That's a thing about "profit" in government owned entities....the numbers are never true. Such a high profitability isn't possible unless you do some funny accounting which given that it's the Indian govt., can't be ruled out.
I see you still didn't get what I was alluding to.......one highly profitable company in a sea of profit eating ones versus a sea of low profitable companies, which would you choose?
Any profit Ankrish makes are put towards operating unprofitable companies and ventures...
Again, Amazon, like SpaceX is a private company. Either way, most of Amazon's profits come from its AWS business ventures.
Similarly....I would like to see where the "24%" profits are coming from.....in the end.....they're all investments from the Indian government....any profit gets gobbled up and in the bigger picture.....you get a net loss under the circumstances which are present in India.
See what I wrote above.
SUPARCO......not suparo
SUPARCO, like NASA, doesn't need to generate a profit.....since it's a govt. owned entity. For a $36M budget...yes, you read that write.....for what it has already achieved is mind boggling since no other govt. has done so much with so little.
And the $36M budget is what it has been allocated......the actual given amount is much lower...