'India's missile tech a decade behind that of China': expert

[Kinetic]

Agni-V is laughable compared to what china fields, its comparable to something china field in the 60's and 70's with slightly better accuracy. anyone with a half a brain knows agni-V will not give india the lead over china in anything.

Before posting what you have seen in your dream, can you please give us some link about Chinese missile's accuracy?

Yes it is laughable to compare Agni-V with Chinese missiles. Let me know about one Chinese missile that has better capabilities and technologies than Agni-V[/B]. Don't run away...

 

[Rank]

A country .. A chief of so called Super duper Asian power India .... claimed.... 805 of tanks not working in night time (rest of 20 not working in day time lol)..

Sometime Army chief said we will figth both countries at a time lol

otherside sometime army chief said blaa blaa ...

sometime Indian military said pakistan nuclear tech ahead over us... and sometime Indian military or govt said our technology ahead over China lol its mean Pakistan missile technology ahead over both lol!

man this country always make me laugh nuthing else!! lol

A country who need support from UN, Russia, US and UK to pressurize Pakistan and even after support by those countries still this country cant do anything in front of pakistan comparsing herself with China lol!!

man this country make me made lol em laughing like hell!

I request to all members on PDF

Dont discuss anything with these Indians because you may have lost the Forum battle... but not the Real war!!! lol

 

[Kinetic]

A country .. A chief of so called Super duper Asian power India .... claimed.... 805 of tanks not working in night time (rest of 20 not working in day time lol)..

Sometime Army chief said we will figth both countries at a time lol

otherside sometime army chief said blaa blaa ...

sometime Indian military said pakistan nuclear tech ahead over us... and sometime Indian military or govt said our technology ahead over China lol its mean Pakistan missile technology ahead over both lol!

man this country always make me laugh nuthing else!! lol

A country who need support from UN, Russia, US and UK to pressurize Pakistan and even after support by those countries still this country cant do anything in front of pakistan comparsing herself with China lol!!

man this country make me made lol em laughing like hell!

I request to all members on PDF

Dont discuss anything with these Indians because you may have lost the Forum battle... but not the Real war!!! lol

Unrelated Biased TROLL!

Dont discuss anything with these Indians because you may have lost the Forum battle... but not the Real war!!! lol

Forgot history?

 

[Rank]

Unrelated Biased TROLL!

Exactly this same Biased Trolll by your Military Chief LOL!!

 

[Dash]

There is no point in flaming on what the media highlights. Indian media and indian army chief belong to a soverign country and they have the right of speach. I would request all members to stay calm and belive in our scientists and our capabilities.

It doesnt matter what others say, we know what we are and others too.

 

[gpit]

When Mr. Nehru was shouting 'Hndi-Chini bhai bhai', Chinese were planning to attack India.

Let me correct you, buddy. It should be:
"When Mr. Nehru was shouting 'Hndi-Chini bhai bhai', and forwarding into China at the same time, Chinese were planning to attack India."

I present the following reading materials for you to study:

"India initiated a Forward Policy in which it placed outposts along the border, including several north of the McMahon Line, the eastern portion of a Line of Actual Control proclaimed by Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1959." Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"2008 British renunciation of the Simla Accord

On Oct. 29, 2008, David Miliband, the British foreign secretary, announced that the previous British actions including the Simla Accord (1913) and thus the McMahon Line had been an anachronism and a colonial legacy. He apologized to China for not having renounced those actions earlier. He was supported by Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong, who called the British position embodied in the Simla Accord (1913) a "quaint eccentricity".[22][23]" Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unless a second-hand imperialism is to materialize itself, McMahon Line is now of no existence.

 

[RAHUL INDIAN]

Let me correct you, buddy. It should be:
"When Mr. Nehru was shouting 'Hndi-Chini bhai bhai', and forwarding into China at the same time, Chinese were planning to attack India."

I present the following reading materials for you to study:

"India initiated a Forward Policy in which it placed outposts along the border, including several north of the McMahon Line, the eastern portion of a Line of Actual Control proclaimed by Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1959." Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"2008 British renunciation of the Simla Accord

On Oct. 29, 2008, David Miliband, the British foreign secretary, announced that the previous British actions including the Simla Accord (1913) and thus the McMahon Line had been an anachronism and a colonial legacy. He apologized to China for not having renounced those actions earlier. He was supported by Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong, who called the British position embodied in the Simla Accord (1913) a "quaint eccentricity".[22][23]" Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unless a second-hand imperialism is to materialize itself, McMahon Line is now of no existence.

China boundary is aalready way too extended...Tibet is anothe country...so end this imperialism first.... mcmohan line is b/w India and Tibet and not b/w China and India..

 

[gpit]

China boundary is aalready way too extended...Tibet is anothe country...so end this imperialism first.... mcmohan line is b/w India and Tibet and not b/w China and India..

Right. India is too big compared with its neighbors. India should be split into 30-300 smaller countries to extinct once for ever its imperialistic mentality.

Even your master of british colonists have renounced the McMahon Line, a neo-imperialism still wants to keep it by various excuses.

Keep your farce go on, and the people of the world are watching...

 

[Kinetic]

Right. India is too big compared with its neighbors. India should be split into 30-300 smaller countries to extinct once for ever its imperialistic mentality.

India does not exist for the sake of her neighbors. India existed for last 6000 years with earliest civilization and will remain.

Even your master of british colonists have renounced the McMahon Line, a neo-imperialism still wants to keep it by various excuses.

Keep your farce go on, and the people of the world are watching...

Its Chinese those lives in middle age imperialist era that invaded Tibet and claims every part of the world that once under some empire. If India were imperialist like China than the land from Herat to Arakan should be one nation.

 

[Kinetic]

Let me correct you, buddy. It should be:
"When Mr. Nehru was shouting 'Hndi-Chini bhai bhai', and forwarding into China at the same time, Chinese were planning to attack India."

I present the following reading materials for you to study:

"India initiated a Forward Policy in which it placed outposts along the border, including several north of the McMahon Line, the eastern portion of a Line of Actual Control proclaimed by Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai in 1959." Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"2008 British renunciation of the Simla Accord

On Oct. 29, 2008, David Miliband, the British foreign secretary, announced that the previous British actions including the Simla Accord (1913) and thus the McMahon Line had been an anachronism and a colonial legacy. He apologized to China for not having renounced those actions earlier. He was supported by Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong, who called the British position embodied in the Simla Accord (1913) a "quaint eccentricity".[22][23]" Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unless a second-hand imperialism is to materialize itself, McMahon Line is now of no existence.

What McMohan line? What about Tibet? China was already aggressor for many Asian countries. They have fought wars with almost every neighbors in last sixty years.

 

[gpit]

India does not exist for the sake of her neighbors. India existed for last 6000 years with earliest civilization and will remain.

Indian civilization will exist in those 300 smaller countries as was before.

Its Chinese those lives in middle age imperialist era that invaded Tibet and claims every part of the world that once under some empire. If India were imperialist like China than the land from Herat to Arakan should be one nation.

Studies in West have shown that only China was controlled under minority ethnics, would China expand the territory. So when minority seize the power in China, maybe you guys have to worry about. Now it's mainly Han in power.

India hasn't been able to be a imperialist due to fierce resistances from its neighbors, as reflected by 1962 sino-india conflict and other conflicts; also due to inability of Bharat itself, as reflected by its own internal killing and discrimination, and external diplomatic confusions.

 

[ROSH]

Indian civilization will exist in those 300 smaller countries as was before.



Studies in West have shown that only China was controlled under minority ethnics, would China expand the territory. So when minority seize the power in China, maybe you guys have to worry about. Now it's mainly Han in power.

India hasn't been able to be a imperialist due to fierce resistances from its neighbors, as reflected by 1962 sino-india conflict and other conflicts; also due to inability of Bharat itself, as reflected by its own internal killing and discrimination, and external diplomatic confusions.

Dude - you brag a lot about Chinese'past. Do you know that the larger part of your history, China was exteremely poor....barren inhospitable land..and just poor peasants..

China was not colonialized becoz it was not worth the effort....resource wise..even the people were not as hard workimg like Africans ( not even good slave material).

Opium was the only excpetion, which interested Europeans. But I think, Japanese did ruled you for whatever merit they thought it to be fit.....

 

[gpit]

Dude - you brag a lot about Chinas'past. Do you know that the larger part of your history, China was exteremely poor. You were not colonialized becoz you were just too poor, resource wise. Opium being soemething that inetersted others..

LOL! If China were extra poor, how could you sell opium to China?

By the way, enlighten me on the part where Japanese mercilessly ruled you.

You are indeed badly in need of a teaching on this subject. japan occupied 1/4 of China, Where was no rule unlike British on you. Please read the attached:

Japanese Instrument of Surrender

We, acting by command of and on behalf of the Emperor of Japan, the Japanese Government and the Japanese Imperial General Headquarters, hereby accept the provisions in the declaration issued by the heads of the Governments of the United States, China, and Great Britain 26 July 1945 at Potsdam, and subsequently to by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, which four powers are hereafter referred to as the Allied Powers.

...


Douglas MacArthur
Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers

C.W. Nimitz
United States Representative

Hsu Yung-Ch'ang
Republic of China Representative

Bruce Fraser
United Kingdom Representative

Kuzma Derevyanko
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Representative

Thomas Blamey
Commonwealth of Australia Representative

L. Moore Cosgrave
Dominion of Canada Representative

Jacques Leclerc
Provisional Government of the French Republic Representative

C.E.L. Helfrich
Kingdom of the Netherlands Representative

Leonard M. Isitt
Dominion of New Zealand Representative


Japanese Instrument of Surrender - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Can you show me a British Instrument of Surrender to India?? I know your feeble capability simply disallows you.

Obviously you are taking sick pleasure in Japanese invasion of China, and perhaps dreaming one day India would do the same atrocity against China, as some Internet Indians posted.

Let me assure you that if India dares to follow Japanese fallen track, I bet you there will be a version of Indian Instrument of Surrender to China and its allied powers.

 

[Kinetic]

Indian civilization will exist in those 300 smaller countries as was before.

LOL

Kid, seems like you do not have basic knowledge about Indian history! First study about 'History of India' than come.

Studies in West have shown that only China was controlled under minority ethnics, would China expand the territory. So when minority seize the power in China, maybe you guys have to worry about. Now it's mainly Han in power.

Han was a mixed tribe created by Mongolian 'attacks' that almost destroyed 'China'.

India hasn't been able to be a imperialist due to fierce resistances from its neighbors, as reflected by 1962 sino-india conflict and other conflicts; also due to inability of Bharat itself, as reflected by its own internal killing and discrimination, and external diplomatic confusions.

Again Bharat? Do you post in Rupee News? or a regular read?

After backstabbed by the Chinese in 1962 India became prepared and won all wars with gaining many lands. Read first.... Just after 1962 India defeated Chinese in a border skirmish badly.... I am talking about famous Chola incident of 1967.....

 

[gpit]

..


Han was a mixed tribe created by Mongolian 'attacks' that almost destroyed 'China'.

Foolish statement. What is the total population of Mongol? What is the total population of Han?

Would it hurt you by reading more history and being less ignorant?

Again Bharat? Do you post in Rupee News? or a regular read?

After backstabbed by the Chinese in 1962 India became prepared and won all wars with gaining many lands. Read first.... Just after 1962 India defeated Chinese in a border skirmish badly.... I am talking about famous Chola incident of 1967.....

LOL! To me it was only a childish skirmish. In addition, if Indian edited WIKI is to believe, "Chinese casualties are 1 killed 9 wounded, Indian casualties are 4 killed in action. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chola_incident" And you foolishly call it "famous"