, and folds across the country, known domestic deposits will support only 10,000 megawatts of nuclear capacity.

"All reactors are going to be sourced from foreign vendors and tied to fuel supply agreements," Jain said.

Jain says Nuclear Power Corp. hopes to finalize contracts with General Electric Co., Westinghouse Electric Co., France's Areva group, and Russia's Rosatom State Nuclear Energy Corp. to build a first round of eight reactors starting in 2009.

The government, he added, plans to take a 30 percent equity stake in the new reactors, and raise the rest in debt. He said he's not worried about the global credit freeze, as large domestic players, like the Life Insurance Corporation of India, Power Finance Corp. Ltd., and domestic banks can fund the initial build-out. "Beyond that, we have to go for external commercial borrowing," he said.

Rosatom is already helping India build two nuclear reactors, under an agreement that predates Russia's NSG membership.

Areva has also been pro-active in pursuing business, with CEO Anne Lauvergeon joining French President Nicolas Sarkozy on his January state visit, according to three government officials.


Ron Somers, president of U.S.-India Business Council, has been leading lobbying efforts for a coalition that includes companies from Wal-mart Stores Inc, FedEx Express, AT&T, General Electric Co. and New York Life Insurance Company to Westinghouse Electric Co., Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin Corp., and Chevron.

Efforts, he said, have kicked into high gear since the Sept. 6 NSG waiver.

If the deal doesn't go through Congress, he said, "we'll be the only one shut out."

"It's like sitting on our hands watching a football game, not being able to play," he added.


GE helped build India's first nuclear reactor in the 1960s, and today GE would love to rekindle that relationship.

"It's a US$30 billion-plus market in India. There's a huge opportunity for a company like GE," said Kishore Jayaraman, regional head of GE operations in India, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh. "We have been pushing for it."

But he added that a deal is still far off.

"We have not had any detailed discussions," he said, adding that while GE has been in close talks with the Indian government, the company cannot, by law, enter into advanced discussions absent a green light from Congress.

Moreover, India must change its domestic laws to set liability limits for private companies operating in the nuclear sector before private players like GE can build any reactors.

"We are hopeful we'll get something," Jayaraman said. "But it's just a hope at this stage."

A lot of Indian companies are also hopeful.

Currently, private companies cannot operate nuclear reactors, but the separation of India's civilian and military nuclear programs could pave the way for deeper private sector involvement on the civilian side, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, a top official in India's Planning Commission, said in a recent interview.

Jain, of the Nuclear Power Corp., said a raft of companies, including the Tata Group, Reliance Power Ltd., GMR Infrastructure Ltd., GVK Industries Ltd., the Essar Group, and the state-run National Thermal Power Corp. have expressed interest in running nuclear power plants in the future.

Parts suppliers and builders, like Hindustan Construction Co., Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Larsen &Toubro Ltd., Gammon India Ltd. and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. could also benefit from India's nuclear build-out.

Deepak Morada, a spokesman for Larsen & Toubro, India's largest builder, said he thinks the capital and manufacturing requirements needed to help 400 million Indians who now live by candlelight switch on the lights, are simply too massive for the government to handle alone.

"We are ready to participate," he said.
 
.
The Hindu : National : More Koodankulam units only if Russia amends law

More Koodankulam units only if Russia amends law

R. Ramachandran
A 1992 domestic law prevents exports to non-nuclear weapon States
Russia is already building two units at Koodankulam

Inter-governmental pact may be signed during Medvedev’s visit in December

New Delhi: One of the agreements signed between India and Russia during the visit of the former Russian President, Vladmir Putin, in January 2007 was a Memorandum of Intent (MoI) to add four more nuclear power units at Koodankulam, where Russia is already constructing two units.

The MoI also expressed the Russian interest to build an unspecified number of plants at other sites as well. However, a formal signing of an Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) to implement these intentions is yet to be done, which is expected to happen during President Dmitry Medvedev’s visit in December this year.

But the IGA can be realised only if Russia amends a domestic law that restricts nuclear exports to Non-Nuclear Weapon States (NNWSs). This amendment is likely to be brought about before President Medvedev undertakes his visit to India, according to reliable sources.

The former President, Boris Yeltsin, issued Decree No. 312 on March 27, 1992 — which was later made law on December 21, 1992 — which states: “Export from Russian Federation of nuclear materials, as also technologies, equipment, installations and special non-nuclear materials, meant for their processing, use or production, at any state, which does not have a nuclear weapon, may be realised only under the condition of setting up of all nuclear activity of this state with the guarantee (safeguards) of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).”

The above implies that export of nuclear Trigger List items — equipment and materials directly related to nuclear fuel cycle — requires the recipient state to have implemented Full-Scope Safeguards (FSS) in its nuclear activities. Interestingly, the Russian regulation actually precedes the Warsaw amendments to the Guidelines of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) that brought in the requirement of FSS for transfer of the Trigger List goods, which were adopted only in April 1992.

Though Russia, being in the process of building two units at Koodankulam, can be the first to get off the block in the wake of the recent amendment to the NSG Guidelines that waives the requirement of FSS specifically for India, the above law of 1992 must be amended and brought in line with the amended NSG Guidelines before it can revive nuclear commerce with India.

Exceptional transfers
The Russian law, as originally adopted in 1992, was actually stricter than the Warsaw Guidelines. It did not have the provisions for exemption from FSS under two exceptional circumstances that the NSG Guidelines had. These related to (1) transfers pertaining to pre-April 1992 agreements and contracts — the provision of “grandfather clause;” and, (2) transfers required for safety of nuclear plants. Such exceptional transfers could be done with islanded or facility-specific safeguards alone as against FSS.

In the original form of the law, Russia could, therefore, not have implemented the 1988 agreement for the two Koodankulam reactors, which the NSG Guidelines actually allowed. The necessary amendment came in the form of a Government Regulation No. 574 on May 8, 1996, after Russia sent a note verbale to the IAEA stating its adherence to the NSG Guidelines. Strangely enough, the amendment still did not incorporate the second of the exceptional circumstances, namely transfers for safety reasons.

This amendment to the law came only on May 7, 2000 through an Edict No. 822 issued by President Putin. It is only after this amendment, Russia could export uranium fuel for the Tarapur reactors in 2001 (and more recently in 2006) under the safety exception provision. It could not have done so in 1995 when the nuclear fuel supplied by France (under the 30-year Indo-American agreement of 1963) had run out. France could not continue supplies because of the requirement of FSS under the NSG Guidelines. India had to turn to China, then not an NSG member, which made a one-time supply in 1995.

Thus, as observers point out, Russia must get its legal framework in order and amend its 1992 law suitably if it has to take advantage of its better positioning in the Indian context and be the first to begin nuclear exports. Though details of French domestic laws are not readily available, it stands to reason that France too must have nuclear export laws that are in conformity with the NSG Guidelines. If so, France will also have to amend its laws to incorporate NSG’s India-specific waiver. It is not clear if this has already been done.
 
.
U.S.-India nuclear deal gets boost in Congress

U.S.-India nuclear deal gets boost in Congress | Top News | Reuters


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The odds of the U.S.-India civil nuclear cooperation agreement being approved by the U.S. Congress improved on Thursday when a key lawmaker embraced a bill to end the three-decade ban on nuclear trade with India.

House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Howard Berman introduced a bill to approve the deal identical to Senate legislation, dropping his own competing version and eliminating any need to reconcile the two.

The California Democrat introduced the bill after getting a telephone call late in the day from U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, said House Foreign Affairs Committee spokesman Lynne Weil.

She declined to elaborate on his decision, but said he expected "to address the matter in greater detail tomorrow."

Congressional blessing is the last hurdle to the pact, which the Bush administration believes will forge a strategic partnership with the world's largest democracy, help India meet rising energy demand and open up a market worth billions.

Critics argue the deal undermines efforts to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and sets a precedent allowing other nations to seek to buy such technology without submitting to the full range of global nonproliferation safeguards.

The agreement has drawn criticism from nonproliferation advocates because India has shunned the Nonproliferation Treaty meant to stop the spread and production of nuclear weapons as well as a companion international pact banning nuclear tests.

Asked about Berman's decision to abandon his competing version of the bill, Sharon Squassoni, a Carnegie Endowment for International Peace nonproliferation expert said, "I think it improves the chances that Congress will approve the bill.

While Berman's decision may improve the probability of the legislation passing this year, it must still be voted on by both houses of Congress, which is striving to reach agreement on a $700 billion bailout to save the U.S. financial system.

Members of Congress are also rushing to complete all other business in the next few days so that they can go home to campaign ahead of the Nov. 4 election.

The congressional maneuvering over the agreement occurred as U.S. President George W. Bush met Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh at the White House.

Bush, who wants to get the deal approved before he steps down on Jan. 20, told Singh he hoped Congress would approve the civil nuclear agreement in a form satisfactory to India.

"It's taken a lot of work on both our parts, a lot of courage on your part," Bush said seated next to the Indian leader in the Oval office. "We're working hard to get it passed as quickly as possible," he said.

Singh echoed those sentiments, saying "I know these are difficult issues," but that he hoped the Congress would approve the deal in a manner acceptable to both countries.

Bush and Singh were to have dinner together.

U.S.-India nuclear deal gets boost in Congress | Top News | Reuters
.
 

Attachments

  • PM Singh and President  Bush embrace each other.jpg
    PM Singh and President Bush embrace each other.jpg
    10.2 KB · Views: 8
Last edited:
.
Manmohan to Bush: people of India love you

The Hindu : Front Page : Manmohan to Bush: people of India love you


When history is written, it will be recorded that Bush played a historic role in bringing our democracies closer: PM

“The credit for ending India’s nuclear apartheid goes to you”

“In opinion polls, ratings for Bush higher in India than any other country”
:cheers:

STRATEGIC EMBRACE: Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who met U.S. President George Bush at the White House in Washington on Friday, told Mr. Bush that “the people of India deeply love you.” And Mr. Bush told Dr. Singh that he appreciated his friendship and leadership.


WASHINGTON: “People of India deeply love you,” Prime Minister Manmohan Singh told United States President George W. Bush here on Thursday evening.

Sitting within a handshake distance from the American President at the Oval Office, Dr. Singh uttered those words, which produced a smile of satisfaction on Mr. Bush’s face but left the Indian media puzzled.

Normally not given to loquaciousness, Dr. Singh found himself in an expressive mood and easily showered liberal praise on his host.

“In the last four and half years that I have been Prime Minister, I have been the recipient of your generosity, your affection, your friendship. It means a lot to me and to the people of India.” As Mr. Bush sat beaming in the glare of television cameras, he heard the visitor saying, “When the history is written, I think it will be recorded that President George W. Bush played a historic role in bringing our two democracies closer to each other.”

A grateful Prime Minister acknowledged Mr. Bush’s part in ending India’s nuclear winter: “For 34 years, India has suffered from a nuclear apartheid. We have not been able to trade in nuclear material, nuclear reactions, and nuclear raw materials. And when this restrictive regime ends, I think a great deal of credit will go to President Bush. And, for this I am very grateful to you, Mr. President.”

Dr. Singh was clearly mindful of the fact that Mr. Bush’s stay at the White House was coming to a close. Turning to Mr. Bush, Dr. Singh summoned up all the characteristic sincerity he could, and said: “So, Mr. President, this may be my last visit to you during your presidency, and let me say ‘Thank you very much’. The people of India deeply love you.”

Later, when the Foreign Secretary was asked what was the factual basis to the Prime Minister’s statement of Indian affection, an unfazed Shiv Shankar Menon said: “I think, if you look at the public opinion polls, the ratings for President Bush are higher in India than in any other country. That is the factual basis.”

The agreeable evening continued over a “working dinner” Mr. Bush hosted to Dr. Singh. Mr. Bush had invited his senior colleagues — Vice-President Dick Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Ambassador David Mulford, National Security Adviser Hadley — for what was described as “a small and very relaxed” affair.

Much was made of the fact that Mr. Bush spent nearly three hours with the Indian visitors on a day when his mind and attention were focussed on the American fiscal crisis. In fact, the interaction was delayed by about 20 minutes as Mr. Bush was holed up talking economy with the two presidential candidates, John McCain and Barack Obama.

As the Indian officials saw it, “the quality of conversation” was very satisfactory. “It was very easy flow of ideas,” a fact that attested to the meeting of minds in the last few years. “I have not seen a conversation of this quality at this level. It is very rare that you see this,” gushed Mr. Menon.

The Hindu : Front Page : Manmohan to Bush: people of India love you
 
.
Debate on N-deal in US House over, vote tomorrow
Barkha Dutt, Sarah Jacob
Friday, September 26, 2008, (Washington)
NDTV.com: Debate on N-deal in US House over, vote tomorrow

The US House of Representatives has debated Indo-US nuclear deal but the vote has been postponed until Saturday.

The debate lasted 40 minutes in the 435-member US Congress. The support for nuclear deal House was bipartisan. Howard Berman backed 123 agreement in the House.

The bill amending America's Atomic Energy Act to allow American companies to sell nuclear fuel and technologies to India was introduced on the floor after over 24 hours of hectic negotiations between lawmakers and the Bush administration. (Watch)

There were at least three versions of the bill until both the Senate and the House agreed on an identical bill. The bill was tabled

The bill is still to pass a vote in the US Senate, but that could now happen only next week. In order to avoid hurdles in the process, there is a possibility the nuclear deal will be tagged on to other legislation that goes to a vote in the Senate.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh met US President George Bush at the White House on Thursday. During the meeting, Bush said America is working hard to get the Indo-US civilian nuclear deal passed as quickly as possible. He added that Washington wants the deal to satisfy New Delhi.

Singh responded saying that India hopes that the deal will be approved in a manner that satisfies both India and the US. He also underlined that the people of India deeply love President Bush.

"When 34-year-old restriction ends and history is written, Bush would find place in it. My historic meeting with Bush in 2005 transformed India's relations with US," said Manmohan Singh.

Bush also complimented Singh for his "courage and leadership".

Reacting to the ongoing deliberations on the Indo-US nuke deal, former US Ambassador to India Robert Blackwill said on Thursday, "We are within sight of an agreement tomorrow. The House will vote on it in the morning."

Meanwhile, Indians are not expecting the deal to happen by late Friday.

Earlier, Howard Berman, who had opposed the agreement in the present form, moved a bill in the US House that made a controversial reference to Iran. After huge diplomatic pressure that reference was removed.

However, there are other provisions in the bill over which India is unhappy. One major worry is a clause that says the 123 Agreement will be subject to the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act, the Hyde Act and any other applicable US law.

Meanwhile, the Senate also did not vote on Thursday. The two bills are different. Which means that a committee will have to meet and prepare a final bill.

Earlier on Thursday US Ambassador to India David Mulford said it was impossible to predict if the deal would go on the same day, but it could happen in the next few days.
 
.
Rice to visit India next month to wrap up N-deal


With the nuclear deal poised for an approval by the US Congress, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will visit India next month to sign the 123 bilateral agreement that will seal the landmark deal.
"We are discussing the possibility of the visit of the Secretary of State to India. We have been trying it for sometime and looking for possibility of dates," Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon told reporters on Thursday night after talks between US President George Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

"Rice will come to India early next month. If the Congress approves the 123 pact, it will be signed during Rice's visit," an official, privy to nuclear negotiations, told IANS.

The India-US 123 pact, the bilateral accord that set terms for nuclear business between the two countries, will be signed by External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee and Rice.

Rice could not make it to an exclusive dinner Bush hosted for Manmohan Singh and his close aides on Thursday at Old Family Dining Room in the White House as she was working overtime to swing Democrats to expedite Congressional approval for the nuclear civilian agreement.

The US House of Representatives is poised to take up an approval resolution on Friday that could lead to the Congressional approval, which will effectively finalise the deal.

The Congress is scheduled to break Sep 26 for the Nov 4 elections, but indications are that the two chambers may work through the weekend and maybe even into Monday to deal with the Bush administration's $700 billion bail-out plan to save the US financial system from its worst crisis in decades.

The Bush administration is also working overtime to ensure that the India nuclear accord is wrapped up by the time Manmohan Singh concludes his five-day visit to the US Saturday.

In his talks with Mammohan Singh at the White House, Bush assured the Indian prime minister that his administration was "working hard to get the deal passed as quickly as possible".

He also underlined that Washington wanted the deal to satisfy New Delhi - a veiled reference to some contentious provisions in the bill which are being opposed by India.

The bill introduced on Thursday by House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman Howard Berman, like the Senate Committee version, makes the implementing 123 Agreement subject to the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act, the Hyde Act and any other applicable US law.

But contrary to the general impression, there is no reference to "testing" except by implication in either bill. India has maintained that it is only bound by the 123 agreement and does not comment on internal political process in another country.

As the Senate version is slightly different, the upper chamber too didn't vote on the measure on Thursday, apparently waiting for the final House version to emerge.

If the two passed versions are not identical, a select committee would have to meet in a "conference" to reconcile them before Bush can sign in it into law.



Rice to visit India next month to wrap up N-deal- Hindustan Times
 
.
Rice to visit India next month to wrap up N-deal


With the nuclear deal poised for an approval by the US Congress, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will visit India next month to sign the 123 bilateral agreement that will seal the landmark deal.
"We are discussing the possibility of the visit of the Secretary of State to India. We have been trying it for sometime and looking for possibility of dates," Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon told reporters on Thursday night after talks between US President George Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

"Rice will come to India early next month. If the Congress approves the 123 pact, it will be signed during Rice's visit," an official, privy to nuclear negotiations, told IANS.

The India-US 123 pact, the bilateral accord that set terms for nuclear business between the two countries, will be signed by External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee and Rice.

Rice could not make it to an exclusive dinner Bush hosted for Manmohan Singh and his close aides on Thursday at Old Family Dining Room in the White House as she was working overtime to swing Democrats to expedite Congressional approval for the nuclear civilian agreement.

The US House of Representatives is poised to take up an approval resolution on Friday that could lead to the Congressional approval, which will effectively finalise the deal.

The Congress is scheduled to break Sep 26 for the Nov 4 elections, but indications are that the two chambers may work through the weekend and maybe even into Monday to deal with the Bush administration's $700 billion bail-out plan to save the US financial system from its worst crisis in decades.

The Bush administration is also working overtime to ensure that the India nuclear accord is wrapped up by the time Manmohan Singh concludes his five-day visit to the US Saturday.

In his talks with Mammohan Singh at the White House, Bush assured the Indian prime minister that his administration was "working hard to get the deal passed as quickly as possible".

He also underlined that Washington wanted the deal to satisfy New Delhi - a veiled reference to some contentious provisions in the bill which are being opposed by India.

The bill introduced on Thursday by House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman Howard Berman, like the Senate Committee version, makes the implementing 123 Agreement subject to the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act, the Hyde Act and any other applicable US law.

But contrary to the general impression, there is no reference to "testing" except by implication in either bill. India has maintained that it is only bound by the 123 agreement and does not comment on internal political process in another country.

As the Senate version is slightly different, the upper chamber too didn't vote on the measure on Thursday, apparently waiting for the final House version to emerge.

If the two passed versions are not identical, a select committee would have to meet in a "conference" to reconcile them before Bush can sign in it into law.



Rice to visit India next month to wrap up N-deal- Hindustan Times
 
.

By Demetri Sevastopulo in Washington
Published: September 27 2008 03:00

Congressional approval for a US-India nuclear deal was yesterday embroiled in the protracted negotiations on Capitol Hill about the $700bn financial bail-out legislation.

President George W. Bush met Manmohan Singh, the Indian prime minister, in the White House on Thursday evening as his officials worked hard to persuade Congress to pass legislation required to seal the deal.

The White House believes the deal, which would end a decades-old ban on providing civilian nuclear power to India, would cement a new strategic relationship with India. Critics say the agreement lacks adequate safeguards and rewards a nuclear-weapons state that has refused to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.

Despite lobbying by Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, it was unclear yesterday whether Congress could pass legislation before it recesses because of the bail-out negotiations.

The Senate foreign relations committee backed the accord this week but it requires approval by the full Senate, where members have voiced strong reservations.

Howard Berman, chairman of the House foreign affairs committee, agreed to introduce the Senate bill - instead of a similar measure he had proposed - in a decision that erased need for both chambers to agree. But he put it on a fast-track course needing a two-thirds rather than simple majority.

"I agreed to this request because Secretary of State Rice made a personal commitment to me that - in a change of policy - the US will make its highest priority at the November meeting of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) the achievement of a decision to prohibit the export of enrichment and reprocessing equipment and technology to states that are not signatories of the nuclear nonproliferation treaty."

Critics of the nuclear agreement claim Congress members capitulated to the demands of the administration partly because they want to satisfy pro-India constituents in advance of November's elections. They say the measure does not conform with the Hyde Act, passed by Congress to authorise the administration to negotiate the deal.

Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association, says the legislation does not comply with provisions that, for example, require the US to stop providing India with nuclear technology if India were to conduct another test.

"This nuclear deal as written poses unacceptable risks to US national security and does great damage to the international nuclear nonproliferation regime," said Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat.
 
.
US House approves Indo-US nuke deal

WASHINGTON: The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to approve the Indo-US nuclear deal that would allow the US to provide nuclear materials to India.

While there was bi-partisan support for the Bill, a considerable number of Democrats voted against the Bill moved by party colleague Howard Berman, an opponent of the measure who was persuaded to change his line.

While 120 Democrats voted for the Bill, 107 Democrats voted against. Of the Republicans, 178 voted for and 10 voted against.

The deal still faces major obstacles in the Senate. :frown:

The accord reverses three decades of US policy by shipping atomic fuel to India in return for international inspections of India's civilian reactors.

The accord enjoys strong support from senior lawmakers in both parties.


Supporters warn that while Congress argues over the deal, American businesses are losing opportunities as France, Russia and other countries eyed India's multibillion-dollar nuclear market.

Critics say the initiative sends the wrong message to countries like Iran as they pursue atomic programmes. India built its bombs outside the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which provides civil nuclear trade in exchange for a pledge from nations not to pursue nuclear weapons.

India has refused to sign nonproliferation agreements and has faced a nuclear trade ban since its first atomic test in 1974.

The 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group of countries that supply nuclear material and technology agreed this month to lift the ban on civilian nuclear trade with India after contentious talks and some concessions to countries fearful it could set a dangerous precedent.

US House approves Indo-US nuke deal-India-The Times of India

:cheers:
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom