What's new

India’s growth already starting to sag

Thing is we need to really focus on improving the state of our education and skilling. Modi and his team is doing a lot better than previous administrations in realising this and making it a major program....but I will need to wait till his current term is completed to put a judgement call on the effect (when the data comes back from say primary, secondary schooling quality + vocational training centre output). This will then have to work in concert with the demand pull that will start to really be generated from this year onwards looking at the raw data of this quarter so far on the back of monsoon push and better utilisation of capacities that have been generated in earlier part of his term.


It's still in it's infancy .Industrial growth , infrastructure , real Estate & the financial markets are still sluggish . These metrics need be measured in terms of decades .Which would require another term of the NDA. Agriculture seems to be erratic .One would like to see more investments & incentives here given that apart from the services sector , this is the only sector which can contribute to the nation's growth what with the sheer numbers that it employs & that the manufacturing sector along with the infrastructure will take time to develop. It's only the growth in the services sector which is carrying the nation today apart from the good news in the agricultural sector this year.

We've a long way to go.
 
.
But to which of my post you responded with your troll was completely unrelated. I was putting info about a little stats and a tax bill to be passed in Parliament.


Who gave you this image my friend or posting 2010s data will sail your boats in 2016? Half of them were even flawed.:D
Just updating few figures:
Adult Literacy Rate:
your stats:
China: 94%
India: 63%

Updated:
China: 99.7%
http://stats.uis.unesco.org/unesco/...?ReportId=121&IF_Language=eng&BR_Country=1560
India: 90.2%
http://www.uis.unesco.org/DataCentre/Pages/country-profile.aspx?code=IND&regioncode=40535
:D


Internet Penetration:
As per your figure:
China: 32%
India: 9%

As per updated:
China: 52.2%
http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users/china/
India: 34.8%
http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users/india/
Though, it grew from 12% to 32% in just last 4 years. Currently, must be standing around 38-39% or somewhere near 500 millions in numbers in India.

In 2014, India's HDI in 2014 was 0.586 against China's 0.719. In 2015, India stood at 0.609 meanwhile China at 0.727. India has higher GDP per capita growth than China also now.

Even for accuracy of rest of your statistics, I hope you know how to use internet and websites of WB, IMF and UNSECO.
Simply, a lot have been caught up, a lot more will done soon.

His statistics on child mortality rate and life expectancy at birth is flawed too.. he should updated his stats.
 
.
The current administration has many windows dressing schemes, but lack a grand strategy that addresses more fundamental issue that India is facing. I have not seen Modi gov pours money into education

Yes you haven't seen anything because you do not do in-depth research on the subject....you want everything to be presented to you on a platter in mainstream media or something....in just 2 years of time?

You seem to not understand throwing more public money at the education sector comes LATER (if at all depending on exact need as far as private delivery uptake increases in years to come). Right now its fixing the bureaucracy to better transfer what is there existing (this is happening already, I have posted the links and sources several times and am not going to bother anymore to be frank)....This budget by GDP % (public) and per capita spending (public + private) is much higher than the other 2 large south asian populated countries (which rarely attract any similar criticism from the main Chinese posters on this forum, including you). Pouring more public money into a system that needed and still needs a lot of structural fixing will just be a terrible waste of resources....with tremendous opportunity costs (given Indian revenue deficit).

I mean you are seriously going to call the major education reform a window dressing scheme compared to CPEC? One is actually reworking mechanisms to address delivery as we speak, the other is throwing excess liquidity hoping to generate a surface veneer on a very rotten structure underneath (that no reform has addressed and will address in forseeable future).

His statistics on child mortality rate and life expectancy at birth is flawed too.. he should updated his stats.

He won't. The agenda is clear for CPC trolls. Shoot and scoot.
 
.
Yes you haven't seen anything because you do not do in-depth research on the subject....you want everything to be presented to you on a platter in mainstream media or something....in just 2 years of time?

You seem to not understand throwing more public money at the education sector comes LATER (if at all depending on exact need as far as private delivery uptake increases in years to come). Right now its fixing the bureaucracy to better transfer what is there existing (this is happening already, I have posted the links and sources several times and am not going to bother anymore to be frank)....This budget by GDP % (public) and per capita spending (public + private) is much higher than the other 2 large south asian populated countries (which rarely attract any similar criticism from the main Chinese posters on this forum, including you). Pouring more public money into a system that needed and still needs a lot of structural fixing will just be a terrible waste of resources....with tremendous opportunity costs (given Indian revenue deficit).

I mean you are seriously going to call the major education reform a window dressing scheme compared to CPEC? One is actually reworking mechanisms to address delivery as we speak, the other is throwing excess liquidity hoping to generate a surface veneer on a very rotten structure underneath (that no reform has addressed and will address in forseeable future).



He won't. The agenda is clear for CPC trolls. Shoot and scoot.

If I were you , I wouldn't engage these Wumaos .You do it only when you are in a frivolous mood & willing to troll.

Here's a definition of a Wumao to those who came in late -


A Wumao (5 jiao - not 5 hairs) is a person who is 'employed' by the central gov't to troll forums (English and Chinese) looking for topics that put China and the Chinese people in a bad light (i.e 'hurts the feelings of China'). Their "job" is to join the discussion and post pro-Chinese/China/CCP messages and discredit whomever is 'hurting the feelings of China'.



The moniker 'wumao' is used because such people are rumored to get paid .5 RMB per post.



One can usually spot a wumao based on their tendency to 'argue' like a child...ex. A foreigner posts that Chinese girls are immature and vapid. The wumao will join the discussion to say that foreigners only want sex from Chinese girls and are selfish.



Wumaos often make an attempt to come across as a foreigner but certain phrases give them away...mispelling 'true' as 'ture', the use of 'and so on' instead of 'etc.', the use of 'nowadays, as we all know, lovely, famous, delicious...' and other stock expressions that drive any teacher of academic writing insane.



I should add that on this forum, some people get branded as a wumao for their relentless support of all things Chinese (usually their posts contain the inane expression, "China, love it or leave it {gtfo}"). Some others are posting nothing but negative comments. The 'thumbs up/down' feature tends to reflect which side is being personally offended rather than allowing discourse and freedom of expression - something that should never be suppressed.

Happy everyday!!!!
 
.
You have mastered writing phrases in English. Next learn to write sentences. Then may be just may be talk about IQ on an English speaking forum.

Lastly, IQ is overrated - marginal growth in prosperity has very low correlation with IQ. If IQ were a hard predictor of prosperity, Japan would haven been kicking China's posteriors in 90s when your average IQ was 85.
Nice, we have a "Miss English teacher" right here. Let you tell you something, Miss. I am an overseas Chinese, I speak English pretty well. I do know you're a woman judging by your name. Am I doing alright so far? Good, that's gotten out of the way.
Since you spoke of the Chinese IQ of the 90s. Would you be kind enough to post the link here to back your statement?

Ps: Try using punctuation sometimes, your post would make more sense. I had a hard time trying to decipher your hinglish. ;)
 
. . . . . . .
The current administration has many windows dressing schemes, but lack a grand strategy that addresses more fundamental issue that India is facing. I have not seen Modi gov pours money into education, and you are still buying expensive foreign weapons like no tomorrow.

Saddening to see how little you know about the reforms the current Indian government is implementing
 
.
.
Yes you haven't seen anything because you do not do in-depth research on the subject....you want everything to be presented to you on a platter in mainstream media or something....in just 2 years of time?

You seem to not understand throwing more public money at the education sector comes LATER (if at all depending on exact need as far as private delivery uptake increases in years to come). Right now its fixing the bureaucracy to better transfer what is there existing (this is happening already, I have posted the links and sources several times and am not going to bother anymore to be frank)....This budget by GDP % (public) and per capita spending (public + private) is much higher than the other 2 large south asian populated countries (which rarely attract any similar criticism from the main Chinese posters on this forum, including you). Pouring more public money into a system that needed and still needs a lot of structural fixing will just be a terrible waste of resources....with tremendous opportunity costs (given Indian revenue deficit).

I mean you are seriously going to call the major education reform a window dressing scheme compared to CPEC? One is actually reworking mechanisms to address delivery as we speak, the other is throwing excess liquidity hoping to generate a surface veneer on a very rotten structure underneath (that no reform has addressed and will address in forseeable future).



He won't. The agenda is clear for CPC trolls. Shoot and scoot.


Take it easy, my friend. Most of us have a day job and don't have the expertise nor the time to do "in-depth-research" for specific issues, so we reply on mainstream media for information. If you think mainstream media as a platter, you are surely entitled to your personal opinion.

Sure, Modi has been in office for "just two years", but didn't he have a master plan to address the most pressing issues facing the nation when he was running for the office? In the US, a term of presidency is 4 years, and most Americans would be very pissed if nothing has happened half way through and the excuse was it is "just 2 years".

NO, I don't understand how "throwing public money at the education" as a bad thing. For Chinese, it is government's responsibility to provide best possible public education system to all citizens, and the private schools are for those who can afford extra expense. That's why the budget for education in China has been steadily increased since the market reform started in 80's, and it is now accounted for 4% of Chinese GDP, 3 times as much as China's military budget. It is THE best investment a country can do for its own future, so why it should be on back-burner? It is a Much wiser investment than tens of billions dollars spent on expensive foreign weapons, which create no job and yield no return for the future of a country.

As for the other countries in south Asian, I have nothing to say, because they do not have the ambitious as a superpower that India always wants to be.
 
.
What does it mean? I think it's a racist slur for Pakistanis by Chinese?? Not too sure.
Anyways .I will report him. i hate these racists on here.

It is for all brown subcontinent people.

It stems from them saying "acha" a lot (to mean ok, very well, got it etc)

It is used in similar fashion to the many expletives used by others for chinese people that I don't think needs any introduction. "grey boy" has probably been called them to his face more than he can remember i bet.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom